• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem for the last fifty years. Do these sources allow you to come to a firm conclusion about who or what is responsible for this problem?

Extracts from this document...


There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem for the last fifty years. Do these sources allow you to come to a firm conclusion about who or what is responsible for this problem? Since the formation of the state of Israel, Palestinians have left their homes and villages in order to escape, what they believe is, a corrupt and illegal Government. The Palestinian refugee problem has come in waves, with Arabs initially leaving after the Deir Yassin massacre, and then more leaving after the Six Day War in 1967. This was because as Israel extended its borders Arabs, who had previously been living in the South of Syria or Sinai, did not want to live under Jewish command and so fled the country. This means that a lot of people have been born and grown up in refugee camps and also hate the Jews, even though they were not directly involved in the original crisis. As the Palestinian refugee population has grown, so has its power and military strength. Many refugees are now recruited into guerrilla groups and attack Israel in various ways as they want the wider world to remember their fight for their homeland. At the 1978 peace talks at Camp David, Israeli and Egyptian Presidents agreed that Israel would withdraw from Sinai. ...read more.


This is probably a primary source, though we have no proof as a date is not given. It is likely to be biased towards the Arab point of view, though it does stay relatively neutral by admitting the UN tried to help them. This would make it quite reliable. The source has use as it allows historians to see another view of why the Palestinians stayed as refugees. This reason is that the majority of them refused to go into houses provided for them, thereby making them refugees by their own choice. The source was created from an interview with refugees so it is unlikely to have a hidden agenda, though it may do as the comments are made by Palestinians. Source E is a primary source and is a record of a speech given to the UN by the Israeli ambassador, Abba Eban, in 1958. Mr Eban says that the Arabs are only refugees because other Arab countries had had an economy boom and did not want to share their wealth with the refugees. He finishes by saying that although there is room in the Arab world for the refugees no one wants them, not because there is not room. This source is biased from an Israeli point of view as it is a primary source, meaning that the situation has only just begun. ...read more.


In conclusion, although a variety of sources have been presented for evaluation, it is hard to make a clear decision on who is to blame for the crisis. The only sources that can be considered are sources C and G, as biased sources cannot be used in making a fair judgement. However, the fact that source G does not reach a conclusion means it cannot be used. Therefore, only source C can be used to answer the question. This means a firm conclusion cannot be made as information from more than one source is needed. Although the Jews could be blamed, as they forced the Arabs out of their homeland, so too could the Palestinians who refused to settle in other lands or other Arab countries who may have refused them houses. Another problem on deciding who to blame for the crisis is the amount of bias in the sources. As the conflict has been going on for so long, the majority of the sources cannot be fully believed as the writers will have had interest and feelings about the conflict. As the crisis continues even to this day, it is likely that a mixture of causes (both long and short term) made the Palestinians evacuate their homeland, and so no one factor can be completely blamed for it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Decolonization of India - analysing the sources.

    discuss' that India has faced many political issues. Source E details that, "most burning issues were the riots between Hindus and Muslims." Before Independence, India was governed by a foreign body and did as it was told and there was some sort of stability, peace and balance amongst Hindu's and Muslims but since Independence, the variant communities are with dfferent identities have been demanding rights for their community.

  2. How Far Was Gorbachev Responsible For The End Of Soviet Union?

    These examples show Gorbachev inadvertently boosting nationalism. However it would be too simplistic to say that nationalism was entirely Gorbachev's fault. Historians suggest that nationalism was only "muzzled and kennelled" (R+FotSE P121) and not subdued permanently. The Baltic republics were "long dismayed" (R+FotSE P122)

  1. The Cuban Missile Crisis: Was President Kennedy the Saviour of the Cuban Missile Crisis?

    All of this lead to the likely hood of a possibly peaceful world. Kennedy was seen as a saviour of the world because by preventing missiles from permanently being installed on Cuba he had avoided nuclear war. He had hidden the weaknesses that Khrushchev thought he possesed e.g.

  2. Cuban Missile Crisis Sources Questions

    The historian, therefore, takes a risk in giving his fairest possible perspective of the crisis. Following on from this, Source J talks of the end of the Cuban Missile Crisis as a victory of Soviet foreign policy, and that there was an agreement or settlement that there would be no

  1. Suez crisis 03 coarsework source evaluation

    He is trying to threaten an Egyptian sailor . Eden says, "If you don't give it back, I'll shoot, "this statement does not distinguish who he will shoot but the picture shows that he will shoot himself. This is expressing the point that Eden has no control of the situation and that he cannot do anything about it.

  2. Arab Israeli Conflict

    After the wars, because of the Israelis determination to gain back the land which they feel is the homeland for Jewish people, the control over the Palestinians is continuing: There is constant vandalism of Palestinian cultural buildings, homes and offices.

  1. Question 2. Explain why the rest of the World is so interested in the ...

    Said Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader. Jihad has been quite significant in the Arab-Israeli conflict as the Muslims wasn't to protect what is rightfully theirs. The literal meaning of Jihad is struggle or effort, and it means much more than holy war.

  2. Cold War Summary, quotes and revision notes.

    - Israelis gained the upper hand - USSR threatened to intervene - US put its forces on ralert - both supported a ceasefire (Feature of early stages of d�tente that such crises could not disrupt the improved relations.) Strategies and Policies * 1972 Nixon and Brezhnev signed SALT 1 -

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work