• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can historians be objective?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can historians be objective? 'You have reckoned that history ought to judge the past and to instruct the contemporary world as to the future. The present attempt does not yield to that high office. It will merely tell you how it really was' - Leopold Von Ranke 'There are no facts, only interpretations' - Nietzsche Here we encounter two diametrically opposed views concerning objectivity. It can be argued that "true" objectivity cannot exist, as history is more exposed to differing interpretations than any other discipline and to be "factual", dispassionate or truly objective would be at best unrealistic and at worst impossible. Historians, in their selective analysis of the past on the basis of surviving historical records and evidence, draw conclusions, which must necessarily be subject to their own individual interpretations - interpretations that are in turn subject to the historians' own individual ideologies. The fact that history is constantly being rewritten is testimony to the impossibility of attaining "true" objectivity. On the other hand, "true" subjectivity would constitute a threat to history itself as a discipline - the logical outcome of this would be to grant every historian his or her own perspective, no matter how out of synch with the "truth" it might be. ...read more.


Even so, using primary source data only does not necessarily result in objectivity as primary records are just as prone to their writer's personal preconceptions and can suffer from selectivity or even censorship. A Russian journalist close to the events of the 1917 Revolution could hardly have been expected to publish an uncensored, impartial account. Even film and photographs can be staged. In response to postmodernist views that historians' writings are invariably present-minded and therefore always subjective, Sir Geoffrey Elton maintains that historical study should be separated from the present - the writer should not be 'at the centre of the historical reconstruction' and should 'escape from his prejudices and preconceptions'. However, Elton concedes that, whilst the historian should aim for this detached subjectivity, their work is 'processed through [their] mind and pen'; therefore some degree of objectivity is always present. 1 Howard Zinn acknowledges that historical writing involves selecting, from an often-vast amount of source data, what will be presented. The writers' choice will depend on what they deem to be important or relevant to what they are writing. ...read more.


Carr argues that particular societies that historians belong to invariably shape their particular views or opinions on the past. This could be taken to mean that a truly objective historical enquiry cannot exist - how could it, under these circumstances? Carr goes further, stating: 'Great history is written precisely when the historian's vision of the past is illuminated by insights into the problems of the present'.3 Here, the "dialogue" is moving from the present to the past (events in society at the time of writing are influencing how the writer interprets the facts before them). Carr believes that it is equally important for the "dialogue" to move from the past to the present - here emphasis here is on learning from the past, history as a guide to future actions. Carr (like Zinn) assigns the utmost importance to historical study - he sees the historian as having a duty to analyse and interpret relevant historical facts, and the causal links between them, for the purpose of making 'fruitful generations'.4 Trevor Roper in a 1957 lecture agreed, saying history without usefulness is "mere antiquarianism", adding that history without controversy is "dead". To Carr, objectivity is not desirable - a good historian should be selective, and good historical writing is a product of subjectivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    and gradually the Celts were attracted [to the towns] by the porticos, baths and feasts. This source is not necessarily completely reliable. Tacitus was related to Agricola (he was his son-in-law) and so, although he was a historian, it would have benefited him to show Agricola in a positive way.

  2. Thucydides' historical technique.

    would have taken a very long time, and wasn't really necessary, as long as he got 'what was necessary.' Even so, it still does bring up a question; If Thucydides condensed the speeches how did he decide what to exclude?

  1. Alexander Von Humboldt in Colombia

    la t�cnica del arado, siembra, cosecha y proporcionaron los elementos y la infraestructura para desarrollar la actividad agr�cola en su regi�n.

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    The league funded the writer William Cooke Taylor (amongst others) to research their cause nationwide, as in 1838 the members of the league were from Manchester, they decided it would be vital for their campaign to know whether their feelings were mutual around the whole of the UK (they were),

  1. Discuss whether History can be subjective

    Groups not fitting the mould have been discarded by history or shown negatively. Historical facts are often interpreted to suit individuals. For example following the death of Gustav Stresemann, the Foreign Minister of the Weimar Republic in 1929, his Secretary Bernhard put together a record of his works that highlighted

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    This view is challenged by the two 'Greek Myth' articles published in 'The Guardian' during July 2000 and also by the feature film version of the novel. Of all the 'alterations' to the novel made by Shawn Slovo when writing the screenplay for the film, the most noticeable change is

  1. To what extent and why did Machiavelli’s views on politics and human nature in ...

    trusted at first are.'2 Machiavelli decided the best way to prove his worth to Medici was by writing a guide on how to be not only an effective ruler, but to rule in a way that would ensure the survival of his government in future generations, ensure 'the well-being of

  2. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    This proved to be an positive impact on peoples lives in Scotland because it enabled transport for leisure and importing goods much more accessible, therefore helping the country as a whole. Secondly, immigration into Scotland had a positive impact on Scots because Italians who immigrated managed to introduce a different

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work