• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did medicine and public health change between the Roman withdrawal from Britain and 1350?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent did medicine and public health change between the Roman withdrawal from Britain and 1350? The Romans occupied Britain in AD43, and brought with them good systems of public health and logical solutions to medicine and treatment given to them by Hippocrates in around 300AD. This was then enhanced by Galen a little after the occupation, and this left Britain well managed in terms of public health and medicine. I believe that the high standard of public health severely deteriorated and the standard of medicine stagnated or possible got a little worse. Primarily, the public health system became undeniably worse. The water supply from aqueducts was almost completely cut off without the workforce of slaves and the skilled engineers. ...read more.

Middle

Some attempts were even made by the government to improve cleanliness, but the Anglo-Saxon wars were rampant at this time meaning kings were preoccupied, and unable to make any country wide decisions since the government was never unitary. Also, the latent laissez-faire attitude at the time prevented the government caring too much. With regards to public health, there was very little continuity between the Roman withdrawal and 1350 because everything was left in near anarchy so few changes could be made. However, I would argue that medicine only really stagnated. Because Galen backed the Roman Catholic Church in his theories when he said that the body showed intelligent design, any dissent from the techniques resulted in either being ignored or actively stopped. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course, the Christian Church now played a stronger role and had displaced belief in Salus and Asclepius meaning people instead prayed to God and the Saints such as to St Blaise for a sore throat. But, many of the books written by Galen and Hippocrates were burned in the anarchy caused by the withdrawal so some knowledge was lost, causing a possible slight decline in medical knowledge. Between the Roman withdrawal and 1350, medicine only changed a little and got slightly worse. To conclude, public health got a lot worse when the Romans withdrew taking with them a unitary government, a strong workforce of slaves and the army. However, while medicine did get a little worse with the loss of books it mostly remained the same with similar beliefs about cause and treatment of disease. (23 minutes) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What Impact did the fall of The Roman Empire Have On Medicine And Public ...

    The contained over 70,000 different items of medical writings. In 500AD the Roman Empire gets defeated by the Goths from Germany. The Goths couldn't read or write in the language the Romans used, so the Vikings and Saxons took over.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    Nodens was the god of hunting, while Sulis was mainly worshipped around the area of Bath. Throughout the Roman Empire, the people were allowed complete freedom of choice regarding their religious beliefs. So when the Romans came to Britain, instead of imposing their gods on the Celts, they attempted to link the Roman deities to their Celtic counterparts.

  1. Public health in Britain during the hundred years from 1850 to 1950

    (Medicine and Health through time book) The Great Stink was a time in the summer of 1858 during which the smell of untreated sewage almost plagued people in central London, England. Prior to the Great Stink there were over 200,000 cesspits in London.

  2. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    If this is taken into account, Tacitus' explanation does seem to be at least moderately plausible. He also wrote that the British day was longer than was normal in the Roman world. Upon the understanding that all days, whether Roman or not, would have been the standard twenty-four hours long,

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    So many were not trained in combat at all, Some men even went in to battle never having fired a gun before. Even Custer and the 7th Cavalry had only encountered the Indians once in the ten-year period of 1865-late 1875 on the western plains.

  2. Improvements in Public Health

    They needed to live in the bigger towns to have the opportunity to earn money in factories and workhouses. As London was rapidly growing, the health conditions got worse. Streets were filled with rubbish and dead animals and never cleaned.

  1. The Roman army

    soldiers received, which is illustrated in the extract below: "We owe our success against all other people to our skilful selection of recruits; to our teaching, as I mentioned earlier, of the use of weapons; to our hardening the soldiers with daily exercise; to our acquainting them in field manoeuvres

  2. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    Need Enabling Factors Military needs: the army needed to be fit and healthy (i.e. Military hospitals with extremely good hygiene) Money was available They believed prevention was better than cure ? wanted to make a statement about their beliefs They had a strong government They believed a ?Healthy mind was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work