• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of knowledge

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of knowledge: Altansunar Onur What are the methods of the historians and how do they compare with other methodologies: First of all, we have to know what is the definition of history: It is a branch of knowledge dealing with past events, political, social, economic, of a country, continent, or the world. It is an orderly description of past events. It is also a train of events connected with a person or thing. Secondly I will define what is a method. It is 1) a system, orderliness, 2) it is a way of doing something 3) doing things with 4) it is a science or study of something. The differences between the facts of the past and historical facts: We all know, or think we know, what a fact is: a reliable piece of information, something we know to be, in the common sense meaning of the word "true". We also know, or think we know, what an historical fact is. Give examples. These are facts, definite pieces of historical knowledge, close perhaps to the natural scientific knowledge the nineteenth century historians wanted to use as their model of knowledge. But these facts are only the start of history, only the foundation on which history is built. ...read more.

Middle

They are archivists and curators, collectors and preservers. E.G: Nothing is moved until photographs are taken, measurements made and meticulous records compiled of everything that is there and exactly where it is. That is the work of the historical researchers who record and preserve evidence from the past. Every objects is recorded and, as far as possible identified. The historical knowledge these Historians have is no different from the knowledge of natural science: it is empirical and of course objective. Give example of the titanic. 2) Assessment: These historians asses the evidence they have, compare it to other similar evidences that might be available and come to the conclusion that Holden's room are indeed a unique historical event. 3) Reconstructing the past: Having assessed the evidence and accepted its importance, historians now have to use it, to infer from it and to reconstruct the past. They use evidences. Historians also are interested in reconstructing beyond the obvious. They attempt to reconstruct the values of a wealthy youth 100 years ago. 4) Interpreting: Historians ask themselves questions. They might compare the artefacts with other atifacts for instance... Historians' ways of knowing are distinct. They record, assess, reconstruct and interpret in a way that others scholars do not. Historians continually reinterpret the events of the past and reappraise them for each new generation. ...read more.

Conclusion

And to the extent that history is (necessarily) subjective, i.e. a matter of the position from which it is written, historical accounts or explanations are liable to the problem of bias, i.e. partiality, tendentiousness or even prejudice. The historian cannot be objective about the period, which is his subject. In this he differs (to his intellectual advantage) from its most typical ideologists, who believed that the progress of technology, 'positive science' and society made it possible to view their present with the unanswerable impartiality of the natural scientist, whose methods they believed themselves (mistakenly) to understand. For much of the time that history has been written, the work of the historian was not thought to be particularly problematic -- as long as he had the right intentions, he would just try to discover the truth, and ''tell how it really was.'' The first law for the historian is that he shall never dare utter an untruth. The second is that he shall suppress nothing that is true. Moreover, there shall be no suspicion of partiality in his writing, or of malice. History, then, is not, as it has so often been misdescribed, a story of successive events or an account of change. Unlike the natural scientist, the historian is not concerned with events as such at all. He is only concerned with those events, which are the outward expression of thoughts. ... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent can historians be objective?

    Impossible, but supposing such a map was drawn, it would be pointless and unusable. Maps are designed for a specific aim, and such a map could not serve any practical purpose. Instead, 'different maps are constructed, depending on the aim of the mapmaker.'

  2. Thucydides' historical technique.

    Could it not be said that he may have concentrated on including certain dramatic parts of speeches, or other issues, which he considered interesting, thus neglecting other issues, and possibly changing the emphasis of the speech? Again we have to look at (i.

  1. Free essay

    History Assessment

    He is most remembered for this speech. His speech was about his desire for a future where blacks and whites would exist pleasantly as equals. During Martin Luther's time many individual blacks were very courageous and usually stood in groups rebelling against the racist laws.

  2. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    They may have been susceptible to bribes and they could have gone in with a particular mindset and written something false. We simply do not know. On the other hand, however, this source is useful as it provides an insight into children's working conditions in Birmingham.

  1. How Important is the Knowledge of a Works Historical content in Understanding it?

    By the end of the chapter the two authors have discussed both sides to the argument in detail and then, basically, leaves it to the reader to make their own conclusion. Rushdie, Salman, Shame, 1985 I found this book through an essay written by Christine Brooke-Rose, it is not written

  2. The purpose of Stanton Drew Stone Circles

    John Wood Description of Bath 1749 This source is another source that can be disregarded immediately as we have counted the stones ourselves and not been struck down. This was probably promoted due to a fear of the stones so that people would stay away from them and consider them evil.

  1. Cats in Ancient Egypt

    her kittens from whatever peril faced them; whether that be a fire she would leap through to rescue them or a battle with another predator that she would fight till death to protect her kittens. Bastet is often referred to with the phrase "Housewife Bastet" adding to the symbol of feminism.

  2. Describe law and order in the late nineteenth century

    Eventhough, this could of easily been resisted by making sure that at each point of where obvious crimes were going to be commited, two or three policemen could of been patrolling that particular place/area. This imparticular could of led to the culprit who was responsible for killing prostitutes, Jack the ripper.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work