• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? From these sources, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants consistently resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule. The abolition of serfdom had done little to gear Russia towards modernisation. This is evidently shown in source one with the peasantry remaining "subject to legal discrimination", i.e. they remained bound to their village commune. The introduction of the strip system saw peasants receiving "too little land for their needs" thus Russia found it increasingly difficult to feed the nations growing numbers. Emancipation was a failure particularly for the peasants who could do nothing to better themselves as change could only come from above. Continuity of this theme is present in source six where peasant initiative was treated with "instinctive suspicion". ...read more.

Middle

Continuity of peasant resistance is implicitly presented in source three. Stalin refers to the "greatest trouble" of his policy was to "explain" it to the peasants. From hindsight, we can see that this 'explaining' went beyond just talking, but dealing with resistance very severely. This is suggested later on in the source, but is subtle as a distortion of the actual truth. Stalin refers to giving some of the Kulak "land of their own to cultivate" in the provinces of Tomsk and Irkutuk. This is a very subtle way of expressing that peasants who opposed were sent into Siberian exile. Relating back to source one, we can see the continuity of quickly getting rid of resistance by Siberian exile, though source one expresses it much more explicitly. Stalin also refers to the "great bulk" of the Kulaks being unpopular and wiped out by their "labourers". This is an obvious distortion of the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

While this source appears to provide reasonably reliable data, there is no indication of where this source comes from. We cannot tell if true figures have been disguised. However, source four may give us an idea that source five does represent true figures. Source four highlights the failure of Krushchev's "poorly organised" virgin land scheme. The source claims the scheme was popular, but the leadership made a mess of it, "stupid decisions...ill-conceived strategies". However, this is one person's interpretation, the interpretation of Shevardnadse, who may be biased in his view maybe having a go at previous leaders to make himself and Gorbachev look better and show they will not make the same mistakes. Source six contradicts Shevardnadse highlighting that the Harvests were "badly affected by adverse weather". Leaders of course cannot control the weather. Despite this, the government was wrong to set unrealistically high aims. In conclusion, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture was a failure and that peasants consistently resisted it. However it was more of a failure for peasants, who suffered the worst of the policies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Some sources like source G and source L do not give a completely clear opinion on what Stalin was, a man or a monster. Source G is trying to justify Stalin's use of terror and executions. Khrushchev was the leader after Stalin and also believed in communism so he needed to keep the socialistic view of the party members up.

  2. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    Marx an atheist called religion the 'opium of the people' because he felt that priests taught people to except the miseries of life and to look forward to the after-life. In the civil war religious groups faced persecution, priests were killed and religious buildings were destroyed.

  1. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    The peasants were not allowed to travel or leave their villages unless with the permission of the commune. This meant that the peasants actually did not acquire full freedom -- this was what the government aiming at to prevent the forming of proletariat class which usually brought much unrest as in Europe.

  2. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    The political instability caused by the Cultural Revolution had an enormous impact upon the economy of China. Recognising that a period of stability was required, Mao stepped back from the day-to-day administration, and Premier Zhou Enlai embarked upon the reconstruction of the economy.

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    I repeat, our salvation from all these difficulties is an all-European revolution." (LCW, Vol. 27, p. 95.) He then concluded: "At all events, under all conceivable circumstances, if the German Revolution does not come, we are doomed." (LCW, Vol. 27, p.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    Bukharin would have had immunity from Stalin here. In the source Bukharin revealed that Stalin had an insecurity. This insecurity is that Stalin knows internally that he is not any greater than anybody else. Bukharin makes a revelation about Stalin which is very personal.

  1. How far do you agree with the judgement that Tsarist rule and Communist rule ...

    Russian people were taught "it was their duty to be totally obedient to the tsar as Gods anointed"4. However when the Soviets ruled the church was replaced by the communist party, the Soviets feared that the Orthodox church would be the centre of resistance to communism so power and the wealth of the church was destroyed.

  2. Stalin was able to obtain total power in the USSR by the end of ...

    But Trotsky had to bear some responsibility for the fact that Stalin survived Lenin?s Testament successfully, for even as Stalin?s ambitious character was more and more obvious, Trotsky still didn?t regard him as a threat, which we can see from the fact that Trotsky did nothing when Stalin was trying to befriend Kamenev and Zinoviev.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work