• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

These two sources are not about Haig and The Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree that they have no use for a historian studying Haig and The Battle of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework Question 2c Study sources D and E. These two sources are not about Haig and The Battle of the Somme. How far do you agree that they have no use for a historian studying Haig and The Battle of the Somme? Sources D and E are both picture sources, D is a still from Blackadder goes forth a TV series from the 1980's. It shows two officers, Blackadder and George Percy, discussing an imminent attack on the Germans. Source E is a cartoon from after the battle of the Somme and before Paschendaele, Punch, February 1917. Both Sources are relevant to Haig and The Battle of the Somme. ...read more.

Middle

This would be useful to a historian because it shows that Haig was not around for his men. Source E also supports this, 'Major-General: (addressing the men before practising an attack behind the lines). "I want you to understand the difference between the rehearsal and the real thing. There are three essential differences: first the absence of the enemy. Now (turning to the regimental Sergeant-Major) what is the second difference?". Sergeant-Major: "the absence of the General, Sir."' This is intended to be quite comical. This source never actually says that the person they are talking about is Haig but if you look at the picture they are addressing a man who looks like the spitting image of Haig. ...read more.

Conclusion

On 8th August 1914, the House of Commons passed the Defence of the Realm Act (DORA) without debate. During the war publishing information that was calculated to be indirectly or directly of use to the enemy became an offence and accordingly punishable in a court of law. This included any description of war and any news that was likely to cause any conflict between the public and military authorities. Source E was an exception to this as there was no mention of Haig and could have been just a cartoon that was not related to the war. In conclusion I believe both sources are reliable and better yet they support each other. A historian would be able to use this sources knowing they would be reliable. ?? ?? ?? ?? Rose Worrall ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Case study: The Battle of the Somme.

    The Germans were terrified. The ground gained on that day was more than on any other. The tanks were very unreliable and failed to cause a breakthrough. The opportunity for the surprise use of tanks was over and some historians saw this as an opportunity squandered and criticise Haig for bad judgement.

  2. Dunkirk and The Battle of Britain - Why was Britain able to win the ...

    However, I feel the source may be exaggerated for propaganda purposes to show the scenes as a miracle, which Churchill used as a morale booster. Because of these points, I consider the events depicted in this scene are true but slightly overstated.

  1. Study Sources D and E. These two sources are not about Haig and the ...

    This lets us know that the generals are really in touch with the soldiers on the front line and probably wouldn't know what the conditions are there.

  2. General Haig and the battle of the somme

    there living the moment and not from some digitally retouched or staged scenes in source I because in that source half of the pictures are staged 5 miles behind the front lines. We know this because the trenches seen in the picture on source I are not deep enough to

  1. Haig in sources

    The first is from "The war in outline" by Basil Liddell that was published in the 1920's. "British and French losses 614,000 : German losses 440,000", to me this suggests that the author of this book was a German, because if Germany had lost less men than both British and

  2. Dunkirk and the battle of Britain.

    The quote I have mentioned is quite scary and shown total domination from the axis forces. I think this was written for the people back home or as a memoir for a diary. If this account is true, it shows Dunkirk as a success as the Germans seem to be out of control seem to be in control.

  1. Styal Mill - Study sources A, B, C and D. Which of these sources ...

    protected, because it as the machinery that tore his finger off which lead him to run away to see his mum. The fact that he ran away to see his mum may have meant he wasn't cared for properly and wanted his mum to look after him.

  2. These two sources are not bout Haig and the battle of the Somme. How ...

    It says that generals were never present at battles, only during practice. This must include Haig, as he was a general at the time (40 miles away from the front line). Soldiers felt let down by the generals: "absence of general sir".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work