• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The year 1924-29 were golden ones for the Weimar Republic' Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


'The year 1924-29 were golden ones for the Weimar Republic' Do you agree with this statement? There are two sides to this statement. I am going to view the positive side first and then I will talk about some of the problems. In the golden years of the Weimar Republic came economic recovery and stability. The man at the forefront of success for Weimar was Stresemann. He was chancellor for only one year (1923) but still remained in mainstream politics as the Foreign Minister for 6 years (1923-29). The first economic measure he took was to stop the (money) printing presses. This would slowly put inflation back to normal levels, end money losing its value by the second and hopefully bring prices back down. Another way to bring down prices was to increase the produce. This was done by ending the passive resistance in the Ruhr. ...read more.


Stresemann also got the Nobel Peace Prize and the Kellogg pact was a treaty signed for no more war. During the golden years international relations greatly improved by Stresemann making many compromises. This bought the Republic time to rebuild the country (and a secret army, which trained in Russia). In many respect the Golden Years were a great time for Germany but there were some problems as well. With the payment of reparations resumed Germany was heavily dependant on short-term U.S loans. This meant that if the U.S decided to stop the loans then Germany would collapse again. Also the fact that short-term loans were given meant that America could ask for the money back any time. The problem was it had been invested in long term projects making it very difficult for the Germans to pay back some of their loans. ...read more.


From this we can tell that people still had old views. In conclusion I believe that Stresemann had a plan that was for the short-term. His measures wouldn't have worked in the long-term. Germany couldn't have kept up with reparation and arguments would have broken out with France, Britain and the U.S. Stresemann also relied heavily on U.S loans, which meant if ever the U.S pulled the plug then the German economy would have been left with nothing. Also the measures that Stresemann took to make peace with the Allies didn't go down very well with the public, meaning that other parties with the right polices could steal the vote. It was always the German view to take revenge but with the amount of pacts Stresemann had made any military action would have made the allies show no mercy and would guarantee no sympathy. All in all Stresemann's plans were not the ones to follow in order to determine a prosperous future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far was 1924-29 a golden age in weimar germany?

    The Young Plan also was not liked, because of its decisiveness about the reparations. Some Germans believed Germany should not have been forced to pay any reparations at all. The Locarno treaty had several faults, one of which was its failure to secure Germany's Eastern borders as well as her Western ones.

  2. How golden were the "Golden years"1924-29?

    There were some worrying features on the political scene. Despite their small numbers extremists on the right and left wing engaged into regular street battles. Again I conclude that the political side seemed to be going well and "golden on the surface" but there was still potential for extremists to gain votes.

  1. To what extent can the years 1924 – 1929 be described as “Golden” ones ...

    Although Stresemann was at the Political turn point for Germany he only got the ball rolling. He only served as Chancellor for a mere 103 days in August - November 1923. The Governments in Weimar Germany 1924 - 1929 were incredibly unstable.

  2. What problems did the Weimar Republic face from 1919 to 1923, and why did ...

    This, however, led to the collapse of the German economy, as the government was forced to print more paper money in order to pay the striking workers in the Ruhr. This caused hyperinflation as Germany was not producing anything; its industrial heartland had been destroyed and yet the number of notes in its economy was increasing.

  1. The Weimar Republic: "the Golden Years" 1924-1929.

    Stresemann wanted International Cooperation. He believed Germany's best chance for recovery came from working with other countries. c) Diagram showing the flow of money between Europe and the USA following the introduction of the Dawes Plan. d) Nationalist critics who felt the Dawes plan made Germany a slave to the

  2. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    of gaining public notice in the fight between sympathisers." Lord Bullock "In Berlin the violence of the SA's street battles with the Communists alienated public opinion and led the police to secure a ban on the Nazi organisation in the capital."

  1. 'Was 1924-29 a Golden Age for the WeimarRepublic? '

    In the 1920s these gave way to Zeittheater and Zeitoper, literally theatre and opera 'of the time'. These works were set in society of the time and included greater realism. Berlin became famous for its nightlife. Alongside the theatre and the cinemas was a vibrant nightclub scene with daring floor shows.

  2. Was 1924-29 A Political And Economic Golden Age?

    during this period, a decrease in days lost in strikes, a dramatic reduction in the annual budget deficit (due to both Dawes and Young Plan), big increases in steel, coal and other forms of industrial production, and generally a much greater standard of living.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work