• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Theory of knowledge

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory of knowledge: Altansunar Onur What are the methods of the historians and how do they compare with other methodologies: First of all, we have to know what is the definition of history: It is a branch of knowledge dealing with past events, political, social, economic, of a country, continent, or the world. It is an orderly description of past events. It is also a train of events connected with a person or thing. Secondly I will define what is a method. It is 1) a system, orderliness, 2) it is a way of doing something 3) doing things with 4) it is a science or study of something. The differences between the facts of the past and historical facts: We all know, or think we know, what a fact is: a reliable piece of information, something we know to be, in the common sense meaning of the word "true". We also know, or think we know, what an historical fact is. Give examples. These are facts, definite pieces of historical knowledge, close perhaps to the natural scientific knowledge the nineteenth century historians wanted to use as their model of knowledge. But these facts are only the start of history, only the foundation on which history is built. ...read more.

Middle

They are archivists and curators, collectors and preservers. E.G: Nothing is moved until photographs are taken, measurements made and meticulous records compiled of everything that is there and exactly where it is. That is the work of the historical researchers who record and preserve evidence from the past. Every objects is recorded and, as far as possible identified. The historical knowledge these Historians have is no different from the knowledge of natural science: it is empirical and of course objective. Give example of the titanic. 2) Assessment: These historians asses the evidence they have, compare it to other similar evidences that might be available and come to the conclusion that Holden's room are indeed a unique historical event. 3) Reconstructing the past: Having assessed the evidence and accepted its importance, historians now have to use it, to infer from it and to reconstruct the past. They use evidences. Historians also are interested in reconstructing beyond the obvious. They attempt to reconstruct the values of a wealthy youth 100 years ago. 4) Interpreting: Historians ask themselves questions. They might compare the artefacts with other atifacts for instance... Historians' ways of knowing are distinct. They record, assess, reconstruct and interpret in a way that others scholars do not. Historians continually reinterpret the events of the past and reappraise them for each new generation. ...read more.

Conclusion

And to the extent that history is (necessarily) subjective, i.e. a matter of the position from which it is written, historical accounts or explanations are liable to the problem of bias, i.e. partiality, tendentiousness or even prejudice. The historian cannot be objective about the period, which is his subject. In this he differs (to his intellectual advantage) from its most typical ideologists, who believed that the progress of technology, 'positive science' and society made it possible to view their present with the unanswerable impartiality of the natural scientist, whose methods they believed themselves (mistakenly) to understand. For much of the time that history has been written, the work of the historian was not thought to be particularly problematic -- as long as he had the right intentions, he would just try to discover the truth, and ''tell how it really was.'' The first law for the historian is that he shall never dare utter an untruth. The second is that he shall suppress nothing that is true. Moreover, there shall be no suspicion of partiality in his writing, or of malice. History, then, is not, as it has so often been misdescribed, a story of successive events or an account of change. Unlike the natural scientist, the historian is not concerned with events as such at all. He is only concerned with those events, which are the outward expression of thoughts. ... ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent can historians be objective?

    Bad academic practise can occur this way, if the writer only selects that data which reinforces existing views. This selection can be further altered by their personal political, moral or even religious stance. To Zinn, the writer of history cannot help but to be subjective.

  2. Thucydides' historical technique.

    Could it not be said that he may have concentrated on including certain dramatic parts of speeches, or other issues, which he considered interesting, thus neglecting other issues, and possibly changing the emphasis of the speech? Again we have to look at (i.

  1. Was Oystermouth Castle typical of the castles built in Wales during the middle Ages?

    This then meant that Oystermouth was able to focus on more domestic features as its way of keeping up with society, as it no longer needed the military features that other castles did. Oystermouth later became abandoned in the 15th century and wasn't rebuilt after attack, as it wasn't needed for a domestic or military use.

  2. Describe law and order in the late nineteenth century

    Despite all the improvements made within the police force, the police were hit very hard with a number of serious incidents due to their reputation. Beforehand in 1868, there had only been a few major incidents, but by the mid 1880s the whole scenary changed.

  1. Using the sources and my own knowledge explain if I agree with this assessment ...

    Even the windows were six feet from the floor, and a further 'refinement' was to have the windowsills sloping downwards, preventing them from being used as seats of shelves. I furthermore saw the gates, which were not evident in the source.

  2. "Without a knowledge of the past, we would have no knowledge at all." Evaluate ...

    This gives mathematics an uncertainty to its complex level where people cease to understand its use in the community. Similarly with history, people may argue that it does not have a use at the present day, "Happy is the country that has no history", 16th Century English proverb.

  1. The purpose of Stanton Drew Stone Circles

    Here are the theories as to their purpose and also an evaluation of each source saying whether it is valid, as well as whether these sources could have been an actual purpose of the stones. Source 1 "This noble monument is vulgarly called the Weddings; and they say, tis a company that assisted at a nuptial solemnity thus petrify'd.

  2. From the evidence available, trace the development of the Jewellery Quarter in the ...

    Also, the gas-jets were supplied on credit. This shows that it was easy to not only set up in the toy trade, but also as a master jeweller (See Source 5 - And 18th Century jeweller at his bench). Master jewellers often recruited apprentices to work with them in the Jewellery Quarter.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work