• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The year of 1919 had Europe's feet placed firmly on the ground. It was now the end of the infamous World War I and the Paris Peace Treaties

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The year of 1919 had Europe's feet placed firmly on the ground. It was now the end of the infamous World War I and the Paris Peace Treaties were now being exposed to the world and specifically to Germany and its alliances. Their fate was in the hands of the victorious countries of Europe that demanded a great deal out of the main causes of this war. They demanded their revenge and the humiliation of the Central Powers through signatures followed by direct actions that highlighted their requests. Many nations were involved in the post-war agreements, each attempting to benefit from the disaster in their own ways. The treaties introduced economic benefits, self-determination, and military benefits to many of the winning nations. The treaties also helped show how power played an enormous role on the future of the Central Powers. National Prestige was shining during this time from the powerful nations that played a big part on the Central Powers' outcome. They proved and maintained their integrity as powerful countries through stripping the Central Powers of their pride and integrity as countries. The "Big Three" introduced most of the regulations in the treaties, these regulations were thought of extensively and rationally. ...read more.

Middle

Kaiser stirred up some problems through offering the Sultan help to remove French colonialism. This act nearly broke into a war because Britain and France forced Germany to withdraw from Morocco. At this state, Germany has placed itself as the main cause of the First World War. The Paris Peace Treaties were formed after the war had ended in 1919. These treaties were formed to control and punish the main cause of the war. Germany and its allies which were also recognized as the Central Powers were given different harsh treaties to sign as a punishment for losing the war. President Woodrow Wilson began the treaties with his fourteen points. The main theme behind his points emphasized the need for self-determination and democracy. Many of the European nations disregarded his ideas and diverted their attention on another treaty. The Treaty of Versailles was written for Germany. This treaty was obviously the harshest due to the fact that it was intended for Germany mainly because it was the main cause behind the war. The treaty declared Germany to be completely responsible for the war. Germany lost one-eighth of its land and 6,500,000 people in the East. It also lost all its colonies, one-sixth of its agricultural lands, and a tenth of its factories. ...read more.

Conclusion

The tension between the Central Powers and the victorious powers has just grown and not decreased, these harsh punishments did nothing to relieve the tension that was already created. This tension helped the world merge into its next World War in 1939. The Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to suffer from unemployment and inflation. They protested against the treaty in an attempt to regain some prestige. The German people were annoyed with their government so they decided to set up a republic. This did not work; a lot of communist ideas began to spread and finally threw out the republic. This problem introduced World War II. Apparently, The Paris Peace Treaty provided a sub-treaty that indirectly caused another World War; this shows how it did not exactly resolve the problems. Post-war treaties do not necessarily help mend the problems faced in wars. The victorious countries usually want the obligations made in the treaties to benefit their economy and military. They usually disregard the tension and probability of a next war occurring. In this case, one war leads to another through a treaty whose main purpose was to resolve problems and not escalate them. The Paris Peace Treaty was greatly unsuccessful and should be used as a tool to learn from the leaders of the worlds' mistakes. "The failures of yesterday are the learnings of tomorrow." Roberto Baggio ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    Turkey was also made to pay reparations. This was fair, Non-Turkish people in the Turkish Empire had the right to be free and have their own governments. The Treaty of S�vres angered Turkey and the Treaty was revised in 1923 and Turkey regained the land that it lost to Greece and no longer had to pay reparations.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    This was a very harsh treaty. Why was Turkey treated this way ? Memories were still clear to many people on the Allied side of what had happened at Gallipoli when the ANZACS suffered appalling losses at the hands of the Turks in what was one of the the Allies greatest defeat of World War One.

  1. Explain the different aims of the three leaders, Clemenceau, Lloyd-George, and Wilson at the ...

    by common action of international obligations..."12 This too was another of the League's aims: they wanted to enforce disarmament so that there would be less of a threat of military attacks against any nation. In the situation where one state attacked another, the League was established so that its' members could effectively and collectively restrain the offender.

  2. Causes of World War 2

    Hitler saw such golden opportunities unfold. Chamberlain of Britain had continuously agreed with giving Hitler land in the policy of appeasement when the Sudetenland and the Rhineland were taken over by Hitler. Clearly when Czechoslovakia was finally taken over by Hitler Chamberlain was no longer seen as a good leader of Britain anymore.

  1. "Tension between the countries of Europe increased in year before 1914 due to the ...

    There was some other tension such as countries did not have trust on one another so they signed treaties with one another to help each other if war was to occur. In the Dual Alliance ion 1879 it shows that there was tension between countries and other nations wanted to have a team of nations i.e.

  2. Why did war break out in Europe in 1939

    in Britain thought Germany had the right to be united with Austria anyway. Hitler grew more confident that Britain and France would not make a move against him. Around the same time as this was happening the Homeland Party, the Nazis of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, were supplied with money

  1. How fair were the Paris Peace Treaties

    This means that the Germans had voluntarily stepped into a battle that had not previously involved them; the Germans had helped in making the war much larger. The Treaty was fair as the Germans had stepped into battle voluntarily know what the consequences would have been.

  2. Why did international peace collapse in 1939?

    ?It will be asked how it was possible that the Soviet government signed a non-aggression pact with so deceitful a nation, with such criminals as Hitler and Ribbentrop? We secured peace for our country for eighteen months, which enabled us to make military preparations.? (Stalin in a speech, 1941)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work