• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Somme - source related study.

Extracts from this document...


Joseph Collins 24th January 2004 Coursework 2 2d) Source F is from a recent book called 'British Butchers and Bunglers of world war'. It is written by an Australian writing who is extremely critical. In it he calls Haig "as stubborn and as unthinking as a donkey" and called the Somme "criminal negligence" but we must remember that the writer is looking for the bad points of Haig and the battle and probably exaggerating them so they can go in the book. This means the source isn't entirely reliable, as with all non-eyewitness accounts, but is also biased because in the book they are only trying to find the bad side of the people in the war. But the idea of if Haig "could kill more Germans than the Germans could kill his men, then he would at some time win the war," is not mentioned as such in the sources by Haig, but there is definitely links to it especially in sources A and B. ...read more.


At the time of the war everyone must have thought they were doing the best they could including Haig so although it is easy to criticise it is not always fair. In source F the writer calls the battle of the Somme "criminal negligence" and says he "knew he had no chance of a breakthrough but still sent men to their deaths" which suggests that the writer believes that the battle didn't help at all and Haig just wanted to send men to their deaths. Source G contradicts this by saying that "it gave the western powers confidence. Their armies had accomplished an achievement that gave good promise for the future. The confidence of the German troops in victory as no longer as great as it was before." This shows that the Somme did help greatly because, as has been proved, the loss of German morale helped to break the stalemate and helped The British and French win the war. It also says "A great part of the best, most experienced and most reliable officers and men were no longer in their places", and talks about "the heavy losses". ...read more.


Haig was one of the main architects of the allied victory." This shows that the general obviously did not think that Haig had sent his men off to their deaths. It says that "Germany's spirit of resistance was broken" which agrees with source G. The source also states that Haig "never wavered from his purpose of breaking down the powers of powers of resistance of the enemy, both morally and physically" and the men "were inspired by his determination." This suggests that Haig was not as "unthinking as a donkey" and that his 'strategy' was not 'slaughter'. Both sources G and H are more reliable then source F and also seem to prove it wrong. Source F was written how somebody had seen the battle of the Somme and because of the huge casualties many people would agree that it did look like 'slaughter' and there was no point to the battle of the Somme, but both these sources show that even though it was awful and the casualties were huge it did help the allied troops greatly. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    He also mentions the wrong use shellfire (shrapnel instead of high explosive) 'Any Tommy could have told them that shell fire lifts wire up and drops it down, often in a worse tangle than before'. We know that when he tells us this he is telling the truth and is trust worthy and reliable.

  2. Battle of the Somme - source related questions.

    The bombardment that the British used against the Germans, would obviously do much less damage to these than the British generals expected. However this information wasn't used. General Rawlinson always thought that the bombardment would do the soldier's job for them, however patrols were sent out in to no-man's land

  1. Windsor Coursework

    The council may have plans to widen roads and pavements to lessen the congestion cause by the tourist thus making life easier for both residents and tourists. Conclusion The information that I have gathered (primary and secondary)

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    Also, at the end of the source, it says, "they dared not stop". This may mean that they were being made to fight on till the death or they mentally just couldn't stop. A sergeant in the 1st Somerset regiment had written source 15.J, which suggests some reasons for the

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    It is obvious from this cartoon that the artist is out to attack the Leaders of the British Military. He doesn't however mention the amount of ground that was won; only seven and a half miles, but I'm sure that he would have done if possible.

  2. The 1913 Derby - source related study.

    They both support each other that she had two suffragette flags on her and the date of which the incident happened but H tells me about the colours and the exact measurements, which the other doesn't.

  1. Votes for women - source related questions.

    This cartoon shows us the types of protest that the suffragettes did, very loud and very high profile in comparison to the suffragists who, as we can see in this source did things in a quieter more distinguished way. The publication in which the cartoon was printed may have changed

  2. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    During the first day of the Somme, General Rawlinson had so little faith in the infantry that he ordered them to walk across no-mans-land towards the German trenches. Although this cannot be blamed on Haig, many people believe that it was decisions like this that cost Haig so many thousands of men.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work