• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can historians be objective?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent can historians be objective? 'You have reckoned that history ought to judge the past and to instruct the contemporary world as to the future. The present attempt does not yield to that high office. It will merely tell you how it really was' - Leopold Von Ranke 'There are no facts, only interpretations' - Nietzsche Here we encounter two diametrically opposed views concerning objectivity. It can be argued that "true" objectivity cannot exist, as history is more exposed to differing interpretations than any other discipline and to be "factual", dispassionate or truly objective would be at best unrealistic and at worst impossible. Historians, in their selective analysis of the past on the basis of surviving historical records and evidence, draw conclusions, which must necessarily be subject to their own individual interpretations - interpretations that are in turn subject to the historians' own individual ideologies. The fact that history is constantly being rewritten is testimony to the impossibility of attaining "true" objectivity. On the other hand, "true" subjectivity would constitute a threat to history itself as a discipline - the logical outcome of this would be to grant every historian his or her own perspective, no matter how out of synch with the "truth" it might be. ...read more.


Even so, using primary source data only does not necessarily result in objectivity as primary records are just as prone to their writer's personal preconceptions and can suffer from selectivity or even censorship. A Russian journalist close to the events of the 1917 Revolution could hardly have been expected to publish an uncensored, impartial account. Even film and photographs can be staged. In response to postmodernist views that historians' writings are invariably present-minded and therefore always subjective, Sir Geoffrey Elton maintains that historical study should be separated from the present - the writer should not be 'at the centre of the historical reconstruction' and should 'escape from his prejudices and preconceptions'. However, Elton concedes that, whilst the historian should aim for this detached subjectivity, their work is 'processed through [their] mind and pen'; therefore some degree of objectivity is always present. 1 Howard Zinn acknowledges that historical writing involves selecting, from an often-vast amount of source data, what will be presented. The writers' choice will depend on what they deem to be important or relevant to what they are writing. ...read more.


Carr argues that particular societies that historians belong to invariably shape their particular views or opinions on the past. This could be taken to mean that a truly objective historical enquiry cannot exist - how could it, under these circumstances? Carr goes further, stating: 'Great history is written precisely when the historian's vision of the past is illuminated by insights into the problems of the present'.3 Here, the "dialogue" is moving from the present to the past (events in society at the time of writing are influencing how the writer interprets the facts before them). Carr believes that it is equally important for the "dialogue" to move from the past to the present - here emphasis here is on learning from the past, history as a guide to future actions. Carr (like Zinn) assigns the utmost importance to historical study - he sees the historian as having a duty to analyse and interpret relevant historical facts, and the causal links between them, for the purpose of making 'fruitful generations'.4 Trevor Roper in a 1957 lecture agreed, saying history without usefulness is "mere antiquarianism", adding that history without controversy is "dead". To Carr, objectivity is not desirable - a good historian should be selective, and good historical writing is a product of subjectivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. A Guide to Standard Grade History: Essay Writing

    * In the exam, read the question carefully and pick the right question AND WRITE THE NUMBER IN THE MARGIN. If you don't, you might not get any marks for your essay. * Reading never does any good! Make spider diagrams, write out the points or even read them out to yourself when revising and will definitely remember them.

  2. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    It is possible that the citizens of Kent were more similar to the Gauls, due to their amount of contact with them, and Caesar may have believed this to be a sign of civilisation, as the Gauls' way of life was considered not entirely uncivilised by the Romans.

  1. Alexander Von Humboldt in Colombia

    El car�cter human�stico de Humboldt se ve reflejado en su cr�tica a la esclavitud en el virreinato de la Nueva Granada, Humboldt se declarar�a partidario de los Derechos Humano recogidos en las constituciones de Estados Unidos y en los estamentos de la Revoluci�n Francesa y la Declaraci�n universal de los derechos del hombre y el ciudadano.

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    When the Times newspaper released an article stating that Peel was going to repeal the Corn Laws Lord Stanley resigned in protest, and Peel himself

  1. Discuss whether History can be subjective

    Groups not fitting the mould have been discarded by history or shown negatively. Historical facts are often interpreted to suit individuals. For example following the death of Gustav Stresemann, the Foreign Minister of the Weimar Republic in 1929, his Secretary Bernhard put together a record of his works that highlighted

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    This in itself seems uncontentious, but Rallis is the son of Ionnis Rallis, the leader of Greece's 'puppet regime' under the Nazis and is therefore likely to be biased. Another acknowledged source, Helen Cosmatatos is in fact British-born and married a Greek aristocrat in later life.

  1. To what extent and why did Machiavelli’s views on politics and human nature in ...

    trusted at first are.'2 Machiavelli decided the best way to prove his worth to Medici was by writing a guide on how to be not only an effective ruler, but to rule in a way that would ensure the survival of his government in future generations, ensure 'the well-being of

  2. Cranleigh Railwat Reconstruction

    During 1876 a passing loops were added at Bramley station and another at Cranleigh in 1880. In 1888 Bramley was renamed Bramley and Wonersh as the station halfway from the two village centres.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work