• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the "Good Friday Agreement" represent a turning point for the Northern Ireland peace process?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does the "Good Friday Agreement" represent a turning point for the Northern Ireland peace process? Until the mid-1990s Sinn Fein was an uncompromising republican party. It believed in a united Ireland with no links to Britain whatsoever. Another belief of the party was that the IRA had the right to use armed force to achieve its aims. For most of the 1970s however the party had a relatively insignificant role in the republican movement. IRA leaders believed totally that in the armed struggle and not in election campaigns. It was only in the 1980s that these ideas changed, since 1969 no candidates had been put up for local or national elections. In April 1981, the hunger Striker Bobby Sands was elected as MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone in a by-election following the death of the other hunger striker, Frank Maguire. Sands was a senior IRA commander, he had been a member of the IRA since he was 18, and since 1976 he had been imprisoned for the possession of explosives and the intention of using them. He initiated the second set of hunger strikes in 1981, even though members of the party had disagreed with this option. He was well aware that hunger strikes had a big impact upon propaganda in Northern Ireland as well as in Britain. ...read more.

Middle

Slowly, new thinking was beginning to emerge within the republican movement. This became clear when the IRA declared a ceasefire on the 31st of August. Under two months later the republican parliamentaries also declared a ceasefire. However, this did not move the majority of the Northern population nor the Southern. People had seen many ceasefires come and go; yet this was different as the people found out when they enjoyed the quietest Christmas they had had for years in 1994. In earl 1995 the ceasefires that had been recently committed were followed by a Joint Framework Agreement. This was thought up by the British and the Irish governments and was a plan for peace in Northern Ireland, including a brand new assembly for Northern Ireland and North-South issues. It set the agenda for the talks, which resulted in the Good Friday Agreement. It was generally accepted and welcomed, and in 1995 there was the lowest death toll that Northern Ireland had had for years. However there was still some opposition and people with doubts about the newfound solution: The Unionists were suspicious about the plan for a North-South Council of Ministers, they were anxious about wether it would lead to a United Ireland. Alongside this worry, the Unionists, along with the British government wanted to see the decommissioning of all IRA weapons, however Sinn Fein said that the IRA would not give up weapons because it did not trust the British government. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bill Clinton took it into his own hands to encourage various opposing leaders to talk or to compromise with their ideas. From April the 6th onwards Tony Blair, Bertie Aherne and the Northern Ireland leaders were negotiating non-stop at Stormont. 'I am pleased to announce that the two Governments and the political parties of Northern Ireland have reached and agreement' This is the statement that was made by Senator Mitchell on April the tenth regarding the decision made by the two governments to make an agreement. Although this was a big step it was only the beginning. In May of 1998 a referendum was held in which the people of Northern and Southern Ireland were asked whether they were prepared to allow Articles two and three to be removed. Ninety four per cent of the Southern population was in favour of this action. In Northern Ireland seventy-one per cent were in favour, although not as big as that in the Republic it still displays the large amount of support from both sides. In my opinion this gesture of potential co-operation shown by both the North and the South of Ireland depicts a positive future for Ireland. Due to this response to the Good Friday Agreement, I believe that this is a turning point in the history of Ireland, and that the outlook for the future of Ireland is indeed a lot brighter than it was. Therefore I believe that the Good Friday Agreement and the enthusiasm shown towards it is a major turning point for Ireland. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Northern Ireland 1965-85 essays

  1. How successful were the British Government in brining peace to Ireland?

    to getting 13% of the vote in the election in June 1983. This shows that the strike had helped to gain support from ordinary Catholics as it had set out to do. After the abolition of special category political prisoners had failed the next thing the British Government introduced was the Anglo-Irish Agreement.

  2. The Good Friday Agreement

    After the Good Friday Agreement, Gerry Adams, the president of Sinn Fein, encouraged most republicans to express their views without violence. This made vast improvements, as the number of violent crime fell dramatically with the exception of the Omagh bomb.

  1. How has Northern Ireland changed since the Good Friday Agreement, and what previous attempts ...

    Security issues have vastly improved since the Good Friday Agreement. The RUC (Royal Ulster Constabulary) were considered to be corrupt by many, especially nationalists, who had not forgotten internment; where people could be arrested without evidence and for no reason.

  2. Northern Ireland

    forces because they shot at innocent people and now Catholics will expect them to shot at anyone who is Catholic. The events at Bloody Sunday still cause controversy today because the leader of the troops got an O.B.E. instead of being punished for what happened, the action of him getting an O.B.E.

  1. Free essay

    troubles in northern ireland

    and dates, as well as giving us a clear view certain roads in Derry; this includes Strabene Road, Irish Street and Urrivady Road. Although this map does not show any signs of violence, it is because of sources like this that we understand why there were Catholic protests in 1969, two years after this source was created.

  2. Peace and Justice (corrymela)

    Human need: poor quality of life, unfair distribution of wealth, suffering etc. 14) Can peace be achieved without justice? Perhaps in the short term peace can be achieve, by stopping all fighting. However if this is achieved unjustly it will inevitably lead to a rebellion as people will fight for justice.

  1. Why has it been difficult to obtain peace in Northern Ireland?

    The media coverage of Bobby Sands death sparked a wave of support and sympathy around the world for him, the other hunger strikers, and what the IRA were trying to achieve. There were huge protests on the street and violence around the country in support of what the strikers were doing.

  2. Why was it so hard to establish a regional police force in Northern Ireland ...

    It has taken so long for the same reasons as the last 79 years. The way Northern Ireland was formed in 1921 after the Easter Rising of 1916 meant that the nationalists rejected the authority of the RUC from the very beginning.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work