• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Tssar's fall from power.

Extracts from this document...


Question Three Was any one reason from the list more important than the others in the Tssar's fall from power. (12 marks) Answer Three From the list given, there is no one clear factor that is more important than another is. It is difficult to pinpoint one factor as "the most important". I think this is because they are all linked in one way or another. Romanov misrule was certainly the factor that was rooted deepest into Russian history (from about 1616). Ever since then there has been economic hardship among a huge proportion of the Russian people, because of its social structure. I do not think that I can truly say that Romanov misrule is the most important reason for the fall of the Tsar, and the March 1917 revolution. If it was more important than all the others, why did the revolution not happen earlier? The answer is that it was enough on its own, other factors became apparent and contributed to the bad atmosphere in Russia, and the bad attitude towards the Tsar and his family. ...read more.


and Rasputin (an immoral, religious peasant), many situations arose. The Tsarina would not work with the Duma, and dismissed many able ministers. Therefore, no proper organisation took place concerning food, fuel and other supplies. The railway system fell into chaos and trainloads of food were left rotting. Many male peasants were conscripted into the Army and therefore there was a shortage of farm workers and less food was being produced. Many factories closed so industrial goods were in short supply. As food shortages increased, prices rose, leading to starvation and strikes among the factory workers. As the news came to the Russian peasants that many soldiers were left unfed and badly equipped, more uproar arose. Many Russians did not even know why they were fighting in World War I. Although the others were not less important factors than World War I, they did not set off the Revolution. World War I was a trigger of the March 1917 Revolution, making all other factors more apparent. ...read more.


* Without social and economic hardship, would there have been a revolution? * If Rasputin had not been involved, would there have been a revolution? * If there were no opposition groups, would there have been a revolution? * If World War I had not occurred, could the peace of Russia have been maintained? In all honesty, there is no way of saying which one is more important. They all contributed in their own way to the violent revolts among the Russian people during the 20th century. In my opinion World War One was the main trigger and the Romanov misrule was the main long-term cause. I am quite sure that if the autocratic system of government had been abolished before the 1900 there would have been a different social structure and economy. It is not for me to say whether it would have turned out better than an autocratic system. For the same reason, the number a strength of opposition groups could have been different and the influence of Rasputin as well. The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) Page 3 of 3 The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This could mean that some of the things he says might not be true because he was never actually there at the time of the murders of the family. On the other hand, everything he says could be true because he has had a lot of time to look at all the facts and what everyone believes.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    This means that it is less likely that the information is incorrect, however there is still a large possibility that it is biased, as the British government held similar views on communism to the American government. The fact that the two sources are written in the same year (1918)

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster?

    Finally taking source C, we can see by looking at it that it has no date nor situation attached. With these problems we have no idea when the photograph may have been taken or where. However by looking at the photograph alone we can see that it is very much positive.

  2. The Fall of the Tsar

    While it is not reliable, it does not disprove either of the sources. As it doesn't actually tell us that much about Rasputin, there isn't as much to disprove, but it still agrees about the womanising Rasputin seems to have, perhaps the Tsarina is just one of these women.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    Source G is a report that was made to the Duma in 1916 by Rodzyenko, the president of the Duma. The president informed the Duma that General Ruzsky had complained about the overall conditions that the Russian soldiers were battling in.

  2. Lenin's Role in History

    It was believed that Lenin thought that no one person had the qualities to lead the party as he had. In the month that Lenin died Trotsky was away in the Caucasus and Lenin telegraphed him and said that the funeral would be held immediately so there was no point in taking the long trip back to Moscow.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    He was anxious for the masses to involve themselves in the running of industry and the state. In December 1917 Lenin wrote: "One of the most important tasks of today, if not the most important, is to develop [the] independent initiative of the workers, and of all the working

  2. Stalin man or monster

    Concluding the credibility of Source F the fact it was published in Paris, is significant as France was a capitalist country that opposed communism, and thus was against Stalin and his communist policies. One can say the source is biased however, it is much more reliable then source E for a number of reason.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work