• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military supremacy. However the USA failed to use this supremacy efficiently to defeat a smaller less advanced enemy? Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vietnam Coursework; Question Two. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military supremacy. However the USA failed to use this supremacy efficiently to defeat a smaller less advanced enemy? Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using sources D-K and knowledge from your studies. I agree that America failed to use its supremacy to defeat a smaller less advanced country, Vietnam. We can see this from the fact that the US was able to help defeat the Nazis, the Japanese and Koreans before Vietnam, and those countries were much more developed than Vietnam. In this essay I will express my feelings on the Vietnam War using facts and my own opinions to prove that the US failed to use their supremacy effectively. Firstly, Source D shows us a bar chart showing the amount of US Troops in Vietnam, we can say it is reliable because it is based on fact and is very similar to ones in our text books, however it has no details showing where it comes from so it cant be useful in that sense, but we can easily double check and see that it is aligned with other charts of the same standing. We can see that after the 1968-69 Tet Offensive, a lot of Us Troops came to Vietnam to support the NVA and we can see the dramatic fall of troops after the Offensive going down from 500,000 to a mere 20-40,000 range. ...read more.

Middle

Source F tells us what Saturation/Carpet bombing was like during the Vietnam War by the B-52 Bombers, this source has no name on it, so we don't know whose side it comes from, however by the context we can guess that it is American. The source does not mention why carpet bombing was used and how it was used, it only mentions the effects of it. We can use this source to back up the claim that the US was more advanced because of the power they had, however the source doesn't back up the military supremacy part of the question, because it doesn't show that American used the Saturation bombing effectively. Unlike the previous sources this has some information to where it comes from. So I think this source is useful in the sense that it proves America had technological supremacy but it shows no signs of military tactical supremacy or if the US Air force used the supremacy effectively to defeat the smaller and less advanced army of North Vietnam. Source G tells us the devastating effects of Napalm, The source shows where it comes from and we can trust it is reliable. This source is British and shows a neutral view on Napalm. While it tells us how the Americans used it, it doesn't show the effects it had on the Vietnamese people who was scarred by it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source J shows us how the troops felt about the Vietnamese, it shows that they were scared of them, because the NVA didn't have a set uniform the US wasn't sure who was a part of the NVA and who was a civilian and as a result that they would not trust a single one of them, because if they misplaced their trust it could be the last thing they do. Source J shows that the Vietcong was so successful in hiding that they were able to pass away as civilians. Source J does show details of where it came from and I believe it can be relied on. It proves that the Vietcong were very successful in their guerrilla war, and their ability to hit and hide was remarkable, while the source backs that up, it has no mention on the US tactics and doesn't help me decided if America was effective in using their 'Supremacy' of Military and Technology during the Vietnam War. In my conclusion, I believe that the sources do not provide enough evidence to prove that the US didn't use their Military and Technological Supremacy effectively. However using the sources with my own knowledge helps me further my claim that the US didn't use superior tactics to win the Vietnam War, and as a result have embarrassed themselves forever on the Global stage. By Lewis Burroughs 10 Newman Miss Cleave History ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Describe the military tactics used by both the USA and the Vietcong forces in ...

    In these areas should anything move they would be shot or even napalmed. An essential part of the guerrilla warfare involved using the lush canopy of the jungle as cover from all sides. The US used a chemical defoliant, Agent Orange on the countryside to make the guerrilla tactics less effective.

  2. History Controlled Assesment- Success' of USA military

    Although they were incredibly brave for accepting the missions, they were not welcomed as heroes by the US public. The US public opinion was mixed at the time. People with a strong sense of Patriotism, rich people and people from a high class, supported the war, others hated and despised it.

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    withdrew all of the troops out of the war or after the war had ended. In 1965 the amount of troops began to increase rapidly this was because the Americans new that they were loosing the war, however in 1968 a new president took over America.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    and protests would never have achieved the kind of momentum they did. As such, we can logically associate Source J with the final source and make the assumption that it does fundamentally support the theory presented within Source M. The penultimate source, Source K, is an opinion poll conducted by

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    So he may have chosen to mention these things because they suggest the ordinary soldiers are victims who couldn't fight effectively in the war. He was also trying to show how it was the American government's fault; they let this happen.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The war cost the US a large number of casualties reaching 543,500 in 1969. The other factor was that the Americans were unable to get the locals on their side. The locals were mainly poor peasants and the Vietcong influenced them into believing that the Americans were bad and they would take away their land and cause destruction.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Haig was warning the public, he was very honest in telling people this, which is why he was so liked. This part of the source does not talk about Haig's skill or efficiency as a soldier but it might help morale and that would help Britain to victory so it

  2. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    In 1966 Fulbright testified at Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings on U.S. policy toward China and Vietnam. Fulbright, who was chairman of the committee, warned that U.S. engagement in Vietnam could lead to a war with China. The most influential hearing was in 1971 which included John Kerry?s testimony which caused a huge stir and protests.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work