• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Tssar's fall from power.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question Three Was any one reason from the list more important than the others in the Tssar's fall from power. (12 marks) Answer Three From the list given, there is no one clear factor that is more important than another is. It is difficult to pinpoint one factor as "the most important". I think this is because they are all linked in one way or another. Romanov misrule was certainly the factor that was rooted deepest into Russian history (from about 1616). Ever since then there has been economic hardship among a huge proportion of the Russian people, because of its social structure. I do not think that I can truly say that Romanov misrule is the most important reason for the fall of the Tsar, and the March 1917 revolution. If it was more important than all the others, why did the revolution not happen earlier? The answer is that it was enough on its own, other factors became apparent and contributed to the bad atmosphere in Russia, and the bad attitude towards the Tsar and his family. ...read more.

Middle

and Rasputin (an immoral, religious peasant), many situations arose. The Tsarina would not work with the Duma, and dismissed many able ministers. Therefore, no proper organisation took place concerning food, fuel and other supplies. The railway system fell into chaos and trainloads of food were left rotting. Many male peasants were conscripted into the Army and therefore there was a shortage of farm workers and less food was being produced. Many factories closed so industrial goods were in short supply. As food shortages increased, prices rose, leading to starvation and strikes among the factory workers. As the news came to the Russian peasants that many soldiers were left unfed and badly equipped, more uproar arose. Many Russians did not even know why they were fighting in World War I. Although the others were not less important factors than World War I, they did not set off the Revolution. World War I was a trigger of the March 1917 Revolution, making all other factors more apparent. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Without social and economic hardship, would there have been a revolution? * If Rasputin had not been involved, would there have been a revolution? * If there were no opposition groups, would there have been a revolution? * If World War I had not occurred, could the peace of Russia have been maintained? In all honesty, there is no way of saying which one is more important. They all contributed in their own way to the violent revolts among the Russian people during the 20th century. In my opinion World War One was the main trigger and the Romanov misrule was the main long-term cause. I am quite sure that if the autocratic system of government had been abolished before the 1900 there would have been a different social structure and economy. It is not for me to say whether it would have turned out better than an autocratic system. For the same reason, the number a strength of opposition groups could have been different and the influence of Rasputin as well. The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) Page 3 of 3 The Russian Revolution History Coursework July 2001 Camilla Marcus-Dew 10.4(3) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Lenin's Role in History

    Thus Stalin forced Trotsky into being absent from the funeral and took a prominent and very public role in the mourning of the late leader. However, Lenin's Testament, which warned the party against Stalin and suggested that he should be taken out of leadership, was read at the next Central Committee meeting.

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    All these men were executed during the 1930's. Yagoda was falsely accused of spying for Japan and Germany, and plotting to kill Lenin. Zinoviev and Kamenev were two men who helped Stalin come into power, but after Stalin did not require their services anymore he accused Zinoviev of plotting with

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    The Russian soldiers kneel down to the Tsar, which might be thought of as respectful but may also be seen as weakness. In England, they would have saluted the flag not the ruler.

  2. Stalin man or monster

    in the same century as Stalin," this quote portrays the happiness of people living within the same time frame as Stalin as though he was some kind of religious figure. Stalin is shown to be some what of a hero and a fine leader through source E.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    They never believed that they could hold power in Russia alone. It is a striking testimony to the vitality of the October Revolution that, in spite of all the vicissitudes, all the crimes of Stalinism and the terrible destruction of the second world war, the basic conquests were maintained for

  2. Stalin- Man or Monster?

    that he will never be like these leaders because he cares about people and appreciates them. However, though this source portrays a good image of Stalin as a caring and thoughtful man, we still cannot say that it provides us any real evidence because not only was it written by Stalin himself, but also when he was in exile.

  1. What caused the Romanov Dynasty to fall? Explain the fall and decline of the ...

    However, there were significant limitations on their freedom. They paid redemption payments (compensation) for the land, which had been 'given' to them. Peasants continued to use old fashioned farming methods and their living standards were poor. From 1880 onwards, the Russian government encouraged industrial growth. Many peasants began to leave the countryside in the hope of a better life in towns and cities.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Both sources contradict each other, which makes them both a bit unreliable. On the other hand, source B backs up what Sergeyev says about only some members were shot. This could mean that source C is contradicting the other two sources because it states different things.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work