• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the treaty of Versailles related to Germany was justified both Politically and Morally?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do you agree with the treaty of Versailles related to Germany was justified both Politically and Morally? After the First World War (or the great war) the German sued for peace this peace treaty was to be held at Versailles, which is just outside Paris. Although this seemed a fairly natural place to have the peace agreement it was also the French getting back at the Germans. The Germans had held a peace treaty at the end of the Franco Prussian war (1870-71) at Versailles and this for said treaty was very humiliating to the French in both the terms and the fact that they had lost to the newly founded Germany; It was also a practical place for all the leaders to come to. The treaty had several main clauses these were that the Germans had to accept the war guilt and they had to pay reparations to all the allies except Russia who had drooped out of the war. The Germans also had to reduce the size of her armed forces from what it was at the end of the war to one hundred thousand men, she also was not allowed conscription, armoured vehicles ...read more.

Middle

As I have already said many people do object to the treaty of the Versailles however it is only for two of its clauses that people have big objections about these two clauses are firstly reparations and secondly war guilt there is also a slight bit of controversy over separating Germany into two however not many people have a problem with this. Firstly then reparations, at the time of the treaty of Versailles everyone thought that Germany should pay reparations even people like Woodrow Wilson. However in this agreement there were many disagreement with France being very extreme suggesting the sum of 3 billion pounds for just France, and the U.S.A. being very lapse. There was of course a middle ground and Britain stood there however they were swayed more to the French by the public opinion of the British public. Of course all of the countries had financial advisors to calculate how much it would cost Germany however they all seem to have had different opinions thus it is very probable that they influenced by their governments and put out the figure that suited them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Because they are better equipped and trained for its rules and intricacies than any of their adversaries."2 This of course is a point worth thinking about for it certainly justifies the need to have reparitons for Germany. The argument for having reparations is that the Germany has to pay damages for the damage she has caused (this is or course what reparations means compensation for war damage by the deafet state3 ). Thus there would seemingly be no problem for Germany to pay a ceratin amount of money for reparations thus the condition for paying repartion is justified. There is however the big problem as to how much Germany would have to pay in reparations. The amount that Germany had to pay did vary massovly with huge hyperboles from some of the powers e.g. the French finance minister M. Klotz estimated the damage done to France to be �5,360,000,000 however later the British ambasoder in paris estimated the damages to be about �859,000,000 which is almost 14 billion pounds less and some made huge understatements for example the one of the leading people in finance in America estimated it at only �3,000,000,000 which is tiny compared to the actual sum. Andrew Ho How justified was the 01/05/2007 Treaty of Versailles Page1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    In addition, their Navy was reduced, and according to Article 198, "The armed forces of Germany must not include any military or naval air forces." Germany's army was, in effect, useless, and without an air force, the Allies hoped that Germany would be unable ever to wage war.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Hitler's Reich. Lucent Books: San Diego, 1994. ? The Guinness Encuclopedia. Guinness Publishing (pgs. 341, 439, 441, 444, 445, 678). Middle Sex, Great Britain: 1990. ? Kirk, John. The Rise and Fall of A. Hitler. Johnson House. New York, 1979.#] Who can say for sure whether the Treaty of Versailles was fair or not?

  1. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    The League of Nations was also very successful in its social campaigns and both established many organizations and brought awareness of world problems. Thus, the League was greatly successful and competent at a social level. Nevertheless, since the League had many failures within its time it is to some extent

  2. How justified were the German objections to the Versailles Treaty?

    The treaty also said the Germans would have to pay reparations and although the amount was not specified, the Germans knew it would be big. These terms were very harsh, especially since Germany was one of the five major powers and was having to recover after the war, just like every other country involved.

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    Allies themselves.� Keynes believed that the terms drawn up in the treaty cannot support the new Europe economically and therefore will cause the depopulation of millions of people in central Europe especially with the new states being set up. This meant that the new states were very weak and can

  2. WHY WAS GERMANY SO DISCONTENTED WITH THE TREATY OF VERSAILLES

    and was wanted by the people. They also found the removing and controlling of their colonies unfair and said it contradicts the National Self-Determination rule, but the victors replied that they were under mandates; meaning they would teach the colonies to be civilised and once they are able to run independently they would let them.

  1. was the treaty of versailles justified?

    The British had: gained colonies on mandate because they expanded their empire, freedom of the seas because Britain wanted to trade with more countries, self-determination for eastern European states because it would keep peace and the German navy was reduced because it made the British navy the strongest.

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    It is obvious that other European Powers - particularly Britain, France and Russia - came to see Germany's policies as "unfriendly and provocative". You should attempt to separate German motives and intentions from the impression her policies created, and assess the extent to which this impression was justified.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work