• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does Alexander II deserve the title

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

When Alexander the second came to power in 1855, he inherited many of the problems that augmented from his previous predecessor, Nicholas the first. This led the tsar to undertake a series of great reforms, which gave him the charming title of "Liberator". However, were his motives clearly to bring change and a better Russia or were there other motives? Did he expect something in return? After all, for the sake of autocracy he couldn't just welcome liberation with arm wide open, but rather with a wary handshake. Perhaps the most significant reform was the emancipation of the serfs. This sought to update the structure of the current serf system and in turn reverse the fortunes of the failing nobility. ...read more.

Middle

Unrest would die down subsequently in the countryside. Alexander the second did not fail entirely though. Nobles were compensated with political power for the reduction of their land. One must also consider the awful conditions already at the countryside before reform. The tsar at least made an effort to combat the out- dated structures. The tsar also tried to reform the local politics and the economy. The zenistra (local council) would govern over many issues such as education. Despite early fast establishments of the council, by 1917 only 43 of the 70 provinces of Russia were converted. With the duma (created in 1870), cabinet, the zenistra proved to be quite useful with 15,000 extra schools being introduced by 1880. ...read more.

Conclusion

It may be unfair to name Alexander the second as a selfish Machiavellian, as he did not have perhaps, the mental capacity. His reforms seemed not to be measured but were reflections of his personality, because of their blatant inconsistency. The tsar could be seen in some context as a liberator, simply for attempting to develop an undeveloped, traditional ruling philosophy. As the lonesome ruler over Russia the tsars had to control and decide its fate. Emancipation was at least given priority, which had been demoted for many years. It may not have been the ideal end result, especially for the peasantry, but it had reversed old age policies. Liberation may have been instilled with some importance and credibility, but above all else, autocracy had to be upheld. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861?

    5 star(s)

    His naivety was a disadvantage to the young tsar. As his reign carried on, his subjects got increasingly more desperate and this caused an increase in their revolutionary activities. However, through the evidence presented in this essay, it is to be concluded that it was the realisation that Russia's economic system, if is was to be modernised as it

  2. Why and with what results did Alexander II abolish serfdom in Russia?

    legal system, local governments, education system and in the way of censorship. He introduced local legal authorities, significantly relaxed censorship, abolished corporal punishment, established new education institutions and set up district assemblies in 1864. All these extra reforms put the emancipation into a seemingly liberal context.

  1. Why and with what consequences did Alexander II adopt more reactionary policies in the ...

    The Narodniks generally believed that Capitalism was not a necessary result of industrial development, and that it was possible to skip Capitalism all together, and enter straight into a kind of Socialism. Chernyshevsky was a great adept of Russian intellectual, Herzen.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Under the inspired leadership of Leon Trotsky, the shattered remnants of the old army were rapidly welded into a new force - the Red Army. The very fact that the Red Army could be so rapidly created out of nothing is sufficient proof of the mass base of the revolution.

  1. To what extent was the storming of the Bastille the most significant event of ...

    extent that there was a feeling that law and order had generally collapsed all over France. While the Bastille played a major part in the onset of the revolution, there are many other factors, which must be considered. It seems that a great cause of the popular unrest was not

  2. How valid is the view that the reign of Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    intelligentsia who view the Tsar as incompetent and na�ve for not foreseeing the problems that the Emancipation Statute caused. Another area in which Alexander showed a great energy for reform was the military. After the tragic defeat in the Crimea, the Russian military's organization and reputation lay in tatters.

  1. How valid is the view that the reign of, Alexander II achieved nothing of ...

    These reforms were carried out by Alexander's brother, Constantine. Education was also dramatically reformed. Before the reign of Alexander II education had only been available to those who had the money to fund private tuition for their children. However, now, education was liberalised.

  2. To what extent is the title “Tsar Liberator” a true description of Alex II?

    In 1861 the Edict of Emancipation was announced, 44 million serfs were 'set free'. The rules for the Edict of Emancipation were that the nobles received compensation, and the peasants were free to own land. Although, the peasants received 3 hectares, they had to pay for it for 49 years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work