• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There was widespread support for the Tsar before 1914"

Extracts from this document...


Amy Wong Form: 10.1 "There was widespread support for the Tsar before 1914" There is plenty of evidence to suggest that there wasn't a widespread support for the Tsar before 1914. I think the statement is false because nearly all of the sources and information that I have encountered are unsupportive towards the Tsar. The reasons for this include the fact that Tsar Nicholas was out of touch, he didn't listen to his people, he relied on the army a great deal and he left living and working conditions poor for the unwealthy population of the country. From source B, we can see that the Tsar was out of touch and unsympathetic towards the public demands. We can see this because whenever a problem would arise from the people of Russia, Tsar Nicholas would ignore them and he simply would not care. Source B shows the number of factory strikes and strikers in Russia 1905-14 and it shows a huge number of strikers throughout the years in which Tsar Nicholas ruled. ...read more.


Another reason why there was not a widespread support for the Tsar is because he relied on the Army to carry out orders a great deal. Whenever there was a problem, he sent out the army to kill people or damage their properties. This of course was not the correct way to deal with the situation. A great example of this is the event of 'Bloody Sunday'. Five hundred marchers were killed and thousands more were wounded when they went to show Tsar Nicholas a petition about living and working conditions. This convinced many people that the Tsars were appalling leaders and more people wanted to start a revolution as said in source E. Source E also shows that even the Duma was not happy with the Tsar and his government. The leader of the Octobrists, who was supposed to support the Tsar, wrote the source; but they were angry because the Tsar was not giving them enough power. ...read more.


Most people were probably just celebrating the fact that they had a day off, not because it was supposed to be celebrating the Tsars. Following on from that is source F, which is a photograph showing townspeople and peasants supposedly waiting to see the Tsar in Kostroma in 1913. Although that is stated, the people in the photo could actually have been taken at another event, celebrating or waiting for something else. There is not much evidence prove it is a photograph is of people waiting to see the Tsar. In conclusion to all of this, it can be argued that there was and wasn't a widespread support for the Tsar. Although most of the sources showed a negative support for the Tsar, for example in sources A, B C and E, a couple of the sources did show some support; that in sources D and F, and as the majority of the sources were indeed against the Tsars, I choose to believe that there wasn't a widespread support for the Tsars, only a small population of Russia did support the Tsars before 1914. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Khrushchev says that 'this should be done in the interests of the party and of the working masses'. This was true because although Stalin purged between 8-14 million people during his reign of power. Many great achievements were created. Production of steel, iron, electricity and coal rose by vast amounts.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Stalin had blundered this time as by the time the war came about there was nobody left to guide the army. Due to his acute paranoia, Stalin suspected that others were plotting behind his back, so he either killed them or he would pack them off to labour camps in

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    a train whereas Source C, contrastingly, explains, "a lorry carried the corpses to the Four Brothers mine" where the bodies were destroyed "with the aid of petrol and hydrochloric acid". Finally, the other major similarity between Sources A and B and C is the unreliability of these sources as all

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    trying to brainwash people to hate Stalin and to try and show them that he is the 'good guy', as in the time of the speech it is he who is in power, and therefore would want people to approve of him.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    This was shown in source B by the 'girls in nurses' dresses hurrying to duty' and the 'women in mourning', with 'bands of wounded soldiers being taken around round the town'. From the 13 million soldiers mobilised for the Russian side in the First World War, 9.15 million of them became casualties.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    There are many similarities between the class war and war between nations. In the latter too, only a very small proportion of the population are in the armed forces. And only a small minority of the army is at the front.

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    This shows that some parts of the book and his finding might not have been true. On the other hand, it could mean that someone might not have wanted people to find out the truth behind his findings. The source was produced some years later after the murder.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    This means that it is less likely that the information is incorrect, however there is still a large possibility that it is biased, as the British government held similar views on communism to the American government. The fact that the two sources are written in the same year (1918)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work