• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to L to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your a

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The war on colour television screens in American living rooms has made Americans far more anti war than anything else. The full brutality of the combat will be there in close-up and in colour and blood looks very red on a colour television screen." (A statement made by a BBC commentator in 1970, to members of the British Armed Forces.) This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost the war in Vietnam. Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to L to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. In the late 1960's colour television became popular and part of most households and most American families had one. This coincided with the Vietnam war and as a result this war became famous for being the first televised war. As channels were very limited with there being only two or three channels, the Vietnam War was one of the only things available to watch on television. This made America more anti war than anything else as television being relatively new was uncensored so the Americans at home saw the Americans at war change tactics and start using more violent methods such as Napalm bombs- a type of flame thrower or fire bomb, and Agent Orange- a deadly chemical cocktail used as a defoliant to kill the rainforests and destroy the Vietcong's hiding places. ...read more.

Middle

This source is a piece of writing by Richard Hamer, an American journalist, writing in 1970. This source is talking about the dilemma faced by the American soldiers. It describes what the soldiers witnessed as it describes walking down the road and there being dead men and people screaming with limbs blown off. At the beginning of the piece it is quite sympathetic as it describes the dilemma faced as the soldiers have to decide whether to kill one peasant or none as they will not be able to find out who threw the mortar. However it is anti war as it says; "one does not use napalm on villages and hamlets sheltering civilians...if one is attempting to persuade these people of the righteousness of one's cause"; which shows that Hamer is against the American soldiers' tactics. The tone he uses is quite patronising and mocking showing that he disagrees and thinks that their tactics are illogical, because they are trying to show that their cause is right by blowing up villages and injuring innocent civilians. I do not think that this would have linked to television helping America lose the Vietnam War as this is a piece of writing, and would have not been seen by millions of people on a screen. Source G is the reactions in 1968 of an American soldier after having just been told about the massacre of 347 unarmed civilians at My Lai. ...read more.

Conclusion

This number was reduced to 39 percent in October 1969, showing that the public were starting to disagree with the war and then in October 1970, 42 percent of Australians wanted the soldiers to carry on. This shows that although in April 1969 the majority of Australians wanted the troops to carry on fighting by October not a lot of people wanted the war to carry on and although a year later more people wanted the war to carry on half the population still wanted it to end. This shows that television had an impact on the public's opinion because they wouldn't have been able to form a decision, if they hadn't of viewed the war on television. In conclusion, although television wasn't a huge issue in the sources, as the majority of them were for none televised Medias, it played an important part in helping America lose the Vietnam War. This is because millions of people saw the true horrors of the war, such as the napalm attacks. This would have lead to massive outrage about the Vietnam War in many countries. The fact television was widely uncensored, would not have helped as Americans would have seen more bloodshed, then in the modern current day. Therefore television was very important, but so were none televised Medias, as they helped weight America's anti war attitude by being accessed by the few people who did not own a television. Holly-Maria Crompton http://www.library.kent.edu/page/11247 http://www.learnhistory.org.uk/vietnam/ustactics.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Vietnam.There were many reasons for the USA's loss in the Vietnam War. There is ...

    They all looked alike. They all dressed alike. They were all Vietnamese. Some of them were Vietcong." - Source F. An Extreme example of this is the My Lai Massacre "We were firing before we hit the ground, we fired into the huts all we could.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Hamer continues on to explain that it is not possible to truly determine if one of the peasants - who could quite easily be a Vietcong partisan - lobbed the mortar and, if so, how difficult it is to determine which peasant was responsible and act accordingly.

  1. Why did America lose the Vietnam War?

    This source is unlikely to have been seen in America. However it may be that it reflects the changing opinion of Americans because of the lack of progress of President Johnson's plans for the Great Society. I believe that this source does not support the statement because it could be

  2. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    for this would represent deeper interests, which he would not want to be visible at this point. Any threat to South Vietnam would draw China into the conflict as well, which was what had happened in the Korean War, where a stalemate had occurred and the country split into two, permanently.

  1. Free essay

    Did The United States Lose On The Vietnam War Home front Or Battlefield?

    When the troops hear about people being against them being there- They are obviously going to feel like they are wasting their time, so their morale will be completely devoured. Then with low morale this could make them weaker on the battlefield, giving the North Vietnamese an advantage.

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    are dieing it is partly his fault by using a tactic that encourages manslaughter the tactic was attrition (keep bombing the enemies trenches). Also, source A is a complete contrast from source b because source A doesn't mention any bad points but source B does.

  1. How was the opposition to the Vietnam war protrayed in contemporary literature, film and ...

    Instead the live in fear. This was due to the Vietnam War. The sounds of the bombs terrified the children they weren't able to sleep at night this must have been dreadful. There are also films, which outline the opposition towards the Vietnam War such films as Apocalypse Now.

  2. I think that the four most significant themes in the Vietnam War were protest ...

    have been allowed to retrieve such shocking information then the media reports wouldn?t have been published and appalled a nation. Jack P. Smith, an American veteran, offers one of the most eye-opening accounts of being wounded in combat which was published in the media: "I willed myself to stop shaking, and I stopped breathing...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work