• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Bloody Sunday mark a turning point in the Romanov's popularity with the Russian people?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent did Bloody Sunday mark a turning point in the Romanov's popularity with the Russian people? Nicholas II was made the tsar of Russia in 1894 when his father (Alexander III) died. The Russian tsars had a strong tradition of autocracy and Alexander had followed this strongly. In part, this was due to his father, Nicholas's murder by a Russian political extremist group after he had started an "age of reform". This convinced Alexander to be more repressive than his father. Another reason for his views and opinions was his tutor Konstantin Pobedonostsev, who championed the phrase "orthodoxy, autocracy and nationality". Pobedonostsev taught these views to Alexander and Nicholas who followed them during their rule as tsar. Nicholas's did not believe in doing things for the good of the Russian people, just what was good for Russia herself, this meant that during his reign the number of political parties and people speaking out against the tsar increased (i.e. ...read more.


This shows that the people still trusted the tsar at this point and believed he could help them achieve their objectives and he was still popular because in the letter Gapon uses words like "humblest", "inviolability and he calls him "sire", if you were going to over throw someone then you would not use such menial language. The aims of the crowd were completely peaceful, all they wanted was; better wages, better living conditions, a reduction in the working day and an assembly where they could elect their own representatives. The crowd met and did march towards the winter palace despite warnings from the army not to. The cities authorities put soldiers in selected parts of the city where they could gain strategic advantages; this included the monument to Russia's victories over Napoleon in 1812 (when he tried to invade Russia) the Narva arch. Here the crowd met armed police and an assortment of army units including a group of Cossacks. ...read more.


Nicholas knew that he had angered his people so the governor general of St Petersburg told him it would be prudent to meet with representatives of the factories and he grudgingly agreed. At this meeting the tsar told the representatives that he "forgave" them and that before they left they could go and get some food from his kitchen. This further angered the people because it shows that he did not respect them and that he was just trying to act as though he was lenient by not punishing them and also that he was generous by letting them have some of his food. In conclusion, although the tsar was over-thrown by revolutionaries, it was not immediately linked to Bloody Sunday because it was 12 years later, however this event did bring sympathy for the workers cause and also made people see the flaw in the political system in Russia and did hasten the down fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Andrew Halliday 13RV ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    He was greeted a miracle worker by the Tsarina. There was also a bad side to his personality. Rasputin was a drinker and he was also a womaniser. He also had a bad reputation, even his name meant 'disreputable'. After the Tsar took the command of the armed forces, the Tsarina was left in charge of Russia.

  2. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    by force along with the seizing of power by the Third estate in Bordeaux. There was also a great effect in the countryside with risings immediately following in Normandy and Franche Comte, along with demonstrations against tax, tithes and the feudal dues to the extent that it seemed to the

  1. Assess the extent to which the political incompetence of Nicholas II led to the ...

    Arguably those are the characteristics that spill over (and intensify) into adulthood and also exploited by others. It seems that even Nicholas was unsure of what was expected of him as Tsar. The day after his father died, Nicholas said: "I am not ready to be Tsar.

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    literally begging for better quality of life and more respect in society. In the background there are peasants lying on the ground dead were they have been attacked by the soldiers which shows that the situation has got desperate. The petition very much reflects this image but what is shown in the image is said in words.

  1. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    Furthermore, the press was censored by the government to stop any information that could be potentially harmful to him from being released. However, as most Russian citizens were illiterate, this was unnecessary. There were numerous incompetent political figures appointed during Nicholas II's reign as Tsar, including the Tsar himself.

  2. what were the aims of collevtivisation, and to what extent were they achieved?

    We must do our utmost to develop large farms and to convert then into grain factories for the country organized on a modem scientific basis.' This shows that Stalin was clearly concerned about the state if the economy, and he was right to be - Russia's agriculture had barely any

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Source D must be reliable because it is an eyewitness account. Do you agree? Source D is the "nearest" to an "eye witness account" of the murders that took place on the night of 17th July 1918. However when considering the origin of the source one can see how the reliability of this source can be questioned.

  2. 'To What Extent Did Tsar Alexander III's Reign Mark A Major Change From That ...

    Not only this, but the actions of the 'People's Will' had hardened Tsar Alexander III's resolve that any attempts at reform were dangerous and could only affect the stability of the monarchy. He had seen the proof for himself, that the introduction of reform could only entertain criticism and opposition to the Tsarist regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work