• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree that the years 1919-1931 were a period of illusory peace in international relations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree that the years 1919-1931 were a period of illusory peace in international relations? Ever since the outbreak of World War Two historians have argued whether the inter-war period, that at the time had been believed to be peaceful, had, in fact, been a period of what we might call 'illusory peace.' A fundamental component of this argument is the circumstances and outcome of the Treaty of Versailles. It is argued that the treaty "should have made the victors either to conciliate the enemy or destroy them. The Treaty of Versailles did neither. It did not pacify Germany, still less permanently weaken her, appearances notwithstanding, but left her scourged, humiliated and resentful"1 However, it is also argued that the series of Agreements and reparations plans agreed and implemented by the great powers show unity, diplomacy and compromise.; Even the Treaty of Versailles itself has a compromising nature, although this did become to its detriment thus showing that peace may only have been temporarily achieved or only nearly missed. ...read more.

Middle

The Anglo-Soviet trade agreements in 1921 are further proof that the great powers were willing to negotiate and compromise and could well have been successful. It was only later when supporting the Russian Communist government began to cause political chaos in Britain that relations began to deteriorate again; Prime Minister Baldwin did not ratify the Anglo-Soviet agreement, the Arcos affair caused Britain to accuse Russia of espionage thus resulting in the following breaking of all diplomatic relations and ending all trade agreements. Still, the point to note is that action was taken to achieve peace, and, for a temporary period, relations were improved and normalcy came a little closer to being achieved. Before Hitler's rise to power, a degree of peace with Germany was also achieved. With hindsight we can see that '"the fundamental significance of Versailles was emotional rather then rational. Allied statesmen, urged on by the pressure of public opinion, made peace in spirit of revenge and not to guarantee national security. "2 Thus, in the early to mid nineteen-twenties, tempers began to cool, people began to think that maybe the treaty had been too harsh on Germany and ...read more.

Conclusion

The German people started to demand more revisions which were bound to cause further problems in Europe and drag the powers into conflict yet again. The problem of the growing Japanese fleet and Japanese expansion was also a problem that could only accelerate the great powers into conflict. Previously Japan had failed to be fully recognised as a great power, but with the weakening of China it was inevitable that Japan might strike thus greatly altering the balance of power, and again, bringing the powers into conflict. It may have been na�ve to suppose that Treaties such as the Kellog-Briand pact in 1929 renouncing war, could prevent a world war from becoming inevitable. In conclusion, although with hindsight we may see this period as purely the calm before the storm, for a brief period negotiations were made and peace was almost, if not temporarily achieved by the diplomacy and compromise of the great powers and their leaders. Thus, it would be wrong to consider this period as a time of illusion, rather as a period of fragile peace. 1 Lentin, Guilt At Versailles (1984) 2 Anthony Wood , Europe 1815-1960 (1986) Charlie Matthews 08/05/2007 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Were the peace treaties of 1919 - 1923 fair?

    4 star(s)

    Her army was also limited to 35,000. This was fair and justified action, the territory Hungry was forced to give away was a good decision, the majority of people in that territory did not want to remain part of Hungry.

  2. The hitler years was it all bad

    All the new schemes Hitler introduced created thousands of jobs. The Nazi's also introduced the 'Strength through Joy' scheme which was when the really good and hard workers were awarded prizes such as holidays to the Mediterranean. The scheme was also introduced so that free time was not 'wasted' however it was also like a treat for the workers.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    punishment of Germany, other countries fought on her side and, equally, had to be dealt with. These countries were Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey. Austria-Hungary had to sign two peace settlements, indicative of the fact that this state was shortly to be divided into two.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    This economic boom continued up until the wall street crash in 1929 which caused crisis in America, and then worldwide. Despite this, up until that time America remained one of the most economically stable countries of the world, as well as maintaining a stable government allowing it to have power.

  1. Notes on International Relations 1919-1939

    Always associated with the Treaty of Versailles * The loss of the monarchy and army, both of which common Germans loved, was always blamed on the Republic * Hindenburg: o After the cease fire and before the Treaty, the Reichstag set about investigating why they lost the war o Hindenburg

  2. The congress of Aix la Chappelle, Troppau and Laibach were admirable and an enlightened ...

    Italy was placed under Austrian military surveillance. Aix la Chappelle stood for European unity but all it did was diminish the aim and divisions continued to centre upon the relations between Russia and the other powers. Metternich and Castlereagh opposed Alexander who appeared likely to become the most serious threat

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    isolate France so that the latter was not strong enough to take revenge. Dreikaiserbund - aimed more at preserving the status quo than being directed to a certain nation. Bismarck at first did not want to be tied too closely with any one of them.

  2. Post War Peace -even though Wilsons conception was considered idealistic, it was the best ...

    Another issue which once involved the matter of self-determination was whether Germany should be split into two, to give Poland access to the sea. The newly independent Poland had problems gaining access to the sea and the poles demanded a corridor through Germany, to resolve the issue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work