• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Somme - source related study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Joseph Collins 24th January 2004 Coursework 2 2d) Source F is from a recent book called 'British Butchers and Bunglers of world war'. It is written by an Australian writing who is extremely critical. In it he calls Haig "as stubborn and as unthinking as a donkey" and called the Somme "criminal negligence" but we must remember that the writer is looking for the bad points of Haig and the battle and probably exaggerating them so they can go in the book. This means the source isn't entirely reliable, as with all non-eyewitness accounts, but is also biased because in the book they are only trying to find the bad side of the people in the war. But the idea of if Haig "could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then he would at some time win the war," is not mentioned as such in the sources by Haig, but there is definitely links to it especially in sources A and B. ...read more.

Middle

At the time of the war everyone must have thought they were doing the best they could including Haig so although it is easy to criticise it is not always fair. In source F the writer calls the battle of the Somme "criminal negligence" and says he "knew he had no chance of a breakthrough but still sent men to their deaths" which suggests that the writer believes that the battle didn't help at all and Haig just wanted to send men to their deaths. Source G contradicts this by saying that "it gave the western powers confidence. Their armies had accomplished an achievement that gave good promise for the future. The confidence of the German troops in victory as no longer as great as it was before." This shows that the Somme did help greatly because, as has been proved, the loss of German morale helped to break the stalemate and helped The British and French win the war. It also says "A great part of the best, most experienced and most reliable officers and men were no longer in their places", and talks about "the heavy losses". ...read more.

Conclusion

Haig was one of the main architects of the allied victory." This shows that the general obviously did not think that Haig had sent his men off to their deaths. It says that "Germany's spirit of resistance was broken" which agrees with source G. The source also states that Haig "never wavered from his purpose of breaking down the powers of powers of resistance of the enemy, both morally and physically" and the men "were inspired by his determination." This suggests that Haig was not as "unthinking as a donkey" and that his 'strategy' was not 'slaughter'. Both sources G and H are more reliable then source F and also seem to prove it wrong. Source F was written how somebody had seen the battle of the Somme and because of the huge casualties many people would agree that it did look like 'slaughter' and there was no point to the battle of the Somme, but both these sources show that even though it was awful and the casualties were huge it did help the allied troops greatly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    This is yet another justification, in some people's opinion as to Haig's incompetence. After the appalling losses, and very limited successes of the first few battles of the offensive, many people questioned why Haig continued with his plan that was surely doomed to failure.

  2. Windsor Coursework

    Tourist are most content with windsor as we can see, only 2 people would not visit and 18 out of 20 people would definatly or is planning to visit windsor again. Surely the majority of tourist are impressed with windsor which must mean windsor is a good tourist centre.

  1. Haig and the Somme - source related study

    and source E comment reliably on the weather conditions. In source D (ii) the author comments on the atrocious weather conditions, for example 'despite being hampered by the most unfavorable weather'. To corroborate source D (ii), source C shows soldiers wading through knee-high mud. Source E also gives a description of the horrific weather conditions; for instance it states 'bad weather conditions'.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    eyes and ears and that would be one less man to fight. The noise will have come from all the firepower, like artillery, machine guns and shells. Soldiers would get very ill, by sheer lack, of sleep and would be so tired, they would collapse.

  1. Suffragettes - source related study.

    Women had played a vital role in the war and the Prime Minister, Herbert Asquith who was originally against votes for women, was now for it. In source H he said in the House of Commons in nineteen seventeen 'for three years now, the suffragettes have not restarted that horrible campaign of violence.

  2. Votes for women - source related questions.

    Both sources also. Both sources think that there are different ways to campaign or to change the situation, they both, however give varying ways to do so. Source B supports source C by saying that by taking the more womanly, indirect option can get you farther than being violent, using direct protest.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    The artist also at this point is showing the generals to be very dim. Not only do they contradict themselves, but they also cant remember what they were going to say. The general in the cartoon has to be given the second reason why a practise is nothing like the real thing and doesn't even remember to mention the third.

  2. The 1913 Derby - source related study.

    a popular event, I can see a whole different viewpoint and a wider area maybe it would be easier to tell which angle she came from, from this photo. But it is much harder to know what has happened as there is nothing to give me motives dates or times.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work