• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to L to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your a

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The war on colour television screens in American living rooms has made Americans far more anti war than anything else. The full brutality of the combat will be there in close-up and in colour and blood looks very red on a colour television screen." (A statement made by a BBC commentator in 1970, to members of the British Armed Forces.) This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to L to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. In the late 1960's colour television became popular and part of most households and most American families had one. This coincided with the Vietnam war and as a result this war became famous for being the first televised war. As channels were very limited with there being only two or three channels, the Vietnam War was one of the only things available to watch on television. This made America more anti war than anything else as television being relatively new was uncensored so the Americans at home saw the Americans at war change tactics and start using more violent methods such as Napalm bombs- a type of flame thrower or fire bomb, and Agent Orange- a deadly chemical cocktail used as a defoliant to kill the rainforests and destroy the Vietcong's hiding places. ...read more.

Middle

This source is a piece of writing by Richard Hamer, an American journalist, writing in 1970. This source is talking about the dilemma faced by the American soldiers. It describes what the soldiers witnessed as it describes walking down the road and there being dead men and people screaming with limbs blown off. At the beginning of the piece it is quite sympathetic as it describes the dilemma faced as the soldiers have to decide whether to kill one peasant or none as they will not be able to find out who threw the mortar. However it is anti war as it says; "one does not use napalm on villages and hamlets sheltering civilians...if one is attempting to persuade these people of the righteousness of one's cause"; which shows that Hamer is against the American soldiers' tactics. The tone he uses is quite patronising and mocking showing that he disagrees and thinks that their tactics are illogical, because they are trying to show that their cause is right by blowing up villages and injuring innocent civilians. I do not think that this would have linked to television helping America lose the Vietnam War as this is a piece of writing, and would have not been seen by millions of people on a screen. Source G is the reactions in 1968 of an American soldier after having just been told about the massacre of 347 unarmed civilians at My Lai. ...read more.

Conclusion

This number was reduced to 39 percent in October 1969, showing that the public were starting to disagree with the war and then in October 1970, 42 percent of Australians wanted the soldiers to carry on. This shows that although in April 1969 the majority of Australians wanted the troops to carry on fighting by October not a lot of people wanted the war to carry on and although a year later more people wanted the war to carry on half the population still wanted it to end. This shows that television had an impact on the public's opinion because they wouldn't have been able to form a decision, if they hadn't of viewed the war on television. In conclusion, although television wasn't a huge issue in the sources, as the majority of them were for none televised Medias, it played an important part in helping America lose the Vietnam War. This is because millions of people saw the true horrors of the war, such as the napalm attacks. This would have lead to massive outrage about the Vietnam War in many countries. The fact television was widely uncensored, would not have helped as Americans would have seen more bloodshed, then in the modern current day. Therefore television was very important, but so were none televised Medias, as they helped weight America's anti war attitude by being accessed by the few people who did not own a television. Holly-Maria Crompton http://www.library.kent.edu/page/11247 http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/vietnam/ustactics.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Hamer continues on to explain that it is not possible to truly determine if one of the peasants - who could quite easily be a Vietcong partisan - lobbed the mortar and, if so, how difficult it is to determine which peasant was responsible and act accordingly.

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    America gradually entered the war to limit the flow of supplies from the soviets, to the Vietnamese yet again another reason America became involved in Vietnam. The speech gives many reasons as to why the US felt they were doing right going into Vietnam.

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The American people back home would have seen this image and thus they would have seen the innocent children, who had nothing to do with the war, suffering due to napalm attacks. This lead to shock and the reality of war struck people all over the world.

  2. Free essay

    Did The United States Lose On The Vietnam War Home front Or Battlefield?

    fight in was so full of plants and growth, that guns and such did not work as well as tactics adapted to the environment such as booby traps and punji sticks. Vietnamese knew that hand to hand combat was the only way to successfully way to win the war as

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    to happen and Bilton may be building a case against one of these. Bilton may have been biased, as he was writing about an atrocity, when he interviewed soldiers he may have felt they were victims. I think Bilton chose to mention the low IQ scores, the short tour of

  2. Why did America lose the Vietnam War?

    that the lack of public spending in America was a more significant reason for the anti-war movement, rather than the impact of television. Source J is a photograph of an anti-war demonstration at Kent State University in 1970. I am aware that the protest was broken up by the National Guard, and four students were killed.

  1. using the sources available, why did America loose to Vietnam?

    The reason they are doing this is because they are some of the many napalm victims. Napalm was a jelly like substance which combined petrol and sticking agents so when it touched something it kept on burning and there was little you could do to get it off.

  2. Why did America lose the War in Vietnam?

    in the grounds of the American embassy which created a ?credibility gap? between the official message and what was seen happening on television. Famously Walter Cronkite, the most influential US anchorman said ?What the hell is going on?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work