• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Vietnam War - why the USA became involved and how the media covered the war.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vietnam Coursework Question 1 The Vietnam War lasted from August 1964 to April 1975. In 1964 the American President, Lyndon Baines Johnson used the Gulf of Tonkin incident to get Congress to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This allowed him to wage all out war against North Vietnam without ever getting an official declaration of war. This signalled the beginning of American involvement in the war until 1973, when they ended the draft and began to pull out their troops. But why did they get involved in the first place? In 1947, President Harry Truman made a speech to Congress outlining his plans for the Cold War. He said "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." He was outlining the American foreign policy of containment. In Source A, President Johnson references the Truman Doctrine when he says "Since 1954 every American President has offered support to the people of South Vietnam" When he made the decision to expand American influence with Operation Rolling Thunder, his justification was the policy of containment. ...read more.

Middle

Another well respected anchorman Walter Cronkite said "What the hell is going on? I thought we were winning this war" when he saw the footage of the attack on the Saigon embassy. President Johnson's reaction to this was "If I've lost Walter Cronkite, I've lost Mr Average Citizen." Cronkite's opinion would influence millions of Americans and the war had managed to alienate him. Photo's like Source E showed the kind of images that shocked people. It shows two children who were hit with napalm running away while American soldiers stand and take photos. This picture could have been enticed a bad reaction out of the people who saw it. It could have also been edited extensively. In the original photo, the background shows smoke rising from the children's village that had just been destroyed. This possible editing of the source affects its usefulness but this doesn't affect the fact that the soldiers who were supposed to help them were taking pictures of their suffering. Source F is from an American journalist in 1970. Despite the war being largely documented by the media, the fact that it is by limits the usefulness of the source because he could have been very selective about what he was writing about and leave out anything good that the American's were doing or anything bad that the North Vietnamese did. ...read more.

Conclusion

What the hell do you think we accomplished by doing this?" Many of the soldiers did not see the massacre as doing anything wrong. This was the effect of the war on the young men who fought. Nearly 500 civilians were slaughtered at My Lai and no one saw anything wrong with it. The American public however were appalled that their soldiers could commit such acts of atrocity and the media didn't help. Pictures were broadcast showing the scenes of horror at My Lai and this turned even more people against the war than ever before. The Vietnam War was the world's first ever televised war. It was also a devastating loss for the United States. Each of the sources provides evidence to support media being an important reason behind the defeat of America. However, not all of the sources are completely unbiased. For example, Source D is a North Vietnamese poster and is therefore very biased in support of the Viet Cong and against the American troops. Despite this, sources such as Source E, Source F and Source J, provide evidence which is mainly unbiased although it is limited to some extent. Because of this, I believe that there is sufficient evidence in the sources to claim that media was an important reason behind why America lost the war. ?? ?? ?? ?? Ben Storrie 11N ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Why did America lose the Vietnam War?

    As billions and billions of US tax dollars began to be pumped into the war, less and less money was going into education and health care. America had 500,000 soldiers in Vietnam, at a cost of 2 billion dollars every month.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    It is however useful is helping us to understand why America was not able to win over the Vietnamese people and how the American methods left Vietnam devastated. Source G: Source G is the reaction of an American soldier after having heard about the My Lai massacre.

  1. The USA should have been successful in Vietnam because of its technological and military ...

    worse than it was because he wanted to make them sound bad. The film 'platoon' was a good piece of information because you can see what it was like in the jungle during the Vietnam War; however you couldn't really tell exactly what it was like on the film because

  2. Why was USA involved in Vietnam War?

    and anti-communist South Vietnam, lead by Ngo Dinh Diem (with support from USA). Responding to the defeat of the French by the Vietminh at Dien Bien Phu, in 1954 President Eisenhower outlined the Domino Theory: "You have a row of dominoes set up.

  1. American reactions to the vietnam war

    However it is also quite unobjective, as there is a certain amount of emotive language used, for example 'mob' and 'chased down'. It also contains a quote which arguably justifies the attack, explaining that one of the construction workers was doing it for his brother who was wounded in Vietnam.

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    Most of the American Public were protestant and Johnson himself was a devoted Protestant therefore by quoting this from the bible he was influencing a lot of people. The speech seems to be an excuse, a cover up for going in to Vietnam.

  1. How coverage of Vietnam in the USA led to demands for peace

    Even though the Communists did not succeed as they had hoped, only killing five people, it was the capture of Saigon?s main radio station building, which they only held for a few hours, that shocked the nation as they could not understand how amateur communist soldiers were even able to

  2. Why did America lose the War in Vietnam?

    civilians in three hours, despite there being no males of fighting age. Attacks like this were not unusual however most were covered up. However in this case the media back at home reported the massacre even after the initial cover up, which gave the US public an insight into the cruelty of their country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work