• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Do These Sources Suggest That Nazi Policy Was Beneficial To the Working Class in Germany1933 - 1939?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Do These Sources Suggest That Nazi Policy Was Beneficial To the Working Class in Germany1933 - 1939? When the Nazis came to power, Germany transformed from a former depression country into a powerful world state but there is conflicting evidence as to whether the German working class benefited from the Nazi regime. Source A is statistical evidence showing a decrease in the number of unemployed people between the years 1932 (just under 6 million) and 1938 (0.4 million). Assuming this source is reliable, one can come to the conclusion that the Nazi policy was directly beneficial to the working class as many jobs were created, bringing employment, and therefore money, to many more people. The author of this source had direct access to official figures, so it is more likely that they are correct; however the Nazis would have wanted to create a positive public image for themselves by showing people that their regime was working and so the source may be biased. ...read more.

Middle

It supports my concerns raised about source A, saying that the workers 'often complain about the fact that they earn much less now than in 1929', however, there are some views in source D which have a more positive attitude to the Nazi regime, 'the years of unemployment have not been forgotten', this indicates that the number of jobs available rose under the regime. Source D also states that the workers are 'at the end of the day' glad to have work and draws attention to the fact that the worker's wages 'continually buy less and less'. Even though they have jobs, the workers are finding it increasingly hard to get by. From this source it appears that, contrary to what source A says, Nazi policy was definitely not beneficial to the working class. This idea of a fall in wages compared to those before the depression is also reflected in source C, the average gross hourly earnings in industry, from original German sources. ...read more.

Conclusion

The SPD agent is claiming that this is a publicity stunt for the Nazis, and that the Nazi regime is fooling workers into believing that this scheme is working. As they were obviously against the Nazi regime, they would not have wanted to portray the regime in a positive light, meaning that this report has reason to be biased against the Nazi regime. The truth probably lies somewhere in between the two sources. Some workers were given privileges through the scheme but the majority did not benefit and the experiences of those that did were exaggerated by the German Labour Front. All these sources show that the Nazi regime was beneficial to workers to some extent, creating employment for those that had none, but not up to the standards that they claimed. They tried to portray themselves as helping the workers and giving them more rights, but from the SPD reports we can see that this is untrue and that they exaggerated the work that they were doing at returning Germany to the state it was before the depression. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Daily Life in Nazi Germany:

    He argued that the communist revolution was an act of revenge that attempted to disguise the inferiority of the Jews. Kristallnacht, "Night of Broken Glass", name given to an incident that took place in Nazi Germany, on the night of November 9-10, 1938, in which a coordinated attack was made

  2. ­­How much support was there for the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1939?

    actually thought, but source A also has some use in seeing the way that all parts of society had to praise Hitler to keep any power. On balance, I think that source B is more useful. b) The author of this source thought that there was not really much actual support for the Nazi regime in 1936.

  1. Study all the sources.

    Overall source G disagrees with the claim "Kristallnacht was a spontaneous event by the German people" as it shows us that it was the Nazis who carried out the attacks and that the German people could do nothing about it.

  2. Assess the extent to

    unemployment, more income were received, Germans increased in wealth and hence greater propensity to spend and invest. All of these factors resulted in Economic activity and thus rapid economic growth whilst Germany's commercial power and links internationally grew. The Rearmament policy pursued by Nazi Germany resulted in the expansion of the German heavy industry sector, in particular armament production.

  1. Using the sources and your own knowledge, analyse the nature and extent of opposition ...

    Therefore religion alone as an opposition could never assert itself successfully enough to overcome the torrid constraints of Nazism. Also, it must be said that there were many people who remained less than complete supporters but the movement had touched the lives of the majority of the Germans so they

  2. The Final Solution - Sources Questions

    Source 8, by Phillip Sauvain, shows an account "By an American Serviceman," who's name is not told. Because there is no name given for the American Serviceman the source's reliability is questionable, the source could be made up. Because the American Serviceman's name is unknown it impossible to find out

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work