• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Tssar's fall from power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question Three Was any one reason from the list more important than the others in the Tssar's fall from power. (12 marks) Answer Three From the list given, there is no one clear factor that is more important than another is. It is difficult to pinpoint one factor as "the most important". I think this is because they are all linked in one way or another. Romanov misrule was certainly the factor that was rooted deepest into Russian history (from about 1616). Ever since then there has been economic hardship among a huge proportion of the Russian people, because of its social structure. I do not think that I can truly say that Romanov misrule is the most important reason for the fall of the Tsar, and the March 1917 revolution. If it was more important than all the others, why did the revolution not happen earlier? The answer is that it was enough on its own, other factors became apparent and contributed to the bad atmosphere in Russia, and the bad attitude towards the Tsar and his family. ...read more.

Middle

and Rasputin (an immoral, religious peasant), many situations arose. The Tsarina would not work with the Duma, and dismissed many able ministers. Therefore, no proper organisation took place concerning food, fuel and other supplies. The railway system fell into chaos and trainloads of food were left rotting. Many male peasants were conscripted into the Army and therefore there was a shortage of farm workers and less food was being produced. Many factories closed so industrial goods were in short supply. As food shortages increased, prices rose, leading to starvation and strikes among the factory workers. As the news came to the Russian peasants that many soldiers were left unfed and badly equipped, more uproar arose. Many Russians did not even know why they were fighting in World War I. Although the others were not less important factors than World War I, they did not set off the Revolution. World War I was a trigger of the March 1917 Revolution, making all other factors more apparent. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Without social and economic hardship, would there have been a revolution? * If Rasputin had not been involved, would there have been a revolution? * If there were no opposition groups, would there have been a revolution? * If World War I had not occurred, could the peace of Russia have been maintained? In all honesty, there is no way of saying which one is more important. They all contributed in their own way to the violent revolts among the Russian people during the 20th century. In my opinion World War One was the main trigger and the Romanov misrule was the main long-term cause. I am quite sure that if the autocratic system of government had been abolished before the 1900 there would have been a different social structure and economy. It is not for me to say whether it would have turned out better than an autocratic system. For the same reason, the number a strength of opposition groups could have been different and the influence of Rasputin as well. The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) Page 3 of 3 The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Source G is a report that was made to the Duma in 1916 by Rodzyenko, the president of the Duma. The president informed the Duma that General Ruzsky had complained about the overall conditions that the Russian soldiers were battling in.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Q7 It is complicated to come to a final conclusion of whether Stalin was a man or a monster. Stalin is the man responsible for the industrialization of Russia, however he is also responsible for the death of millions of Russians.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    This deception he had in people led to him being a deceiving person himself where he deceived Trotsky at Lenin's funeral. Because of Stalin's suspicion, everything was censored in the NKVD and Stalin's opponents would be deleted from pictures history books etc.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    The April Theses became the basis of the party's policy. This brought the Bolsheviks much support and made them into strong competition against the provisional Government. In October 1917 the Bolsheviks staged a coup to take over the provisional Government in Petrograd.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Arguably, after inferring with other sources, I believe there is a considerable element of reliability in Source D as some of the information in this account is similar to that of sources. To start with, both Sources C and D agree that all the members of the Russian Royal family

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    An internal struggle is necessary to overcome these vacillations. This occurred in the Bolshevik Party after Lenin's return to Russia, when the Bolshevik leaders in Petrograd (mainly Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin) adopted a conciliatory attitude to the Provisional Government and even considered fusing with the Mensheviks.

  1. What Happened To the Romanov Family?

    Sokolov also seems to contradict what Sergeyev said, as at the start of his account it read, "My predecessor, Sergeyev, on handing this case to me, had no doubt about the fact that the entire Romanov family had been massacred in the Ipatiev house."

  2. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    He was weak willed and disillusioned, completely out of touch with the desperate conditions that his people where forced to live in. We can also see that his wife had strong hold over the decisions that Nicholas made. He even referred to himself as "a poor little weak-willed" man.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work