• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The stalemate developed on the Western Front because the Schlieffen Plan failed. The success of the Germans hinged upon them swiftly taking control of France and this did not occur.

Extracts from this document...


a) The Germans had been expecting a war for many years and so already had a plan to help them win when war finally broke out. The Schlieffen Plan was thought up by the war minister, Count Alfred von Schlieffen who said that Germany needed to avoid fighting on two fronts. The Russians were expected to take six weeks to mobilise their army and the plan was to take advantage of this by sending the German army to defeat France first, knocking them out of the war which would leave German troops free to be sent East to help the Austrians defeat Russia. Germany would invade France by passing swiftly through the neutral country of Belgium. Although the Germans knew that Britain had sworn to protect Belgium in the Treaty of London, the British were not expected to uphold the Treaty and go to war ...read more.


They even blew up their own bridges and flooded land. Although this did not completely stop the German advance, it did slow it down and bought time for the British and French troops to mobilise and meant that the Germans did not reach Paris in six weeks, as was expected. In addition, the German soldiers were able to advance more quickly than their supplies and therefore were underfed and exhausted. The Schlieffen Plan had depended on the British not defending Belgium but on 4th August, Britain decided to uphold the Treaty of London and protect Belgium. They declared war and sent the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), a small group of Britain's best soldiers to meet the advancing Germans at Mons on 23rd August. They had success early on but soon had to organise an orderly retreat because they were greatly outnumberd The Russians were also much quicker to mobilise than expected, taking only three weeks instead of six, and launched an attack on Germany. ...read more.


This meant that Germany was unable to knock France out of the war and the Schlieffen plan had failed. In order to protect the land that they already owned, the Germans dug trenches and soon the British and French dug their own in order to protect themselves from shell fire and snipers. Both sides followed a "policy of encirclement" and tried to outflank the enemy lines. As the Germans moved rapidly towards the sea, the British and French moved troops to block them. The Allies and the Germans wanted to reach the sea and gain control of vital ports such as Dunkirk and Boulogne. For the next four years, the positions of the two sides hardly changed and there was a stalemate on the Western Front. ?? ?? ?? ?? Abby Taylor - History Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How Important was the Role of the BEF in the Failure of the Schlieffen ...

    It failed. All the causes, all the countries made it possible, and each cause had consequences and affected the others, they were all linked together. Belgium's unexpected resistance gave the BEF time to arrive - something the Schlieffen Plan had not intended.

  2. Describe the conditions that soldiers experienced on the Western Front in the years 1915-1917.

    First aid was sent down through the communication trenches. Soldiers who were seriously injured were sent to the Casualty Clearing Station. Soldiers were safe there because they were quite far away from the fighting. There were also doctors and nurses there to help them get better. Some soldiers were taken to Base Hospitals by train.

  1. Why Did A Stalemate Develop On The Western Front?

    However, entrenching left the diggers exposed above ground and hence could only be carried out when free of observation such as in a rear area or at night. Sapping involved extending the trench by digging away at the end face.

  2. Why stalemate broke down on the Western Front World War One

    I believe that the order of importance is: the German offensive, as it changed the way war was fought - giving opportunity for an advance on either side; this advance is the opposite of stalemate. Then the American entry to war as broke the morale of the German troops gravely

  1. Explain how the Schlieffen Plan was meant to work?

    Heavy shelling of German troops made them retreat to the Hindenburg Line at one stage and tanks allowed for the mobilisation of troops behind enemy lines (in some cases scaring the enemy and making them flee). However, the greatest technological advance was in the navy.

  2. Was there much change in the fighting methods employed by the British Army on ...

    Offensives, British artillery strength was fully made up by August and they began their final offensives with more guns than they had before the Germans attacked. A comparable transformation was obtained in the supply of ammunition. Initially Kitchener restricted the orders of munitions to a small number of firms who had supplied the pre-war BEF.

  1. The Western Front

    The French 6th Army under General Joseph Gallieni moved against the exposed flank of General Alexander von Kluck's 1st German Army, which halted its south drive and turned aside to deal with Gallieni. This opened a 48-km gap between the 1st German Army and the 2nd Army under Field Marshal Karl von Buelow.

  2. Was Field Marshall Douglas Haig more important that the allied blockade of German naval ...

    Pershing hoped to accomplish this with a combination of mass and movement. Against his 9 double strength armies Germany mustered only 5 understrength divisions perhaps 50,000 men. By the end of the battle Pershing had 26,277 dead and 95,786 wounded.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work