• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can historians be objective?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can historians be objective? 'You have reckoned that history ought to judge the past and to instruct the contemporary world as to the future. The present attempt does not yield to that high office. It will merely tell you how it really was' - Leopold Von Ranke 'There are no facts, only interpretations' - Nietzsche Here we encounter two diametrically opposed views concerning objectivity. It can be argued that "true" objectivity cannot exist, as history is more exposed to differing interpretations than any other discipline and to be "factual", dispassionate or truly objective would be at best unrealistic and at worst impossible. Historians, in their selective analysis of the past on the basis of surviving historical records and evidence, draw conclusions, which must necessarily be subject to their own individual interpretations - interpretations that are in turn subject to the historians' own individual ideologies. The fact that history is constantly being rewritten is testimony to the impossibility of attaining "true" objectivity. On the other hand, "true" subjectivity would constitute a threat to history itself as a discipline - the logical outcome of this would be to grant every historian his or her own perspective, no matter how out of synch with the "truth" it might be. ...read more.


Even so, using primary source data only does not necessarily result in objectivity as primary records are just as prone to their writer's personal preconceptions and can suffer from selectivity or even censorship. A Russian journalist close to the events of the 1917 Revolution could hardly have been expected to publish an uncensored, impartial account. Even film and photographs can be staged. In response to postmodernist views that historians' writings are invariably present-minded and therefore always subjective, Sir Geoffrey Elton maintains that historical study should be separated from the present - the writer should not be 'at the centre of the historical reconstruction' and should 'escape from his prejudices and preconceptions'. However, Elton concedes that, whilst the historian should aim for this detached subjectivity, their work is 'processed through [their] mind and pen'; therefore some degree of objectivity is always present. 1 Howard Zinn acknowledges that historical writing involves selecting, from an often-vast amount of source data, what will be presented. The writers' choice will depend on what they deem to be important or relevant to what they are writing. ...read more.


Carr argues that particular societies that historians belong to invariably shape their particular views or opinions on the past. This could be taken to mean that a truly objective historical enquiry cannot exist - how could it, under these circumstances? Carr goes further, stating: 'Great history is written precisely when the historian's vision of the past is illuminated by insights into the problems of the present'.3 Here, the "dialogue" is moving from the present to the past (events in society at the time of writing are influencing how the writer interprets the facts before them). Carr believes that it is equally important for the "dialogue" to move from the past to the present - here emphasis here is on learning from the past, history as a guide to future actions. Carr (like Zinn) assigns the utmost importance to historical study - he sees the historian as having a duty to analyse and interpret relevant historical facts, and the causal links between them, for the purpose of making 'fruitful generations'.4 Trevor Roper in a 1957 lecture agreed, saying history without usefulness is "mere antiquarianism", adding that history without controversy is "dead". To Carr, objectivity is not desirable - a good historian should be selective, and good historical writing is a product of subjectivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    * In the exam, read the question carefully and pick the right question AND WRITE THE NUMBER IN THE MARGIN. If you don't, you might not get any marks for your essay. * Reading never does any good! Make spider diagrams, write out the points or even read them out to yourself when revising and will definitely remember them.

  2. Thucydides' historical technique.

    would have taken a very long time, and wasn't really necessary, as long as he got 'what was necessary.' Even so, it still does bring up a question; If Thucydides condensed the speeches how did he decide what to exclude?

  1. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    in 350-60 AD, and several rooms were decorated with Christian symbols at this time, such as those shown in the table below. A small chapel was also constructed at the site, presumably for the use of the family who lived at the villa.

  2. To what extent has the truth about the Spanish Inquisition been distorted?

    These crimes consisted of 60% of the Inquisitorial business. Having all but eliminated the incidence of 'Major Heresy', the primary function of the Holy Office came to deal with minor heresy. Despite this, in some parts of the country, as in Valencia and Aragon, a high proportion of arrests still

  1. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    To conclude, the Roman authors thought that the Celts were rather similar to the continental Gauls, but more barbaric in nature and old-fashioned. Caesar and Tacitus wrote that the Britons were still fighting in chariots, which were almost a thing of the past in the rest of the Roman world,

  2. Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

    His genius lies in the scope and manner of his unprecedented investigation and the relative importance he assigns to events and their causes - narrated rationally in human terms. His earnest and constant desire to understand 'the other' is what we post-moderns can continue to learn from Herodotus.'

  1. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    Through the eyes of 'Grazzi' in chapter 14, we see Metaxas as "quite small and pathetic". The description of him as "wearing a night-gown that was covered in a pattern of white flowers", is highly opposed to the usually "dignified" portrayal of fascist dictators.

  2. From a close study of E.M.Forster's "A Passage to India" and Julian Barnes' "A ...

    Another image from the first chapter is the woodworm and this also resurfaces in chapters three, five, eight and nine. Salman Rushdie described the book "as footnotes to history, as subversion of the given...Fiction as a critique". Barnes aims to raise the prospect of uncertainty in his book and does

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work