• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...


History Coursework Assignment To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? During the development of Russia, the policies on agriculture changed between Tsarist and Communist rule. Did the policies on agriculture that they came up with consistently fail and did the peasants resist them under both Tsarist and Communist rule? The emancipation Statute of 1861 freed millions of serfs, and at first was welcomed. S1 says that the serfs previously been bought and sold like cattle. Alexander II freed the serfs without any accompanying civil war. There was, at first, little resistance from the serfs and the freeing of serfs was seen as a huge success. But it became clear that in practice and terms the changes were far less dramatic. It was an ideological situation. In reality most of the liberated serfs resented receiving too little land for their needs and having to pay far more for it than they could afford. Individual peasants remained bound in various ways to their village communes. ...read more.


Due to the lack of spontaneity, plans had to be imposed which ensured that they followed pattern regardless of local circumstances. These plans meant that Moscow received reports which it wanted to hear. So although under tighter Communist control their campaigns were usually good in theory they were not as effective when put into practice. This meant, for example as S4 points out, that the crops rotted in the fields, and there was no place to store grain. As well with S1 S4 and S6 shows a good idea but poor implementation. Stolypin's land reforms S2, as already identified, concentrated not on the bulk of the peasants but rather on the strong, the so called kulaks. By not concentrating on the weaker peasants to produce more instead of ignoring them and having them not be as efficient as they could, the result was that the peasants where very hostile to the Law of 9 Nov. This resistance reflected the limited lack of opportunity. The poorer peasants resisted the reforms as they see the government unconcerned with the mass of the peasants. Instead they were only prepared to help what was already working and not prepared to help what was not. ...read more.


'A generation of neglect and impoverishment'. The support of the peasants for the popular agricultural policies was however no recipe for success. Both S4 and S6 show willingness by the peasants but as S5 shows the total of crops and livestock did improve. 1958 to 1965 the targets projected that the increase should have been 70% not 14%. In conclusion it can be seen that the policies often failed to live up to expectations because even when the government had good ideas they failed to implement them properly due to neglect and adapt to change as shown in S1, S4 and S6 or because the peasants resisted the change and so it was their fault the government could not implement them as shown in S2 and S3. Some peasants were willing to comply with emancipation and take part in the virgin land scheme, but the government failed to implement it properly and failed to cope the changes. But they resisted Stolypin's reforms and collectivisation. The peasants did resist under both Tsarist and Communist rule but they were willing to comply with the new polices of both until those polices failed to live up to expectations and then peasants renewed their opposition. Martin Leonard Word count 964 (excluding question) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. To what extent did the emancipation of the serfs in Russiain 1861 improve the ...

    Not all serfs were treated in the same way and we cannot rely much on statistics either as these may have been manipulated. For example: "Between 1822 and 1833, 1283 serfs were punished by exile to Siberia; an annual average of 107 out of over twenty million proprietary serfs is hardly a staggering figure."

  2. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    The fact that Stalin ignored the cost in human life comes as no surprise as during the Purges, 8-14 million people died, a feat for which Stalin was directly responsible. In addition to this blatant disregard for human life, on the 12th December 1938, Stalin and Molotov signed the death

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    There is a hint in the source that the man has been brainwashed by Stalin and this is why he sees him as "God".However in stark contrast,Source F is very different to SourceE. Source F was written in 1936. It was written by Bukharin.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsar's family lying on the floor" and that "the corpses were taken out to the lorry" implying they were all dead. Moreover, both of these sources agree that the corpses of the victims - the Romanov family and their servants were transported elsewhere by a lorry for their destruction.

  1. How did the new economic policy cosolidate the boshevik rule?

    This soon strengthened the financial economy However the New Economic Policy was only one way in which the Bolsheviks consolidated their rule. There were many other factors as well. When Lenin cam to power, he knew he had to deliver what he had promised, Peace, Land and Bread.

  2. How Secure Was The Tsarist System in 1900’s.

    The tsar was more than happy to keep the majority in very poor conditions, as they knew no other lifestyle and could therefore not want anything else. On the other hand, a downfall of this lack 0f education was that the tsar could not promote either himself or his religious, political and social beliefs.

  1. Stalin: Man or Monster - Sources Questions

    Even though Stalin wrote it and the actual content is biased if one looks properly and studies the source carefully one can find a lot of evidence about the type of man Stalin was. 3) 'Pravda' was the communist party paper.

  2. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently ...

    This source does show that agricultural policies did fail, and caused peasant resistance to these policies, due to the hope the emancipation statue gave peasants of being free but then in reality they were still under the control of the tsar and the village Mir's.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work