• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests"

Extracts from this document...


Milestone 2 19/10/05 "The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests" How far do you agree with this view? PLAN 1) British Foreign Policy interests at the time Peace - Britain had everything to lose and nothing to gain from a war. Balance of Power - Best insurance against renewal of war. Global interests rather than just continental. Preservation of empire Preservation of navy - had best navy fleet. Remain on good terms with USA - expenses. Britain needed to be defended - Security of UK - Protection of trade routes - Defence of the empire - Co-operate in defence of British allies. 2) The main aims of the Versailles settlement Make it so that Germany could not gain power (military or other) and cause threat. Reparations to be paid Army and navy cut (100,000 men) Acceptance of war guilt Union of Austria and Germany banned Demilitarisation of Rhineland and occupation of Ruhr 3) What British Government thought about the Treaty. Unfair to Germany - Peace should be restored 4) How it did secure British foreign policy. Meant that Germany could not expand - No threat to Britain With reparations to pay Britain could get some money to rebuild bigger army German Navy belittled, meant Britain had no threat of being challenged If Britain agreed with USA this wouldn't lead to conflict. ...read more.


The German navy was similarly reduced and Germany was forbidden to build major weapons of aggression, contributing to them not being able to build a strong enough army or weapons to fight with. Germany, after futile protests, accepted the treaty, which became effective in January 1920. The vital clauses that were included in the treaty were that Germany had to admit full responsibility for starting the war. This was Clause 231 - the infamous "War Guilt Clause", which angered many Germans, the British also thought that this was harsh on Germany, the clause was mainly introduced by the French and the USA. Germany, as she was responsible for starting the war as stated in clause 231, was, therefore responsible for all the war damage caused by the First World War. Therefore, she had to pay reparations, the bulk of which would go to France and Belgium to pay for the damage done to the infrastructure of both countries by the war. Quite literally, reparations would be used to pay for the damage to be repaired. However Britain was angry that they were not stated to get any of this money that was to be paid back, this would have helped with British expenses such as building up its army in defence for itself and its allies. ...read more.


As far as restrictions on armaments were concerned, they failed to prevent German rearmament because the victorious powers did not have the will to enforce them. That will was lacking especially in Britain, which was most critical of the Versailles Treaty. The British anxious to demobilize, were reluctant also to assume obligations which would provide France with an alternative scheme of security to that which required the crippling of Germany. The Peace settlement of 1919 had many positive and negative effects on British Foreign Policy and the government. British Foreign Policy was dictated by the principle of "balance of power". British politicians believed that Europe after Versailles had become dominated by France and her continental allies, and therefore these countries should be opposed and Germany should become strengthened against them. Also, the irrational British dislike of France and especially of Poland contributed towards the crystallization of a consistent, British anti-Versailles policy, which favoured the slow revival of German power and brought about the overthrowing of the system of Versailles by the conference of Munich and the destruction of Czechoslovakia, and finally by the Second World War. It would seem that there are more ways in which it did not secure British Foreign Policy than ways in which it did, this may be because foreign policy, although should have played a role in the Versailles treaty, revolved more around what Britain needed than the international affairs and what would have helped its allies. ?? ?? ?? ?? - Louise Arrundale - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    The Coal Commissions that belongs to Allies must become a part of the league of nation and must include Germany as representative. Tariffs, a free trade union, must be established in the League. No protectionist tariffs must be established.

  2. The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles in Addressing the Causes of ...

    in resolving minor disputes, it could not completely restore peace and normality, and it was weak from the self interests of the major powers (permanent members)

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    no more secret treaties 2) countries must seek to reduce their weapons and their armed forces 3) national self-determination should allow people of the same nationality to govern themselves and one nationality should not have the power to govern another 4) all countries should belong to the League of Nations.

  2. "A study of British foreign policy in the 1920's suggests that British governments increasingly ...

    as a court of appeal to readjust crudities, irregularities and injustices" The American senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles and so the US failed to join the League of Nations. As part of the treaty there were many territorial changes.

  1. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    In fact, the Balkan region - a region of the decaying Ottoman Empire - was a ripe for conquest between Russia and Austria-Hungary, in the case of Russia it was due to ethnic reasons and for Austria-Hungary it was simply because they represented a threat to the stability of the regime.

  2. "Castlereagh's foreign policy 1815-1822 was more successful than Canning's foreign policy 1822-1827" - Explain ...

    He instead sent his half brother, Lord Stuart, as an observer. The Congress of Laibach 1821 was the same as Toppau in reference to Castlereagh's disapproval and he again sent Lord Stuart to show his disapproval. At Laibach, Austria and Russia were ready to send soldiers against Italian revolts and

  1. Explain how the failure of collective security and German foreign policy goals and achievements ...

    ?too far.? Its geographic distance gave little care to the ?European Club? as hatefully named by Japan. In the end, Manchuria was fully invaded by Japan. Both crises were treated with an unserious and ineffective manner.

  2. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    It was known as the Nazi-Soviet Pact. This agreement helped Hitler gain the comfort of not having to fight a war on both fronts, since he knew he would not last long if he did. Hitler hated communists, but knew that the only way he would stand a chance was with Stalin as an ally.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work