• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did medicine and public health change between the Roman withdrawal from Britain and 1350?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent did medicine and public health change between the Roman withdrawal from Britain and 1350? The Romans occupied Britain in AD43, and brought with them good systems of public health and logical solutions to medicine and treatment given to them by Hippocrates in around 300AD. This was then enhanced by Galen a little after the occupation, and this left Britain well managed in terms of public health and medicine. I believe that the high standard of public health severely deteriorated and the standard of medicine stagnated or possible got a little worse. Primarily, the public health system became undeniably worse. The water supply from aqueducts was almost completely cut off without the workforce of slaves and the skilled engineers. ...read more.

Middle

Some attempts were even made by the government to improve cleanliness, but the Anglo-Saxon wars were rampant at this time meaning kings were preoccupied, and unable to make any country wide decisions since the government was never unitary. Also, the latent laissez-faire attitude at the time prevented the government caring too much. With regards to public health, there was very little continuity between the Roman withdrawal and 1350 because everything was left in near anarchy so few changes could be made. However, I would argue that medicine only really stagnated. Because Galen backed the Roman Catholic Church in his theories when he said that the body showed intelligent design, any dissent from the techniques resulted in either being ignored or actively stopped. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course, the Christian Church now played a stronger role and had displaced belief in Salus and Asclepius meaning people instead prayed to God and the Saints such as to St Blaise for a sore throat. But, many of the books written by Galen and Hippocrates were burned in the anarchy caused by the withdrawal so some knowledge was lost, causing a possible slight decline in medical knowledge. Between the Roman withdrawal and 1350, medicine only changed a little and got slightly worse. To conclude, public health got a lot worse when the Romans withdrew taking with them a unitary government, a strong workforce of slaves and the army. However, while medicine did get a little worse with the loss of books it mostly remained the same with similar beliefs about cause and treatment of disease. (23 minutes) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What Impact did the fall of The Roman Empire Have On Medicine And Public ...

    The contained over 70,000 different items of medical writings. In 500AD the Roman Empire gets defeated by the Goths from Germany. The Goths couldn't read or write in the language the Romans used, so the Vikings and Saxons took over.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    However, there were no major conflicts recorded during the occupation. Considering that the Celts were known to be a fierce people, it seems remarkable that the Romans had "tamed" the Celts. This also bought other benefits to Britain: after the fighting associated with the Conquest ended, cattle raiding, capture into

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    Indians thought he was not a soldier and so, thinking he was an innocent, left him alone. Because his hair was cut short for battle, others think that he did not have enough hair to allow for a very good scalping.

  2. The Roman army

    They therefore did not encounter such problems as the British did at the Battle of Hastings in 1066. The selection of recruits made sure that the army recruited only the best men: "Only men who stand 6 feet or at least 5 feet 10 inches are accepted for service in the cavalry or in the first cohorts of the legions."

  1. What Do Roman Authors Tell Us About The Celts? To What Extent Are Their ...

    time, it was common belief that the ends of the Earth were flat, and that Britain was at the end of the Earth (as the Romans had not reached beyond Britain and assumed that no land lay to the north of it).

  2. Public health in Britain during the hundred years from 1850 to 1950

    In the 1830' a civil servant called Edwin Chadwick was employed by the Poor Law Commission. After Chadwick's report in which he concluded that much poverty was due to ill health caused by the foul conditions in which people lived, and that the best way to improve anything was to improve their health.

  1. Improvements in Public Health

    This is because many people were so poor and uneducated; they had no choice but to live in these conditions. This was particularly relevant in London and main industrialised towns and cities where people moved from the country because many were losing their jobs.

  2. History of Medicine Revision Notes.

    Need Enabling Factors Military needs: the army needed to be fit and healthy (i.e. Military hospitals with extremely good hygiene) Money was available They believed prevention was better than cure ? wanted to make a statement about their beliefs They had a strong government They believed a ?Healthy mind was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work