• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Russian Revolution 1917

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

GCSE Coursework: The Russian Revolution 1917 Joseph Fitzpatrick History - Mr. Vere a) Explain Rasputin's Contribution to the collapse of Tsarism It has been argued by many historians that Grigori Rasputin played a vital role in the fall from power of the Tsar and his family, and therefore also played an important role in the complete collapse of Tsarism in Russia, and the later rise of communism. He had a lot of involvement with the Russian royal family, and it is often disputed whether or not he wanted the Russian government to fall, and also whether or not the role he played in the fall was all-important. Although there is significant evidence which portrays Rasputin as an "evil" figure, causing destruction in his wake, most of the evidence suggests that in this situation he was actually quite innocent, guilty of nothing other than mildly extravagant debauchery. Rasputin came from a very religious, somewhat superstitious Siberian background. He was brought up in a way that assured he would believe in the divinity of the family of the Tsar. Furthermore, due to his dedicated belief in his religion, it is extremely unlikely that he would have done anything in order to purposefully damage the political structure of his native country. It can be argued that his illegitimate sexual behaviour proves his deceptiveness. However, most evidence shows us that Rasputin had a strange belief that through sin, one can become closer to God. If this is true, then it is improbable that he would have made any kind of endeavours to seize any power in Russia. ...read more.

Middle

This was yet another foolish decision, as it was clear the people wanted peace. The decision to carry on fighting only meant more mutinies, more famine, and more casualties. Therefore, less popularity for the government. Many peasants didn't believe in any serious communism, however, almost all peasants wanted to own their own land; at least enough that they could get a decent living from. However, the government made the decision to leave the land in the hands of the current property owners, thus turning the support of the working class against themselves. The soviets and the provisional government agreed to co-operate in order to help the country to become stable again, and in the hopes that one day the country could prosper again. However, a lot of soviet members strongly disliked co-operation with the provisional government, and yearned for communism. This proved a bad decision on the part of the provisional government, as the soviets already had a lot of legitimate political power when Lenin uttered his famous words "all power to the soviets". However, it is also arguable that the provisional government were not strong enough to have destroyed the soviets, even in the early stages. The provisional government also agreed with the soviets on the topics of freedom of speech and the press: a move the government hoped would increase national levels of trust, as well as allowing the people the right to form unions or strike if they wished, and for elections to be fair and a constitution to be drawn up. However, these decisions just increased the power and the popularity of the soviets, which would later be the downfall of the provisional government. ...read more.

Conclusion

come out lucky, the Bolshevik party would have been left in the shade, waiting for their opportunity to seize power - an opportunity which might not have come around again. They just happened to be fortunate enough that all of these parties were extremely weak and incapable of achieving such ends. The Cadets already had all the power they wanted, and were happy with it, so weren't in any particular hurry to make any major changes - much to the distaste of the general public. The Social Revolutionaries were too 1-dimensional. The only major policy that they had was for land reform, and the public wanted more. Also, the party was too diverse geographically. And finally, the Mensheviks didn't believe that Russia was ready for such changes yet, and therefore had no action to go through with. However, this factor, like the others, rely on the other 3 factors in a web of causation. It is arguable that the reason these parties were so weak was because none of them had a strong, risk-taking, intelligent leader like Lenin. Also, it is very possible that they failed due an overwhelming amount of bad luck. Finally, it is probable that the main weakness of each of these 3 parties was the fact that they were not as good at propaganda, and certainly did not have more popular policies, than the Bolshevik party. At the end of the day, it is very unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have managed to have taken power if any of these 4 factors were taken away, and was extremely unlikely that they would have done it so quickly, and retained power for so long. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and Lenin

    overthrow the Tsar failed and he was arrested and ordered to exile for three years, when the second revolution started his punishment was finished so he entered Russia with the help of Germany and he manage to take siege of the palace he killed all of the Tars family(?)

  2. Why did the Provisional Government fall from Power in November 1917?

    This made the Bolshevik realize the importance of planning and started to seize important places and made them secured which was also another reason to contribute towards the fall of Provisional Government as they had known nothing.

  1. The Russian Revolutions – 1917.

    They lost total faith in the Tsar. The Tsarina Alexandra and Rasputin affected the Tsars government mostly in 1915, when the Tsar became commander in chief of the army. Alexandra was left alone to rule the country, and because Rasputin was a healer had helped Alexis with his haemophilia she turned to him for help and advice.

  2. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    The Tsarina's authority was greatly resented by the Russian people as she was German and was thought to be overly influenced by the peasant 'holy man' Grigory Rasputin. Rasputin had managed to obtain access to the court through his professed ability to cure the heir to the throne, Tsarevich Alexis of his haemophilia.

  1. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    If he didn't agree with any of the ideas of the Dumas he was able to dissolve it. The first Duma only lasted from 1st May to July 1906, the second one lasted form March to June 1907 and was dissolved because the Duma demanded rights and didn't like Stolypins ideas but Tsar did.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    They were often cold or hungry. Because of the cold weather piles of snow and ice stopped the railways carrying fuel and supplies into the city, Women factory went on strike. Their menfolk followed them. On the 23rd of February the women held a demonstration, this was called International Women's Day.

  1. How significant a figure in the revolution of 1917 Russia was Lenin?

    councils formed by elected workers and peasants which were attractive to the people as a good option for new ways to find new leaders; The discontent of the peasant farmers in the countryside and how they were being treated by the regime and The DUMA setting up an alternative and more attractive government to many.

  2. The 1917 Russian Revolution Summarised

    However Michael would not accept leadership unless he was elected by the Duma. He resigned the following day, leaving Russia without a head of state. After the abdication of the Romanovs a Provisional Government was quickly formed by leading members of the Duma and recognised internationally as Russia's legal government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work