• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? From these sources, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants consistently resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule. The abolition of serfdom had done little to gear Russia towards modernisation. This is evidently shown in source one with the peasantry remaining "subject to legal discrimination", i.e. they remained bound to their village commune. The introduction of the strip system saw peasants receiving "too little land for their needs" thus Russia found it increasingly difficult to feed the nations growing numbers. Emancipation was a failure particularly for the peasants who could do nothing to better themselves as change could only come from above. Continuity of this theme is present in source six where peasant initiative was treated with "instinctive suspicion". ...read more.

Middle

Continuity of peasant resistance is implicitly presented in source three. Stalin refers to the "greatest trouble" of his policy was to "explain" it to the peasants. From hindsight, we can see that this 'explaining' went beyond just talking, but dealing with resistance very severely. This is suggested later on in the source, but is subtle as a distortion of the actual truth. Stalin refers to giving some of the Kulak "land of their own to cultivate" in the provinces of Tomsk and Irkutuk. This is a very subtle way of expressing that peasants who opposed were sent into Siberian exile. Relating back to source one, we can see the continuity of quickly getting rid of resistance by Siberian exile, though source one expresses it much more explicitly. Stalin also refers to the "great bulk" of the Kulaks being unpopular and wiped out by their "labourers". This is an obvious distortion of the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

While this source appears to provide reasonably reliable data, there is no indication of where this source comes from. We cannot tell if true figures have been disguised. However, source four may give us an idea that source five does represent true figures. Source four highlights the failure of Krushchev's "poorly organised" virgin land scheme. The source claims the scheme was popular, but the leadership made a mess of it, "stupid decisions...ill-conceived strategies". However, this is one person's interpretation, the interpretation of Shevardnadse, who may be biased in his view maybe having a go at previous leaders to make himself and Gorbachev look better and show they will not make the same mistakes. Source six contradicts Shevardnadse highlighting that the Harvests were "badly affected by adverse weather". Leaders of course cannot control the weather. Despite this, the government was wrong to set unrealistically high aims. In conclusion, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture was a failure and that peasants consistently resisted it. However it was more of a failure for peasants, who suffered the worst of the policies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    He controlled everything that happened in the show trials, his word was the only word that went. The source was written after Stalin's death, meaning whatever was said was meant, and whoever wrote it wasn't scared of anyone whilst writing it which means the source is genuine.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    This is proof that Stalin was paranoid. As Stalin and Krushchev were very close, Krushchev probably felt he was safe from Stalin, however this may not have been the case as many times before, due to Stalin's paranoia he suspected people below him of trying to gain power, eventhough it may not have been true.

  1. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    he did, it was either the result of inevitably or his own personal choice. His stubborn and paranoid attitude hated being wrong, and therefore, not only would he struggle to admit his failings, but whenever a chance comes up to glorify one of his own policies, Stalin would take full advantage of it.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    the memory of Lenin and Trotsky by linking the policy of War Communism and the harsh measures necessitated by the defence of the revolution in war with the monstrous totalitarian regime of Stalin. As a matter of fact, even the most democratic bourgeois government finds it necessary to restrict democratic rights in time of war.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Economic development stagnated, government services were damaged, an entire generation of youth was deprived of education, and hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of people died. The worst years of the Cultural Revolution were between 1966 and 1969; however, many consider this tragic period in China's history to have persisted until Mao's death in 1976.

  2. "The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially ...

    Autocracy, nationality and orthodoxy were supposed to keep Russia away from harmful influences for change, such as democracy. The orthodoxy part of this belief emphasized the relationship between the Tsar and the Orthodox Church, while autocracy represented the Russian view of total submission to the Tsar of all his subjects.

  1. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    Emancipation of the serfs more effectively became inevitable. Therefore, by 1835, Nicholas I convinced that "Serfdom is a powder cellar under the State", set up secret committees to examine the means for the abolition of the serfs. At that time, the State peasants were allowed to be freed of personal servitude.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    The communists would gather groups of bedniak (poor peasants) and used them to drive out the kulaks in the villages. About 1.5 million kulaks were sent to Siberia and central Asia, many were worked to death. The kulaks that refused to go were shot or imprisoned.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work