• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There was no general war (i.e. one involving all the great powers at the same time) in Europe between 1815 and 1914. Why?

Extracts from this document...


There was no general war (i.e. one involving all the great powers at the same time) in Europe between 1815 and 1914. Why? For the hundred years from 1815 to 1914, Europe was, for the most part, peaceful. This is in marked contrast to the years immediately preceding, and after this period, when all the major states in Europe were embroiled in long, widespread conflict against each other. There are many possible reasons for this protracted period of peace, and indeed how the stability broke and World War One began. The Vienna Settlement, that followed the end of the Napoleonic Wars is generally regarded as one of the most important factors in maintaining peace, but there were quite a few other factors, maybe less significant on there own, but when pieced together all helped to ensure a century of relative peace throughout Europe. These factors included the continuity of leadership throughout the century, the overseas and imperial aims of the European countries and the balance of power that was sustained throughout. The Congress of Vienna was an attempt to ensure that one country, in this case France, could never again wage war on Europe as she has done until her defeat in 1815. After having waged war on a massive scale against Britain, Spain, Russia, Austria, and the Prussians, France was defeated by the victorious powers. ...read more.


The domestic focus of Germany was squarely on unification, and this ensured that Prussia did not look too far beyond her own borders, with the notable exception of the conquest of Alsace and Lorraine from the French in 1871-2. This dispute was a localized affair, and never seriously threatened the international order. The same can be said of the small military entanglements between a number of the states from 1854-70. These wars were short and decisive, ending in defeats for Austria and France.7 Again, the defeated countries maintained their great power status, ensuring a continuing status quo. The stability of France, whose monarchy was restored in 1815, was also significant8 The rulers and leaders of the great powers were also in close contact at this time, and many were indeed related. There were family ties between the monarchies of Russia, Britain and the unified Germany. These rulers regarded the treaties that were signed in this period, as personal, and binding, and it was a matter of personal honour to ensure they were upheld. This "autocratic alliance" served to ensure stability amongst the powers.9 The Nineteenth Century saw many of the European powers look overseas to expand their empires. Africa, the Near and Far East, and parts of Asia were colonised by explorers and missionaries from Britain, France, Germany, and even the smaller nations like Holland and Belgium. ...read more.


It did not unduly punish France, leaving it to seek constant revision, like Germany post Versailles. The success of the Congress of Vienna and the diplomatic situation it provided was surely the most influential factor in giving Europe one hundred years of relative peace. That it not to say however that the other factor did not play apart. Their piece in the jigsaw of the causes of WW1 serve to show us just how important they were in previously maintaining the peace. We have seen that when the other factors started to cause tension, such as overseas expansion, trade, and the failure of one of the major power, the Ottoman Empire, the Vienna settlement was not sufficient on its own to prevent the outbreak of another general European War. I would suggest the other factors served to support the results of the Congress of Vienna, and unfortunately, as we have seen with Versailles, without support, failure is virtually guaranteed. Footnotes 1. Bullen, Roger The Great Powers and the European States System 1815-1914 (Longman, London and New York, 1980), p.2 2. Sked, Alan Europe's Balance of Power 1815-1848 (Macmillan, Basingstoke 1978), p.27 3. Ibid, p.30 4. Ibid, p.32 5. Bullen, Great Powers p.2 6. Sked, Balance of Power p.30 7. Bullen, Great Powers p.8 8. Sked, Balance of Power p.30 9. Bullen, Great Powers p.12 10. Gilbert, Martin History of the Twentieth Century (Harper Collins, London, 2001), p.71 11. Bullen, Great Powers p. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Long Fuse by Laurence Lafore - Chapter Three: The Europe of the Armed ...

    But the complexities of it prevented it from being revised. Germany was a federal empire and each of the states had its own ruling system and theoretically, the federal government had little power. However, one state had more power than all of the others.

  2. The Road to War: Europe, 1870-1914

    Bismarck then attempted to revive the Three Emperors' League, which would open the way up to better relations between Vienna and St. Petersburg and continue to keep France isolated. He was able to accomplish this and the Three Emperors' Alliance was signed on 18 June 1881 with Germany, Austria- Hungary and Russia.

  1. In what ways did the balance of power change in Europe between 1870 and ...

    Frances power in Europe was also decreasing, with the economy and military force doing badly and then the Franco-Prussian war defeat in 1871. Although similarly to Britain it also had a huge overseas empire in Africa and the Far East.

  2. The Vienna Settlement

    This treaty was moderate to France since she did not receive any harsh punishment. She was not disarmed, nor was she called upon to pay a war indemnity. Moreover, she was not even asked to return the masterpieces of art to Italy and Germany.

  1. "William II's foreign policy contributed greatly to tensions in Europebetween 1890 and 1914." Discuss.

    only politically and on the issue of colonies), which will become more and more distinct with time and William II's further intrusions. For this, Europe did not have to wait long. In 1911, when the French occupied Fez, the capital of Morocco, the Kaiser sent a gunboat to its coast

  2. "Tension between the countries of Europe increased in year before 1914 due to the ...

    Germany agreed to Austria against Russia if Austria would help Germany against France so that emphasizes that there was tension between countries. The countries themselves worked together to avoid war, Bismarck for Germany tries lots of ways to create peace between countries like in the reinsurance Treaty with Austria.

  1. Why did World War I start in 1914 and not earlier?

    Furthermore, WWI almost break out in 1912 when the German General Staff pushed Wilhem II. to start a war in order to prevent the case of "Einkreisung", as all the signs were pointing for this. However, Wilhem II. refused to this proposal, as he probably waited for an obvious reason

  2. What where the causes of WW1

    The First Balkan War broke out on 8 October 1912 when Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro and Serbia having large parts of their ethnic populations under Ottoman sovereignty, attacked the Ottoman Empire, terminating its five-century rule in the Balkans in a seven-month campaign resulting in the Treaty of London.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work