• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There was widespread support for the Tsar before 1914"

Extracts from this document...


Amy Wong Form: 10.1 "There was widespread support for the Tsar before 1914" There is plenty of evidence to suggest that there wasn't a widespread support for the Tsar before 1914. I think the statement is false because nearly all of the sources and information that I have encountered are unsupportive towards the Tsar. The reasons for this include the fact that Tsar Nicholas was out of touch, he didn't listen to his people, he relied on the army a great deal and he left living and working conditions poor for the unwealthy population of the country. From source B, we can see that the Tsar was out of touch and unsympathetic towards the public demands. We can see this because whenever a problem would arise from the people of Russia, Tsar Nicholas would ignore them and he simply would not care. Source B shows the number of factory strikes and strikers in Russia 1905-14 and it shows a huge number of strikers throughout the years in which Tsar Nicholas ruled. ...read more.


Another reason why there was not a widespread support for the Tsar is because he relied on the Army to carry out orders a great deal. Whenever there was a problem, he sent out the army to kill people or damage their properties. This of course was not the correct way to deal with the situation. A great example of this is the event of 'Bloody Sunday'. Five hundred marchers were killed and thousands more were wounded when they went to show Tsar Nicholas a petition about living and working conditions. This convinced many people that the Tsars were appalling leaders and more people wanted to start a revolution as said in source E. Source E also shows that even the Duma was not happy with the Tsar and his government. The leader of the Octobrists, who was supposed to support the Tsar, wrote the source; but they were angry because the Tsar was not giving them enough power. ...read more.


Most people were probably just celebrating the fact that they had a day off, not because it was supposed to be celebrating the Tsars. Following on from that is source F, which is a photograph showing townspeople and peasants supposedly waiting to see the Tsar in Kostroma in 1913. Although that is stated, the people in the photo could actually have been taken at another event, celebrating or waiting for something else. There is not much evidence prove it is a photograph is of people waiting to see the Tsar. In conclusion to all of this, it can be argued that there was and wasn't a widespread support for the Tsar. Although most of the sources showed a negative support for the Tsar, for example in sources A, B C and E, a couple of the sources did show some support; that in sources D and F, and as the majority of the sources were indeed against the Tsars, I choose to believe that there wasn't a widespread support for the Tsars, only a small population of Russia did support the Tsars before 1914. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    In order to try to come to a conclusion we have to analyse the facts what made him was he was. Stalin was an un-compassionate, paranoid mass killer but on the other hand he was able to raise Russia to superpower status and overcome depression in a very short space of time.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    At the same time there was a reinterpretation of Mao's work, with new editions of his pre-1960's work being published. Mao's pre-Cultural Revolution published work was far more pragmatic, and much more in line with the Deng approach. With the official trial of the Gang of Four, Hua was to

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    The details were disclosed much later through official American reports. On the 1st March 1919, a mutiny occurred among French troops ordered to go up to the line; several days earlier a British infantry company 'refused to go to the front,' and shortly afterwards an American company 'refused for a time to return to duty at the front'."

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    We can always make another man'. This could be to blame them for the problems of Russia and make them scapegoats. Stalin might also want to use this source to say to the Capitalist nations of the world that any stories that they may have heard about Russia were not his fault, but the people beneath him.

  1. What can you learn from Source A about the reactions in Russiato the outbreak ...

    Because of the tremendous loss of soldiers and battles in the first few months the Tsar took personal control of the armed forces. From then on he was held personally responsible for the defeats and blunders of the army and through this he lost the support and trust of the people.

  2. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Khrushchev became the leader of Russia after Stalin's death, and therefore it is not surprising he spoke out about Stalin. Sources G and H are examples of this After reading the two sources G and H, we see some contradiction in Khrushchev's assessment of Stalin and different points being

  1. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    Medvedev was a Bolshevik. It tells you a lot more detail about what happened when the Romanov family were killed. This source is reliable because he was there when the shots were fired, however it could be unreliable because he was outside when the actual shots were fired.

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? Sourcework

    also Sergeyev's account, says 'The Empress, the Tsar's son, and the four other children were not shot in that house.' This shows that somewhere along the line, Sergeyev has contradicted himself. The final sentence of source B says, 'a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work