• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Thucydides' historical technique.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Thucydides' Historical Technique. By Philip Beswick Thucydides' historical technique. Thucydides has often been described as one of the fathers of history, and possibly the first historian that can be used with any real historical accuracy. His objectivity and lack of digressive storytelling mark him out from previous historians such as Herodotus, and Thucydides began a new era of historical writing. Although named the father of history, Herodotus wrote in a literary style, rather than the accurate telling of the facts and objective analysis that Thucydides offers us in his History of the Peloponnesian War. Herodotus tended to digress with irrelevant storytelling, whereas Thucydides abandoned this technique, and adopted a method that greatly improved the accuracy of his historical chronicling. Therefore natural questions that arise are: How did Thucydides break new grounds in terms of historical writing? What strengths and indeed weaknesses does Thucydides' writings have? Are they of sufficient accuracy to be useful to modern historians? I will be looking principally at the first two books, although I will make references that will encompass the other 6 books that comprise The History of the Peloponnesian War. First I shall discuss briefly Thucydides' past, as this bears some significant relevance to the way Thucydides was about to write his history, and the expertise he was able to employ. ...read more.

Middle

He does not however use speeches to the extent that Herodotus used them. Herodotus' Histories were mainly in a literary form throughout, and he had decided that he was free to use speeches wherever the narrative allowed it. Thucydides maintains from (I. 21): "I do not think that one will be far wrong in accepting the conclusions which I have reached from the evidence which I have put forward. It is better evidence than that of the poets, who exaggerate the importance of their themes..." Thucydides is far more calculated in the use of his speeches, not wasting time with short speeches on small matters and small debates, which Herodotus used regularly. He mainly uses them on full addresses on large matters4 or encouragement for troops before an important battle5, moments of historical importance, and the sources prove useful in giving us material to analyse as well as some social and political insight into the history. For example, Thucydides gives us a popular view on the inherent weaknesses of oligarchies, with some personal analysis on (viii 89.4.) "Most of those involved in the oligarchy were...discontented with it...They maintained that the five thousand should be appointed so that the government should be set up on a wider basis." ...read more.

Conclusion

As well as having comparisons with tragedy, Thucydides also has similarities with epic, in particular, Homer. There is one passage in particular, which seems to reflect this similarity, (VII. 87. 5-6): 'And this Hellenic event turned out to be the greatest connected with this war and, at least in my opinion, of Hellenic events we have heard of, the most splendid for those who won and the most wretched for those who were ruined. For after having been completely defeated in every respect and suffering no little misery at every point in, as the saying is, total destruction, army and navy, nothing was not lost, and few out of many returned home. This was what happened concerning Sicily.' "...few out of many returned home," is a quote that could have been directly plucked from one of Odysseus' stories to the Phaeacians. Also, the words that Thucydides uses, links his works to the nostos genre of epic. 1 Thucydides is reputed to have owned gold mines here, and would have helped him to fund his evidence collecting missions. "Ancient Thrace was largely uncultivated and covered with dense forest; mineral deposits, particularly of gold, made the region a coveted possession."- Encarta 2002 2 Explained later: Pg2 Line 11. 3 (I 32) The debate between Corcyra and Corinth, which started over ownership of the colony Epidamnus, and took place in Athens. 4 Such as (i. 67-117) 5 Such as (ii. 87-9) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    And then he expected them to go straight into battle when they were not on top form to do so, whereas he should have sat in this situation until the other troops came. " He was too hard on his men and horses.

  2. Explain how the changing reputation of Columbus illuminates the nature of historical study.

    Similarly with the Churchill figure promoting the bulldog spirit of World War Two wouldn't bode well with conscientious objectors of that time who were imprisoned for there beliefs alone. History plays a huge part in shaping a national identity, figures such as Columbus are recognised as heroes or villains depending

  1. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    Thucydides wants to know why events occurred, not just record them. This is perhaps why he invented the premise of a 'Peloponnesian War'. History does not specifically refer to the events accounted by Thucydides as a 'war', but his relation does realise that there is a specific causality behind the events that occurred.

  2. The California Gold Rush.

    Merchant vessels were, for the most part, only minimally converted for passenger comfort (but this was not vital if these ships were sound and well-handled). What was criminal was the way in which get-rich-quick operators dragged rotten-bottomed ships out of retirement, patched the worst of their leaks, and, as often

  1. Objective histories.

    history of mankind was a history of struggles between classes in societies. This is invariably reflected in his works and explanations of the past as he saw the historical record as being forever rigid in favour of the ruling class, which at all times has created the vast majority of

  2. How Important is the Knowledge of a Works Historical content in Understanding it?

    with the subject I am concerned about in mind, not at all in fact, but it does make a few interesting points on the subject. In particular pages 87-88; Rushdie is asking who has the right to rewrite history? However only a little while after, he does exactly that himself

  1. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    All evidence can be manipulated, edited and presented in such as way as to support a historian's opinion, thereby making it an interpretation. Throughout history, official records have been altered and deleted, expunging "historical blot[s]" as fits the bias of the powerful.

  2. Evaluate the arguments for and against oral history as an historical method.

    for knowledge and the protection of what we believe to know as truth. Individuallity is now encourged in the contemporary captialist society and with which will come new was of thinking, and new methods of recording history, or the truth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work