• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the sources support the view that German attitudes and policies were responsible for a steady decline in Anglo German relations between 1890 and 1914?

Extracts from this document...


COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT PART A (c 500 words) To what extent do the sources support the view that German attitudes and policies were responsible for a steady decline in Anglo German relations between 1890 and 1914? Diverse historians conceive various ideas about Anglo-Germanic relations between 1890 and 1914 and who accounts for it. However, one can receive understanding and knowledge from historical sources written by various individuals. It is arguable that Germanic attitudes and policies were responsible for the steady decline of Anglo-Germanic relations. Evidently in Source 3: Joseph Chamberlain seems enthusiastic in bringing Britain together with '...the great German Empire' despite previous 'quarrels and misunderstandings'. This creates perceptions that Britain was willing to acknowledge Germany in an 'alliance', trying to reconcile relations, even after learning about the Kruger Telegram in 1896. Numerous of historians could imply that Germany were jealous of Britain's' naval strength, which perhaps is true because of the Weltpolitik policy which when established, became a clear defiance of the British naval rule. ...read more.


Germany felt according to Source 4 ' in a dangerous situation in Europe. Contradictory to previous arguments, historians have suggested that British insecurity and other factors could have contributed to the decline in relations. For example, Source 7 shows the British appearing to be apprehensive about the increasing German navy. However, a German artist painted the source, which makes it questionable because soon after the Entente Cordial in 1904 tensions were high between the Germans and British. Due to anxiety, that Britain felt towards Germany, the press, and the media constantly criticised Germany e.g. in Source 1, a journalist writes pessimistically about Germany. This source is debatable since the journalist's perspective could have influenced the validity, however, it reveals the negative attitudes, which existed amongst the British people towards Germany. After the Kruger telegram in 1896 the national feeling was that of anger which contradicted Source 3 where Chamberlain implied that Britain still wanted an 'alliance' with '...the great German Empire'. ...read more.


These sentiments is observed in Source 5, which states 'Along with the deterioration between two countries the feeling of insecurity and fear of Germany had grown', and 'German fleet could be used as means of diplomatic pressure'. As Roderick McLean has questioned, 'How could she (Germany) assert her right to a place in the carve-up of the world unless she had a formidable fleet?' This causes one to think about the situation before making a judgement about Germany's role in decline of relations. Historians believe that the extent in which decline was due to Germany solely is minimal. Most of the sources examined were based on personal perspectives, but one can derive from this that nobody was clear about the decline in relations, and who was responsible, so there will be no apparent answer. To conclude the decline of relations is not blameable on one party as both parties had parts to play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "William II's foreign policy contributed greatly to tensions in Europebetween 1890 and 1914." Discuss.

    France, more than eager to come out of isolation, aided Russia. Such a partnership was reaffirmed by the Franco-Russian Friendship Alliance in 1893 and later, by the Franco-Russian Military Alliance in 1894. Germany was left without an ally on the eastern flank.

  2. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    List of Sources (2 Marks) Dupuy, R. Ernest and Trevor N. 1970. "The Encyclopedia of Military History". London. Oxford Printing ltd. Haythorntwaite, Philip J. 1991. "GALLIPOLI 1915. Frontal Assault on Turkey". London. Osprey Publishing ltd. Hickey, Michael. 1995. "Gallipoli".

  1. To what extent was Europe, 1890, an area of growing tension sowing the seeds ...

    The three countries agreed to maintain the existing territorial arrangements in Europe; (ii) to resist the spread of revolutionary (e.g. socialist) movements; and (iii) to consult one another if any international difficulties arose. France was being diplomatically isolated. But the underlying weakness of this personal understanding between the three emperors

  2. Notes on International Relations 1919-1939

    the Weimar Republic, were blamed for the Treaty of Versailles * The German people thought that Ebert and the socialists were traitors of Germany * Cartoon = starving child (The Well Fed German?) o Social comment on how the reparations were effecting the people of Germany * i.e.

  1. Trench Diary Assignment.

    one's eyes and one is recalled to the bitter realities of the moment by the officer's voice: 'Fifteen minutes to go, boys, get ready'. Immediately there is a great stir and excitement, a final setting of equipment etc and examination of arms and then a handshake with one or two dear comrades.

  2. German Foreign Policy - To what extent was the German Foreign Policy responsible ...

    The German naval expansion program had many domestic supporters. The Kaiser deeply admired the navy of his grandmother, Queen Victoria of Britain, and wanted one as large for himself. Powerful lobbying groups in Germany desired a large navy to give Germany a worldwide role and to protect a growing German colonial empire in Africa and the Pacific.

  1. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    Mussolini did not offer support to Austria and Britain and France did not intervene. The plebiscite held in 10th April 1938 showed that 99.75% of Austrians who voted supported joining Germany. Hitler saw the League?s appeasement as further proof that they were not prepared to take action to stop him.

  2. The most important aim of wartime propaganda was to encourage hatred of the enemy. ...

    It tells us how men joined the army through cinema. Instead of watching a movie, a girl had appeared on stage and sang a patriotic song; eventually everyone start singing along with her and then they sang the National Anthem, everyone was carried away by their emotions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work