• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources support the view that German attitudes and policies were responsible for a steady decline in Anglo German relations between 1890 and 1914?

Extracts from this document...


COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT PART A (c 500 words) To what extent do the sources support the view that German attitudes and policies were responsible for a steady decline in Anglo German relations between 1890 and 1914? Diverse historians conceive various ideas about Anglo-Germanic relations between 1890 and 1914 and who accounts for it. However, one can receive understanding and knowledge from historical sources written by various individuals. It is arguable that Germanic attitudes and policies were responsible for the steady decline of Anglo-Germanic relations. Evidently in Source 3: Joseph Chamberlain seems enthusiastic in bringing Britain together with '...the great German Empire' despite previous 'quarrels and misunderstandings'. This creates perceptions that Britain was willing to acknowledge Germany in an 'alliance', trying to reconcile relations, even after learning about the Kruger Telegram in 1896. Numerous of historians could imply that Germany were jealous of Britain's' naval strength, which perhaps is true because of the Weltpolitik policy which when established, became a clear defiance of the British naval rule. ...read more.


Germany felt according to Source 4 ' in a dangerous situation in Europe. Contradictory to previous arguments, historians have suggested that British insecurity and other factors could have contributed to the decline in relations. For example, Source 7 shows the British appearing to be apprehensive about the increasing German navy. However, a German artist painted the source, which makes it questionable because soon after the Entente Cordial in 1904 tensions were high between the Germans and British. Due to anxiety, that Britain felt towards Germany, the press, and the media constantly criticised Germany e.g. in Source 1, a journalist writes pessimistically about Germany. This source is debatable since the journalist's perspective could have influenced the validity, however, it reveals the negative attitudes, which existed amongst the British people towards Germany. After the Kruger telegram in 1896 the national feeling was that of anger which contradicted Source 3 where Chamberlain implied that Britain still wanted an 'alliance' with '...the great German Empire'. ...read more.


These sentiments is observed in Source 5, which states 'Along with the deterioration between two countries the feeling of insecurity and fear of Germany had grown', and 'German fleet could be used as means of diplomatic pressure'. As Roderick McLean has questioned, 'How could she (Germany) assert her right to a place in the carve-up of the world unless she had a formidable fleet?' This causes one to think about the situation before making a judgement about Germany's role in decline of relations. Historians believe that the extent in which decline was due to Germany solely is minimal. Most of the sources examined were based on personal perspectives, but one can derive from this that nobody was clear about the decline in relations, and who was responsible, so there will be no apparent answer. To conclude the decline of relations is not blameable on one party as both parties had parts to play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Trench Diary Assignment.

    Ss January 20th 1916 Dear Diary, Two years on and I'm still here, surely I'm in a nightmare which I would rather end right now. I can't believe it!

  2. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    As the evidence shows, these plans of attack were poorly organized, and badly carried out. The communication between the GHQ and the trenches was severely inadequate, leading to spur of the moment decisions, which proved, (more often then not), to be the wrong thing to do.

  1. "William II's foreign policy contributed greatly to tensions in Europebetween 1890 and 1914." Discuss.

    France, more than eager to come out of isolation, aided Russia. Such a partnership was reaffirmed by the Franco-Russian Friendship Alliance in 1893 and later, by the Franco-Russian Military Alliance in 1894. Germany was left without an ally on the eastern flank.

  2. Why and to what extent did Britain abandon Splendid Isolation under the Conservatives

    Boer war where lack of support had been demonstrated towards Britain and it had been difficult to defeat the Boers. Consequently Britain was beginning to wonder what would happen if she was attacked by one or more powers. However at this time even though Britain was on the look out

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    Germany now had a means of access to the Mediterranean. Bismarck had once said that when one is one amongst five powers, it is necessary to be "a trios". When Russia signed the Reinsurance Treaty, Germany was virtually "a quatre" among six powers.

  2. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    In addition, the tension between Russia and Austria-Hungary over the Balkans was pacified by the establishment of each one's spheres of influence. However, in the summer of 1866 a new crisis arose which drastically changed the order the system of alliances existing until then.

  1. German Foreign Policy - To what extent was the German Foreign Policy responsible ...

    The German colonies cost far more than they brought in and only provided a few thousand Germans with permanent homes. Britain was aware of the German eyes for expansion however it kept to its own policy and dealt with its domestic and imperial affairs during that time.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    Mussolini did not offer support to Austria and Britain and France did not intervene. The plebiscite held in 10th April 1938 showed that 99.75% of Austrians who voted supported joining Germany. Hitler saw the League?s appeasement as further proof that they were not prepared to take action to stop him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work