• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Tssar's fall from power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question Three Was any one reason from the list more important than the others in the Tssar's fall from power. (12 marks) Answer Three From the list given, there is no one clear factor that is more important than another is. It is difficult to pinpoint one factor as "the most important". I think this is because they are all linked in one way or another. Romanov misrule was certainly the factor that was rooted deepest into Russian history (from about 1616). Ever since then there has been economic hardship among a huge proportion of the Russian people, because of its social structure. I do not think that I can truly say that Romanov misrule is the most important reason for the fall of the Tsar, and the March 1917 revolution. If it was more important than all the others, why did the revolution not happen earlier? The answer is that it was enough on its own, other factors became apparent and contributed to the bad atmosphere in Russia, and the bad attitude towards the Tsar and his family. ...read more.

Middle

and Rasputin (an immoral, religious peasant), many situations arose. The Tsarina would not work with the Duma, and dismissed many able ministers. Therefore, no proper organisation took place concerning food, fuel and other supplies. The railway system fell into chaos and trainloads of food were left rotting. Many male peasants were conscripted into the Army and therefore there was a shortage of farm workers and less food was being produced. Many factories closed so industrial goods were in short supply. As food shortages increased, prices rose, leading to starvation and strikes among the factory workers. As the news came to the Russian peasants that many soldiers were left unfed and badly equipped, more uproar arose. Many Russians did not even know why they were fighting in World War I. Although the others were not less important factors than World War I, they did not set off the Revolution. World War I was a trigger of the March 1917 Revolution, making all other factors more apparent. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Without social and economic hardship, would there have been a revolution? * If Rasputin had not been involved, would there have been a revolution? * If there were no opposition groups, would there have been a revolution? * If World War I had not occurred, could the peace of Russia have been maintained? In all honesty, there is no way of saying which one is more important. They all contributed in their own way to the violent revolts among the Russian people during the 20th century. In my opinion World War One was the main trigger and the Romanov misrule was the main long-term cause. I am quite sure that if the autocratic system of government had been abolished before the 1900 there would have been a different social structure and economy. It is not for me to say whether it would have turned out better than an autocratic system. For the same reason, the number a strength of opposition groups could have been different and the influence of Rasputin as well. The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) Page 3 of 3 The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Thousands of people would come to see Lenin's body for decades to come. Lenin had become a father type figure of communism and was seen as a slogan of communism by which legitimacy could be conferred on any idea published by the Soviet Government.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    This may indicate that the Tsar believes he is more important than the Bishops are and that he puts himself before his country. This suggests evidence for Idea One; "Autocracy is an outdated form of government not suited to twentieth century Russia."

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Source I, is an American source and is clearly biased as they were against communism. Thus is would be very obvious that they would want to criticise the Soviet Union's methods. The source portrays the courtroom at Stalin's show trails.

  2. Investigate the changes that took place in Horsforth between 1700 and 1900

    This idea is proven as according to my secondary source context by Laurence, "They were the outstanding leaders of Horsforth". This statement is referring to the Stanhope family, which proves their importance since they were the leaders of Horsforth. Their wealth was also outstanding as they lived in Hall Park

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    end to the imperialist slaughter and the conclusion of a democratic peace. In short, the Kerensky regime in the course of nine months gave ample proof of its total inability to meet the most basic needs of the Russian people.

  2. The Fall of the Tsar

    While the sources A and B don't say anything about womanising, we get a slight impression, and besides, even though it wasn't said, it doesn't mean it wasn't there. 3: Source F is a letter from the Tsarina Alexandra to her husband explaining the situation in Petrograd in February.

  1. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    The war degenerated into a series of Russian military blunders that demonstrated the inefficiency of the Russian army and navy. The war ended with humiliation of Russia's defeat in august 1905. Evidence of Russia's military weakness increased the people's discontent and demands for reform.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Source C is not one sided. He tells you briefly about what Sergeyev thought. However everything he says doesn't make sense because Sergeyev says different things in the source. It also tells up totally different things to the other two sources.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work