• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Russian Revolution 1917

Extracts from this document...


GCSE Coursework: The Russian Revolution 1917 Joseph Fitzpatrick History - Mr. Vere a) Explain Rasputin's Contribution to the collapse of Tsarism It has been argued by many historians that Grigori Rasputin played a vital role in the fall from power of the Tsar and his family, and therefore also played an important role in the complete collapse of Tsarism in Russia, and the later rise of communism. He had a lot of involvement with the Russian royal family, and it is often disputed whether or not he wanted the Russian government to fall, and also whether or not the role he played in the fall was all-important. Although there is significant evidence which portrays Rasputin as an "evil" figure, causing destruction in his wake, most of the evidence suggests that in this situation he was actually quite innocent, guilty of nothing other than mildly extravagant debauchery. Rasputin came from a very religious, somewhat superstitious Siberian background. He was brought up in a way that assured he would believe in the divinity of the family of the Tsar. Furthermore, due to his dedicated belief in his religion, it is extremely unlikely that he would have done anything in order to purposefully damage the political structure of his native country. It can be argued that his illegitimate sexual behaviour proves his deceptiveness. However, most evidence shows us that Rasputin had a strange belief that through sin, one can become closer to God. If this is true, then it is improbable that he would have made any kind of endeavours to seize any power in Russia. ...read more.


This was yet another foolish decision, as it was clear the people wanted peace. The decision to carry on fighting only meant more mutinies, more famine, and more casualties. Therefore, less popularity for the government. Many peasants didn't believe in any serious communism, however, almost all peasants wanted to own their own land; at least enough that they could get a decent living from. However, the government made the decision to leave the land in the hands of the current property owners, thus turning the support of the working class against themselves. The soviets and the provisional government agreed to co-operate in order to help the country to become stable again, and in the hopes that one day the country could prosper again. However, a lot of soviet members strongly disliked co-operation with the provisional government, and yearned for communism. This proved a bad decision on the part of the provisional government, as the soviets already had a lot of legitimate political power when Lenin uttered his famous words "all power to the soviets". However, it is also arguable that the provisional government were not strong enough to have destroyed the soviets, even in the early stages. The provisional government also agreed with the soviets on the topics of freedom of speech and the press: a move the government hoped would increase national levels of trust, as well as allowing the people the right to form unions or strike if they wished, and for elections to be fair and a constitution to be drawn up. However, these decisions just increased the power and the popularity of the soviets, which would later be the downfall of the provisional government. ...read more.


come out lucky, the Bolshevik party would have been left in the shade, waiting for their opportunity to seize power - an opportunity which might not have come around again. They just happened to be fortunate enough that all of these parties were extremely weak and incapable of achieving such ends. The Cadets already had all the power they wanted, and were happy with it, so weren't in any particular hurry to make any major changes - much to the distaste of the general public. The Social Revolutionaries were too 1-dimensional. The only major policy that they had was for land reform, and the public wanted more. Also, the party was too diverse geographically. And finally, the Mensheviks didn't believe that Russia was ready for such changes yet, and therefore had no action to go through with. However, this factor, like the others, rely on the other 3 factors in a web of causation. It is arguable that the reason these parties were so weak was because none of them had a strong, risk-taking, intelligent leader like Lenin. Also, it is very possible that they failed due an overwhelming amount of bad luck. Finally, it is probable that the main weakness of each of these 3 parties was the fact that they were not as good at propaganda, and certainly did not have more popular policies, than the Bolshevik party. At the end of the day, it is very unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have managed to have taken power if any of these 4 factors were taken away, and was extremely unlikely that they would have done it so quickly, and retained power for so long. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How convincing is the argument that WW1 was the main factor in the collapse ...

    The Populists later developed a terrorist wing, and in 1881 members from the Populist faction 'The People's Will' assassinated Alexander II. Far from increasing the support for the party in this single act the Populists found they had alienated themselves from other opposition groups, and in the following years Populism abruptly decreased.

  2. How Significant Was Leon Trotsky's Role In the October/November Russian Revolution In 1917

    the Russian society at primitive levels for a countless number of years.4 All of these factors combined amounted to an explosive situation in Petrograd, the Russian capitol. During these years riots, terrorism, repression and oppression were the words that defined the time period in the eyes of the working classes.

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    At 9.40pm they took over the Winter Palace. The Bolsheviks had seized control of Russia. The importance of Lenin in these events was not crucial, although his significance was seen in the events leading up to the coup and immediately afterwards.

  2. Why was Lenin able to seize power in October 1917?

    Nicholas had total lost control of his country. So in a final attempt to keep Tsarist going on in Russia, He asked his brother, Michael to help. But Michael refused and Nicholas abdicated. Without Nicholas being weak and not wanting to run the country.

  1. Madness in Russian Literature

    His subconscious reveals the split between the physical and the mental and his double begins to be all that Golyadkin wants to be; he is decisive, well-liked and successful. The source of Golyadkin's madness is not as clear as in The Doubleor The Bronze Horseman, however, it is a result

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    The statistics in source A show that in comparison to other leading countries, Russia's production of various resources was very poor. Russia had the least quantity of coal and pig iron production in the table. In these two areas, Russia has significantly less than any other of the great powers.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    because Stalin didn't base his decisions on evidence but on suspicion as source J illustrate. Many of the most gifted and able citizens had disappeared. The army and navy were seriously weakened by the loss of most senior officers. Industrial and technical progress was hampered by the loss of top scientists and engineers.

  2. "To what extent was World War One the main reason for the downfall of ...

    Families were being torn apart by the war which made even patriotic Russians find it hard to support the government and the war cause. With the army loosing support for the regime the situation became very dangerous for Tsar Nicholas, as the government became open to attacks without a force

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work