• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The term 'butcher of the Somme' in the context of the Battle of the Somme, a significant battle means that Haig was responsible for, almost casually, sending thousands of British troops to their deaths, at the hands of the Germans, for no reason at all.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The term 'butcher of the Somme' in the context of the Battle of the Somme, a significant battle means that Haig was responsible for, almost casually, sending thousands of British troops to their deaths, at the hands of the Germans, for no reason at all. The battle was meant to make the war mobile again, but it led to a longer stalemate. Douglas Haig (1861-1928) was the British commander on the western front during World War I. He was later promoted to full general. With him in charge the casualties were British and Imperial casualties between July 1 and November 19, 1916 totalled approximately 420,000. On July 1st. (British + Canadian) 08:30-09:30= 30,000 casualties, 12:00= 50,000, end of day= 67,000. ...read more.

Middle

Also his usage of favouritism led to the many unnecessary deaths as he used the inferior method of cavalry, which led to the deaths of troops and resources for transport. In conclusion there were a lot of arguments in favour of the title. The fact that Haig wasted lives of men in such a way agrees with the fact of him being the 'butcher of the Somme' However, there are many arguments against that the title should be given to Haig. Some historians have found that many of his actions were caused due to poor communications and false reports, these led to his death-causing actions. For example, his 'messengers' told him that the bombardment was going well and the barbed wire had been ' well cut', this was not true, due to this, Haig launched ...read more.

Conclusion

Additionally and most importantly, he got hardly any help from the French, it was meant to be a Franco-British attack, and he was under a lot of pressure from t he two governments. In conclusion, many of his moves were caused from poor and false communications as well as pressure from the governments. He also had to make do with inferior weapons. To sum up, on one hand, Haig didn't deserve the title as most of his actions were caused by false reports and low-grade weapons. On the other hand, even though he didn't know about the non-success, he did later on and he still kept using the same failed tactics, overall, I think he did deserve it, the continuous usage of failing attacks and therefore causing more deaths for no reason is inexcusable, he did deserve it. Did Haig really deserve the title 'butcher of the Somme' or has history judged him wrong ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    The two parties knew very little about each other, and on principle only communised with those of the same stature. The soldiers could not understand why they were making little or no progress. The generals had to couple battles with losses, and soldiers as statistics, as without doing so, they could not fulfil their duties.

  2. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    In anticipation that the British soldiers would simply be able to walk across no man's lands and occupy the deserted German trenches, Haig sent the men with heavy trench repair equipment. Unfortunately the German soldiers were still alive and manning their carefully positioned machine guns which the artillery bombardment also failed to destroy.

  1. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    and there is calmness among the lines of soldiers waiting for a small vessel led them to safety. The force seems relaxed and there appears to be no great threat from enemy planes. How far we can believe this photograph is questionable, as all the other sources seem to mention

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    I can't see how the deaths of their friends could possibly create an attacking spirit, the only thing it would create was the impression that there General was a complete maniac. There is no use in raising the morale of troops who are going to die anyway, and surely victories

  1. Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the Butcher of the Somme?

    An interpretation that suggests that Haig could not be the 'butcher of the Somme' because Haig was a well skilled general, this can be seen in Source 8, a historian named John Terraine who wrote his own study of the Somme called 'The Smoke and the Fire' in 1980.

  2. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    Although it was first Lloyd George, the Prime Minister during the latter part of the war, who suggested in War Memoirs, Haig was the butcher of the Somme. By George taking into consideration Haig's Diaries to come to his interpretation, and with the immense casualties suffered by fathers, sons, and

  1. Was Haig the butcher of the Somme?

    would know that their weapons couldn't break it up and that it was impossible for any solider to get through it. He also said that the shells dropped would of made more of a mess in the barbed wire than before.

  2. Free essay

    History why did the british lose so amny lives at the somme

    Here we see whether the losses of British men were inevitable or if they weren't what major problems should have been dealt with to prevent so many men being killed. In Source D3 it tells us that no matter how good the training of the soldiers or no superiority of ammunitions the nation must prepare o see heavy casualty lists.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work