• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do you agree with the view that Douglas Haig deserves his reputation as the Butcher of The Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THE VIEW THAT DOUGLAS HAIG DESERVES HIS REPUTATION AS THE ?BUTCHER OF THE SOMME?? Georgia Bron 9M Haig was born in Edinburgh on 19 June 1861. He was born into a wealthy family that had good business. When Haig was younger he went to a good school and in 1884 went to Royal Military Academy at Sand Hurst. He first served as a Calvary Commander; however this experience was not useful in the battle of Somme because it was trench warfare which was a new kind of war so he couldn?t use the same tactics. He was also a celebrated commander of the Boer war, but the Africans were weaker and were poorer equipped. The Battle of Somme started in July 1st 1916. It was planned as a joint French and British operation. The idea originally came from the French Commander-in-Chief called Joseph Joffre and Haig accepted it. The battle was launched on the 1st July 1916. The French achieved there objective but whilst doing this there were 7000 casualties however the British weren?t successful and on the first day they had 60 000 casualties, including 20 000 dead however in the final result the British did win. ...read more.

Middle

General Douglas Haig didn?t listen to any military ideas of experts he just believed in the way he did things because of his ignorance a lot of things went wrong. For example he didn?t listen to what any one else had to say and ordered to use the tanks in September to use them to break through. Instead 29 broke down before they even got to the German trenches and the rest got stuck in the mud. So once again Haig?s plan failed. In 1919 Lovat Fraser a fighting soldier stated ?Haig was unimaginative and dull, nothing can excuse the casualties of the Somme? Lovat Fraser might think of Haig like this because of Haig?s plans and tactics many of his team may have lost their lives and Haigs the one to blame. In 1916 a letter was written to the Daily Telegraph questioning the way the war was fought and if they really should have won it ?We are slowly but surely killing of the best of the male population of these islands. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even though he did use his same tactic more than once at least it finally worked. In 1992 Colonel J.H. Boraston praised Haig and said how well the battle was fought ?The battle of Somme was a great triumph for the genius of British leadership.? General Haig decided to use the tanks because he hoped to end the battle sooner and so the tanks would protect them against machine-gun fire. To conclude people have their different opinions of General Douglas Haig and there different reasons. I don?t think he deserved the reputation as ?The Butcher of the Somme? but I do think there are a lot of things he should have changed and tried differently. Even though in the end he did win with his tactic too many people were injured and killed then they should have been. It is easy to understand why people think he does deserve his reputation as ?The Butcher of the Somme? and its easy to understand why people don?t think he does. So I think the name ?The Butcher of the Somme? is a bit farfetched but he didn?t do as well as he could of done during the Battle of the Somme. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    People didn't think much of Haig, after his infamous losses at Passchendaele, the Somme, and Verdun (to name a few), but he still collaborated well with Foch. He had been demoted by Lloyd George, who according to Haythornthwaite, 'sought to establish greater control over Haig'.

  2. Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the Butcher of the Somme?

    persuaded himself in what he believed in this source looks at all generals and compares them amongst each other, which may be seemed as a valid interpretation. However this source also seems not valid as it may be biased. Another explanation that has given historians to hold their interpretation that

  1. Haig, Butcher of the Somme

    There were heavy losses, but Haig warned of this beforehand and the government did not object. When it became clear that little progress was being made David Lloyd George did not remove Haig from his position. This suggests British high command was satisfied with his tactics and the results.

  2. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    There was no way Haig could take on every job himself, he had to assign some things to his generals. Rawlinson, Haig's second-in-command often gave in to Haig, even when he [Rawlinson] knew that a plan wouldn't work. This meant that some of Haig's mistakes in the battle were actually Rawlinson's fault for not sticking up to Haig.

  1. How important were Haig's tactics in bringing an end to WW1?

    Lloyd George could have stopped the attack all together but that option was impossible because of Haig's friendships with the King and other people in the war cabinet. Finally, Lloyd George could not delay Haig any more he had to give him the go ahead due to the pressure from the King.

  2. To what extent was appeasement justified?

    The mutual agreement in standing up to Communism was another reason why appeasement took place and why it was justified. At that point of time, Hitler was not the only concern of Britain and its allies, in fact, they were not worried about Hitler, but rather the spread of Communism and the dangers that Stalin was bringing to the world.

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    The negative views on General Haig were not only held by people in the home front. Fred Pearson, a private on the Western Front, commented on Haig in a local newspaper in 1966. He stated that Haig was 'the biggest murderer of lot'.

  2. was haig butcher of the somme

    Lansdowne suggests that they are losing the 'best of the male' generation and questions if they 'can afford to', showing he believes that Britain could not 'afford' such butchery and it shouldn't be tolerated. 4) Was Haig a Butcher? Finally I must come to a conclusion as to whether Haig

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work