• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did Charles I religious policies make the crisis of 1640 inevitable(TM)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent did Charles I religious policies make the crisis of 1640 'inevitable' Introduction Leading up to 1640, Charles implemented many religious policies in his multiple kingdoms; however this alone did not make the crisis of 1640 inevitable. Charles did not consult parliament and the Scottish government when introducing these religious policies, this left the public unsure of what was happening, forcing them to draw their own conclusions. This combined with the strong fear of Catholicism made the crisis of 1640 inevitable. England * Charles made Laud archbishop, who made many changes within the church (the beauty of holiness ect.) thus creating the impression that England was turning back to Catholicism. ...read more.

Middle

for example; the clergy were given much higher positions and better opportunities in the church now compared with the gentry. Ireland * Ireland was a strongly catholic country. This made it harder for Charles as he was a protestant ruler. Sir Thomas Wentworth ( appointed Lord Deputy of Ireland) attempted to unify the church under his rule of 'thorough' (a determined strong rule from the centre in partnership with Laud). This alienated all of the major groups in society; The New English, Old English, and Native Irish. * Many believed that Charles was using Ireland as a "Blue Print" for England to be made an absolutist state. ...read more.

Conclusion

This caused a lot of tension. * It can be seen in the National Covenant the discontent and hatred towards the new prayer book. The national covenant was drawn up to oppose the prayer book and show Scottish nationalism. * This caused the crisis of 1640 to become inevitable because it showed that the only way for Charles to have control in Scotland was if he was prepared to go to war. This would have required a lot of money. Although it also showed us how strongly Charles believed in his religious policies. To conclude it can be seen that religious policies made the crisis of 1640 enevitable, however there were other more important factors such as multiple kingdoms. Lucy, Jodie and Nina ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful?

    Communists could not tolerate peasants owning their own land so it had to be state controlled. There is a lot for the Communists to do here and Stalin has set a lot of targets. This means it will be hard for them to complete all tasks.

  2. What were the causes of Indian Independencein 1947, and was partition inevitable?

    In 1918 a flu epidemic killed 17m Indians which further burdened the country, and the British did little to intervene. This all pushed Indian for nationalism further and was the first main factor towards nationalism as they realised that the British were exploiting them.

  1. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    The "ROTAS" square This square has been found all over the Roman world. It seems to have no meaning as shown, but when re-written it forms two Christian phrases: Pater Noster ("Our Father") and A et O (Alpha et Omega).

  2. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    The league funded the writer William Cooke Taylor (amongst others) to research their cause nationwide, as in 1838 the members of the league were from Manchester, they decided it would be vital for their campaign to know whether their feelings were mutual around the whole of the UK (they were),

  1. The Suez Crisis

    Although there are some people who don't trust Eden and therefore show that this source is not reliable as it only shows one opinion. It also reflects source A as it compares him to Hitler showing his power and aggression.

  2. Death of King Charles

    He then went in to the place he was going to be executed. He saw the piece of wood he was going to have to lie on. Also there were 4 pegs driven into the wood to fasten the king.

  1. Constitutional Crisis

    On the 30th November, the Finance Bill was resolutely rejected by the House of Lords, by 350 votes to 75. The Prime Minister, Asquith, subsequently moved a motion to dissolve Parliament, declaring the act to be a breach of the constitution and usurption of the rights of the Commons.

  2. Northern Ireland

    This resulted in Protestants becoming boundary commissionaires. The links I could make between sources D-I is that although there are constant outbreaks of violence in Northern Ireland, there is also political Gerrymandering in areas to favour Protestants. Source G shows a drawing from a Protestant book showing Protestants being stripped naked and killed by Catholics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work