• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Tactics of William Wallace and Andy Murray in Scotland's Wars Against England.

Extracts from this document...


20 Mark Essay The Scottish Wars of Independence goes down as a great inspirational story in history. The miniscule small army of Scotland with not even half the population of the enemy, Edward?s English army, who had far more weapons and other means of war at there disposal, still managed to defeat Edward. This was down to the tactics used by the leaders- William Wallace and Andrew Murray, great Scottish patriots of there time who go down in Scottish history as heroes. Firstly, the idea of a Scottish rebellion against Edwards?s harsh rule was spreading fast across the kingdom of Scotland. This was all down to two Scottish heroes, William Wallace and Andrew Murray, who both had their reasons for Scottish independence, as well as being true patriots. Andrew Moray was born late in the second half of the 13th century. The date and place of his birth, and if he had any siblings, are unknown. He was born into the Morays of Petty; a wealthy and politically-influential baronial family whose powerbase was located in the province of Moray in north-eastern Scotland Murray came from the highlands. He felt that Edward was not a good leader and that under his laws and regulations life was very harsh. ...read more.


On 11 September 1297, the forces of Andrew Moray and William Wallace defeated the combined English forces of John de Warenne, 6th Earl of Surrey and Hugh de Cressingham near Stirling, on the River Forth. John de Warenne had won a victory over the aristocracy of Scotland at the Battle of Dunbar and his belief that he was now dealing with a rabble proved that he had greatly underestimated the Scottish forces. The small bridge at Stirling was only broad enough to allow two horsemen to cross at a time. The Scots set themselves out in a commanding position dominating the soft, flat ground to the north of the river. Sir Richard Lundie offered to outflank the enemy by leading a cavalry force over a nearby ford, where sixty horsemen could cross at the same time. Hugh Cressingham was anxious to avoid any unnecessary expense in prolonging the war and he persuaded the Earl to reject this advice and order a direct attack across the bridge. The Scots waited as the English knights and infantry made their slow progress across the bridge. They had held back earlier in the day when many of the English and Welsh archers had crossed, only to be recalled because de Warenne had overslept. ...read more.


The Scots hid at the top of the abbey craig until the English were crossing the bridge (which could only take two horse at a time) and charged from the top of the hill. The English had no chance to organize themselves and were heavily massacred. Another tactic that Scotland used that proved important was schiltrons. Under Wallace?s leadership Scotland used static schiltrons in which there would be layer upon layer of men in a circle which was a good defensive tactic and protected a lot of troops as well. However, this tactic wasn?t quite right at first in the way it was used. For example at the Battle of Falkirk Scotland used still schiltrons but were unable to protect themselves from the front line of the English army. Later on when Robert the Bruce took over as leader of the Scottish army he adapted the idea of Wallace?s static schiltrons and decided that they should move while in battle. This use of the schiltron proved far more successful than the previous use. In conclusion, without the tactics employed by Wallace and Murray, there would have been a very little chance that they would have been able to overcome the English army. What they did saved Scotland and the Scottish people from a very harsh life under King Edward?s harsh and unpredictable rule. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. beacon hill

    Also it has found evidence at an archaeological site, so the evidence is extremely reliable and hasn't been tampered with. Another of its strength is that it is detailed evidence from Roman times, which means it is primary evidence. Source 2 is also very reliable because it cross-references between 2

  2. Culture Wars: Forster's A Passage To India

    Way of Knowledge, which, for the thinking man, involves a search for the real self. Adela and Fielding lack the emotional and mystical insight to life possessed by Hindus and Muslims and depend on devotion, reason, and form to understand human relationships.

  1. Knightly Warfare. The knights primary and considered most well known weapon was the ...

    One may be a late Medieval hand-and-halfer or the Renaissance two-hander (Med. Weapons 1). The construction of the blade was relatively thin, over time long sword blades evolved to become longer and thicker (Med. Weapons 3). The change in the blade was caused by the rapid transition from chain mail armor to plate mail armor (Med.

  2. WW1 - technology and trench warfare.

    There was a huge gap in the allied trenches so the Germans could have easily taken the land, nevertheless they did not know how much damage the chemicals had done.

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    It was simply bad luck that that it was dangerous to cross. This led to Custer's men becoming more vulnerable and weaker- which meant their defeat. But Custer should have been able to see and check if the water was safe to cross, which may have saved him.

  2. Henry FOrd

    The reasons there was such a rise in these products was because of the war and the immigrants, made this happen they were happy to work, when and where the where needed. Overall World war one was an incredible drive for the 1920's.

  1. Like most castles in the South of England, all of the changes at Portchester ...

    (this source claims to be a vision of what was Porchester Fort.) I believe that reason the Romans built the Fort agrees with the hypothesis. I feel this way because The Romans were the first to build the castle and when Porchester was built, the Romans had intentions of using it as protection from the Saxons.

  2. Was Oystermouth Castle typical of the castles built in Wales during the middle Ages?

    However similarly was built on the coastline like Oystermouth Castle. Conway Castle, located in North Wales, had a curtain wall fifteen foot thick, with some additional features, which Oystermouth did not have. As it also had eight massive drum towers and two barbicans.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work