• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule? From these sources, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants consistently resisted it under both Tsarist and Communist rule. The abolition of serfdom had done little to gear Russia towards modernisation. This is evidently shown in source one with the peasantry remaining "subject to legal discrimination", i.e. they remained bound to their village commune. The introduction of the strip system saw peasants receiving "too little land for their needs" thus Russia found it increasingly difficult to feed the nations growing numbers. Emancipation was a failure particularly for the peasants who could do nothing to better themselves as change could only come from above. Continuity of this theme is present in source six where peasant initiative was treated with "instinctive suspicion". ...read more.

Middle

Continuity of peasant resistance is implicitly presented in source three. Stalin refers to the "greatest trouble" of his policy was to "explain" it to the peasants. From hindsight, we can see that this 'explaining' went beyond just talking, but dealing with resistance very severely. This is suggested later on in the source, but is subtle as a distortion of the actual truth. Stalin refers to giving some of the Kulak "land of their own to cultivate" in the provinces of Tomsk and Irkutuk. This is a very subtle way of expressing that peasants who opposed were sent into Siberian exile. Relating back to source one, we can see the continuity of quickly getting rid of resistance by Siberian exile, though source one expresses it much more explicitly. Stalin also refers to the "great bulk" of the Kulaks being unpopular and wiped out by their "labourers". This is an obvious distortion of the truth. ...read more.

Conclusion

While this source appears to provide reasonably reliable data, there is no indication of where this source comes from. We cannot tell if true figures have been disguised. However, source four may give us an idea that source five does represent true figures. Source four highlights the failure of Krushchev's "poorly organised" virgin land scheme. The source claims the scheme was popular, but the leadership made a mess of it, "stupid decisions...ill-conceived strategies". However, this is one person's interpretation, the interpretation of Shevardnadse, who may be biased in his view maybe having a go at previous leaders to make himself and Gorbachev look better and show they will not make the same mistakes. Source six contradicts Shevardnadse highlighting that the Harvests were "badly affected by adverse weather". Leaders of course cannot control the weather. Despite this, the government was wrong to set unrealistically high aims. In conclusion, it is clear to see that Russian government policy on agriculture was a failure and that peasants consistently resisted it. However it was more of a failure for peasants, who suffered the worst of the policies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    "Absolute turned a ruthless politician into a monstrous tyrant". This source doesn't mention any of the good Stalin achieved but only talks about his evil side. It is from a biography of Stalin published in 1974. the source claims that Stalin used terror and that he waned absolute power -"He was corrupted by absolute power", this is evident in the show trials he made.

  2. Stalin Sources Questions

    In source H, Krushchev picks out a prime example why Stalin was so fuelled with paranoia. A question like, "Why are your eyes so shifty today?" would have been put forward to an innocent civilian. If Stalin did not like their response he then would have killed them.

  1. "The Governments of both late Tsarist Russia and early Communist Soviet Union were essentially ...

    Overall, there are similarities of the aims of the two regimes in controlling the population - Lenin and Stalin required a certain level of dictatorial control in order for Communism to work and continue to work, whereas the Tsar harbored a genuine belief that it was their duty to lead

  2. Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death ...

    The Tsar relied on the elites to secure his position, and granted them a degree of localized power in return for their loyalty and support. This was an undeniable dilution of the "high degree" of central control referred to in the initial statement.

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    Husbands and wives now jointly owned the family property, where before it had belonged to the husband only. The law was very blunt: "All marriages are to be based on the free consent of men and women." Divorce was made easier to get.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    and most of the company expressed themselves in favour of a German invasion. Just for a test I asked them to vote on what they really would rather have - the soldiers' and workers' government or the Kaiser. All but one voted in favour of the Kaiser."

  1. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    warrants for 3,182 people and then went off to the cinema supporting this allegation that Stalin was a callous man who seemed unperturbed by the loss of human life. Also, in 'The Second World War' by Winston Churchill, Stalin is quoted as saying, "it was all very bad and difficult-but necessary."

  2. Was the Russian government policy towards the peasants and the workers in Russia from ...

    Emancipation of the serfs more effectively became inevitable. Therefore, by 1835, Nicholas I convinced that "Serfdom is a powder cellar under the State", set up secret committees to examine the means for the abolition of the serfs. At that time, the State peasants were allowed to be freed of personal servitude.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work