• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarists and Communist rule.

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently failed and that peasants resisted it under both Tsarists and Communist rule. The Tsars had ruled Russia for centuries before the October revolution in 1917 that led to the Tsars eventual downfall. This revolution brought Lenin back to Russia to lead and the start of Communist rule. When Lenin died Stalin took over the communist rule and he started making many policies to do with industrialisation and agricultural issues. A source one deal with the emancipation statue of 1861 and at the beginning of the source, agrees that the emancipation act did start off a good idea 'Alexander II freed more slaves than Abraham Lincoln'. As this emancipation was a moral achievement, serfdom was being noticed as wrong and trying to be solved. But the source then goes on to agree that the policy failed after in was put into practice stating ' most of the liberated serfs resented receiving too little land for their needs and having to pay more for it than they could afford. This provides evidence of how the introduction of redemption payments undermined the fundamental aims of the policy. There were major limitations to the emancipation act the main being that in the end the tsar still had control over the peasants.' the peasants were bound in various ways to their village communes'. ...read more.


I would infer that the peasant is from the Ukraine because there the reforms were doing ok and there were more fertile lands whereas in west Russia the lands were much less fertile and the weather conditions were much worse. This source does suggest that this reform did bring some success, but the overall picture was that many peasants preferred social security and not taking such risks by selling their land, and this then lead to the failure of the policy. Source three is a conversation between Winston Churchill and Stalin on collectivisation. But one thing to consider with this source is that we do not know where the source actually came from, as it is not in Churchill's diaries and nothing else is mentioned, this meaning it lacks some reliability. It is also Stalin's view of his own collective farm policy, so is another reason why the source has to be objectively. Churchill is talking to Stalin in a very positive/sympathetic way but really he had to considering the political situation he was in. The talk took place during world war two and at this time Stalin was keeping the eastern front open, helping Churchill. So he could not make an enemy of Stalin. The source does provide evidence that the policy was a failure, by referring to the collective Farm policy as 'a terrible struggle'. ...read more.


Source 5 backs up the idea that the scheme should have been more successful, as the target for 1965 was 170, and only 114 was achieved. Source six also agrees that Khrushchev's policy was on the whole a failure, blaming its failure on Khrushchev's inheritance of 'a generation of neglect' for its failure. What source six also points out is ' change could only come by order from above' which meant that the government policy on emancipation and the virgin lands caused the failure of these schemes as they were poorly organised. Like in source four and source one, the peasants were left with no initiative and no real freedom and success like they were always promised and never given. Alec Nove, the source writer who is a respected historian also mentions that about collectivisation 'ensured that they be imposed on a set pattern regardless of local circumstances, so as to report what Moscow wanted to hear'. This referencing to source three and how Stalin imposed the local farming policy. Overall, it is clear that the sources do agree that most of the agricultural policies did consistently fail and there was evidence that it was resisted under both Tsarist and Communist rule. Some of the sources do need to be treated with some question due to the writer of the source being objective as in sources 3 and 4, but all of the sources do agree that all of the agricultural policies during the period did fail to some extent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. China 1945-90 - source based questions.

    This open engagement in what Marx called exploitation, would never have been allowed in Maoist China. In education, only 80,000 out of one billion people received university education, Mao had decided the future of young intellectuals and made sure they would never become to powerful, they were no longer in a position to judge or denounce his policies.

  2. Russia 1905-1917 exam questions with mark schemes.

    These were the many more reasons that this source does not explain. * The following question is a 10 mark question. * You should spend roughly 18 minutes on this. * The question requires you to explain the contribution of three factors and then to compare their importance.

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    The hydroelectric power station in the back is an example of the great things Stalin achieved for Russia. This source suggests Stalin is a good man, but it was made by himself so how do we know this source is accurate?

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Many Republicans thought the New Deal was dangerous. The US Government was now intervening in everyday life in a way it had never done before. Some feared that this could bring about a dictatorship in America. Many businessmen believed that the government should keep out of business affairs, as the Republicans had done in 'the roaring twenties'.

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    His use of "striking propaganda" at this time would have been received as "Gospel" by the Russian people because they were so afraid of Stalin that they would have believed anything that he would have said. In all truthfullness Source D is a contradiction in itself.

  2. what were the aims of collevtivisation, and to what extent were they achieved?

    Stalin introduced collectivization because he believed it to be the answer to Russia's agricultural problems - In 1928; he said 'agriculture is developing slowly, comrades. This is because we have about 25 million individually-owned farms. They are the most primitive and undeveloped form of economy.

  1. Tsarist rule in the years 1856 - 1917 and Communist rule from the death ...

    Similarities can also be drawn between the fact that succession was always hereditary, and the leader of the Communist Party was always the General Secretary. However, there are differences with which the Tsar and the Bolsheviks used the elites to help rule the country.

  2. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    Sergeyev, being the ultimate provenance and the origin of these sources, decreases the sources' unreliability to a considerable extent as he was a supporter of the Provisional Government who were anti-Bolscheviks as they got rid of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work