• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

These two sources are not about Haig and The Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree that they have no use for a historian studying Haig and The Battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question 2c Study sources D and E. These two sources are not about Haig and The Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree that they have no use for a historian studying Haig and The Battle of the Somme? Sources D and E are both picture sources, D is a still from Blackadder goes forth a TV series from the 1980's. It shows two officers, Blackadder and George Percy, discussing an imminent attack on the Germans. Source E is a cartoon from after the battle of the Somme and before Paschendaele, Punch, February 1917. Both Sources are relevant to Haig and The Battle of the Somme. ...read more.

Middle

This would be useful to a historian because it shows that Haig was not around for his men. Source E also supports this, 'Major-General: (addressing the men before practising an attack behind the lines). "I want you to understand the difference between the rehearsal and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first the absence of the enemy. Now (turning to the regimental Sergeant-Major) what is the second difference?". Sergeant-Major: "the absence of the General, Sir."' This is intended to be quite comical. This source never actually says that the person they are talking about is Haig but if you look at the picture they are addressing a man who looks like the spitting image of Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

On 8th August 1914, the House of Commons passed the Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) without debate. During the war publishing information that was calculated to be indirectly or directly of use to the enemy became an offence and accordingly punishable in a court of law. This included any description of war and any news that was likely to cause any conflict between the public and military authorities. Source E was an exception to this as there was no mention of Haig and could have been just a cartoon that was not related to the war. In conclusion I believe both sources are reliable and better yet they support each other. A historian would be able to use this sources knowing they would be reliable. ?? ?? ?? ?? Rose Worrall ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    The Germans were terrified. The ground gained on that day was more than on any other. The tanks were very unreliable and failed to cause a breakthrough. The opportunity for the surprise use of tanks was over and some historians saw this as an opportunity squandered and criticise Haig for bad judgement.

  2. The Battle of the Somme - source related study

    Soldiers could possibly get caught on the barbed wire, in which was placed nearly everywhere in no mans land. In the source, it said "My clothes were torn to ribbons by barbed wire." So, if it were that easy to rip your clothes, it would be very simple to tear a leg.

  1. The Somme - source related study.

    The bombardment will stop tomorrow and you will attack." Source D "A German solider describing what happened when the bombardment of the German lines stopped." Both extracts describe the bombardment stopping, however we know that the bombardment didn't stop, it just lifted to the German reserve lines.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: "The butcher of the Somme?" - source related study.

    I believe that the book finds someone who has made a few mistakes in some peoples eyes and then magnified the problem to such an extent that they can then print it in a book. They would have just picked out the bad points against Haig; I don't think it

  1. Haig and 'The Battle of the Somme' - source related study.

    Therefore I believe Haig must have been misinformed, as the British front would have been around 15 miles long and as the telephone line had been cut, the limited communications would have caused Haig to miss out on and have very limited information.

  2. Why is the Battle of the Somme regarded as such a great military tragedy?

    It was only an element in slackening up a German offensive which had already slowed down and was now a practical and almost an acknowledged failure.'

  1. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    Yet, it was the unfortunate action of one German pilot that altered the whole pattern of the war, but saved the RAF. Hitler's ego got in the way and changed Germany's tactics just when they had the British were they wanted them.

  2. The Battle of the Somme

    The Generals, in particular Haig, were confident with their plans and said not 'even a rat' would be alive in the German trenches. It was decided that after the bombardment, the infantry would walk over No Man's Land. Haig thought there would be no need to run as the trenches would be empty.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work