• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The year 1924-29 were golden ones for the Weimar Republic' Do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...


'The year 1924-29 were golden ones for the Weimar Republic' Do you agree with this statement? There are two sides to this statement. I am going to view the positive side first and then I will talk about some of the problems. In the golden years of the Weimar Republic came economic recovery and stability. The man at the forefront of success for Weimar was Stresemann. He was chancellor for only one year (1923) but still remained in mainstream politics as the Foreign Minister for 6 years (1923-29). The first economic measure he took was to stop the (money) printing presses. This would slowly put inflation back to normal levels, end money losing its value by the second and hopefully bring prices back down. Another way to bring down prices was to increase the produce. This was done by ending the passive resistance in the Ruhr. ...read more.


Stresemann also got the Nobel Peace Prize and the Kellogg pact was a treaty signed for no more war. During the golden years international relations greatly improved by Stresemann making many compromises. This bought the Republic time to rebuild the country (and a secret army, which trained in Russia). In many respect the Golden Years were a great time for Germany but there were some problems as well. With the payment of reparations resumed Germany was heavily dependant on short-term U.S loans. This meant that if the U.S decided to stop the loans then Germany would collapse again. Also the fact that short-term loans were given meant that America could ask for the money back any time. The problem was it had been invested in long term projects making it very difficult for the Germans to pay back some of their loans. ...read more.


From this we can tell that people still had old views. In conclusion I believe that Stresemann had a plan that was for the short-term. His measures wouldn't have worked in the long-term. Germany couldn't have kept up with reparation and arguments would have broken out with France, Britain and the U.S. Stresemann also relied heavily on U.S loans, which meant if ever the U.S pulled the plug then the German economy would have been left with nothing. Also the measures that Stresemann took to make peace with the Allies didn't go down very well with the public, meaning that other parties with the right polices could steal the vote. It was always the German view to take revenge but with the amount of pacts Stresemann had made any military action would have made the allies show no mercy and would guarantee no sympathy. All in all Stresemann's plans were not the ones to follow in order to determine a prosperous future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How far was 1924-29 a golden age in weimar germany?

    The Young Plan also was not liked, because of its decisiveness about the reparations. Some Germans believed Germany should not have been forced to pay any reparations at all. The Locarno treaty had several faults, one of which was its failure to secure Germany's Eastern borders as well as her Western ones.

  2. 'Was 1924-29 a Golden Age for the WeimarRepublic? '

    However as with so many other features of Weimar Germany, there was tension and conflict just below the surface. On the whole the daring lifestyle and ideas which characterised 1920's Berlin were not to be found in other parts of Germany, where people were shocked by liberal attitudes.

  1. The Weimar Republic: "the Golden Years" 1924-1929.

    Countries now felt Germany were part of Europe and were no longer outcasts, they were seen to be equal with Europe, and that if they invaded another country, trading may be stopped. 10a) Three examples of political stability of Weimar Germany in the late 1920s: * Germany were given 58

  2. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    A second round was needed, and a reshuffling of party support occurred. The SPD, ZP and DDP now supported Wilhelm Marx. The parties of the Right felt that Jarres could not beat Marx, so looked for a new candidate. They chose the 78-year-old Field Marshal Paulus von Hindenburg.

  1. How golden were the "Golden years"1924-29?

    Stresemann's idea became real when The Wall Street Crash led to the withdrawal of American loans which financed the recovery of 1924. As a consequence of this unemployment shot up to 4 million in 1931. I conclude that the German economy was "Golden" on the surface but really it was not golden at all.

  2. "The Weimar Republic Was Destined To Fail From The Moment It signed The Armistice ...

    Many Germans hated the Treaty and the Weimer Republic was blamed for signing it and was used by the German people who hated the new democracy and preferred the autocratic rule of the Kaiser as an excuse to hate the entire republic.

  1. It was a miracle that the Weimar Republic lasted until 1924. How far do ...

    but also the German people were a very proud country and were massively proud of their achievements including their army. Without this army the country lacked a strong defensive system, which was crucial to Germany incase of any hostility from neighboring countries, another reason for a lack in confidence from the people.

  2. Was 1924-29 A Political And Economic Golden Age?

    If however Germany was in such a great economic state in this period, why is it that the Depression of 1929 could have a such a profound effect? The only explanations could be that there were already major flaws in the economy which, on the surface seemed to be extremely healthy, was not actually so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work