• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Russian revolution - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework A) Sources A and B are similar in many ways such as both accounts mention that the shooting was supposed to have happened. They don't say a shooting happened but they say it had happened supposedly. There may not be a definite killing according to both sources. Both sources were also written in 1918, which is another similarity the sources have. Both sources also imply that not everyone was killed in the house. Both suggest that they all weren't killed, but some members were killed. Both sources also claim that someone was shot. This suggests that this piece of evidence could be quite reliable as two different sources from two different people agree with each other. But both sources may not be reliable as the evidence they collected may be incorrect or unreliable. Both sources cannot be reliable enough because although both sources give some similar evidence and details, neither of them was at the scene of the crime to be totally sure of what happened to the Tsar and his family. Although the writers of the sources may be trustworthy and reliable they may have faulty evidence that they got from people who told them. Also the writers of sources may use their own opinions and beliefs. ...read more.


Also the judge in source c carried on the investigation after a and b were dismissed. c) I don't agree with that because the guy in the eyewitness account was said to have probably been tortured by the whites, so he may say things to protect himself from being tortured again. In source D and E somebody is obviously lying. The guy says he had left the room, whereas his wife in source E says he fired a gun, but he had said he had only heard the shots from outside. Could he be protecting himself from the whites? Also his wife says they were all killed whereas he didn't say that at all. I don't think what he is saying is very reliable evidence because he may be saying things the whites want him to say. I don't think his wife would have any reason to lie. There are no other sources that agree with source D that may make you think that he could be lying more. D) I think source f is most useful for a historian because it was a photograph and it was actually taken so it should be reliable. A photograph should help a historian because it is evidence that it is reliable enough to investigate and put further work on, whereas the other two was only ...read more.


Source J gives more detail as it mentions about the lorry being stuck ,no other sources mention this.This is a big effect on the death of the remaining members. Source J also mentions there being 5 bodies identified as being from the tsar, his wife and 3 daughters. This information tells us that a son and a daughter were missing. No sources said about them being the 2 people missing. Others sources such as in source I it says 'His wife and son had been sent off to a secure place'. This source does not make sense to source J because the two people don't fit in with the 2 missing bodies. They both get it the same qbout the son but the wife is claimed to be a missing member althought source J says it was one of the daughters. All the sources say different things about what had happened and how the bodies were destroyed. None I don't think agree with source J, but I think this source may be a lot more reliable and a lot different because a lot more evidence had been discovered by then and it has evidence to back it up with the discovered bodies and they ahd been identified. Michelle White ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The definition of "landlord" was highly arbitrary, as many actually controlled very small amounts of land. Millions were executed in this bloody movement. State control and development of industry were based on the Soviet model, which favored heavy industry. In the 1950s, the Soviet Union provided specialists, planning, and loans

  2. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    This is significant because Bukharin and Stalin got on well and were very close so why was he expelled by Stalin? This shows Stalin's absurdity. Stalin believed Bukharin, along with millions of others, were against him. We can tell from the source that Bukharin thought of him a monster, or

  1. Source based questions on the Russian revolutions.

    a mistake under pressure, possibly because they wanted to publish this as soon as possible that they forgot to mention other important details, in this case the whereabouts and welfare of the daughters. I think also, that when they said, "His wife and son have been sent off to a secure place", they were trying to make themselves seem caring.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    Source D is a photograph taken from the Russian Information Agency in 1933. The photograph shows Stalin among other delegates at a meeting regarding collectivisation. Source D may have been used in propaganda as people hated the idea of collectivisation and therefore this would persuade them to think again.

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    Source F is the more realistic view of Stalin. The reason why it is the most realistic is because Bukharin wrote it in the safety of Paris. This means that Bukharin could of told the whole truth without fear or retribution of attack by Stalin. The truth actually is that Stalin was a murderer but he was also an

  2. Was there a revolution in Germany in 1918?

    Ans. The Second Reich in Germany led by Kaiser Wilhelm II was becoming highly unpopular and people from all corners of Germany wanted a change in the government and their motive was fulfilled finally by a revolution that was primarily led by Ebert, an SPD leader and thus came a new democratic government with the name of Weimar Republic.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Romanov family may have taken place or what could have happened to the surviving members of the Tsar family which the British Sir Charles Eliot concluded. However, it doesn't informs us of what exactly happened to the Romanovs as it mentions details such as, "showed my the house where

  2. Russian Revolution Sources Questions

    living and working conditions and fuel and food shortages brought about by the war. The conditions of workers were poor before the shortages, the fuel and food shortages made the conditions for living and working even worse. People were dying by this time and could not carry on in this way any longer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work