• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent had the policy of collectivisation achieved its aims by 1941?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent had the policy of collectivisation achieved its aims by 1941? In January 1930, it was announced by Stalin that 25% of grain producing areas were to be collectivised by the end of the year. This was due to a variety of factors. In 1928, Lenin's NEP was abandoned by Stalin who saw it to be an encouragement of private enterprise. In a speech in 1928 Stalin said that agriculture was developing very slowly and told the USSR that the 25 million individually owned farms were the 'most primitive and undeveloped form of economy.' Stalin said he wanted the USSR to be a 'country organised on a modem scientific basis.' In some ways Stalin was correct. The USSR was extremely backward with practically no modern technology or agricultural tools of any kind. Industry was almost non-existent and Stalin needed a more powerful industrial force in order to transform the USSR and ensure its self-dependency. Collectivisation was by no mean voluntary, as many party officials had thought when Stalin initially announced it. Force, terror and propaganda were the tools used by Stalin to ensure the peasants would not be able to stop the procurement of grain. ...read more.


Under the direction of a committee, the peasants would farm the land as one unit but be allowed to keep their own private plots for growing vegetables or keeping animals. It was hoped this was that grain production would rise and the peasants would also be kept suitably satisfied. This would encourage them to cooperate with the government and in turn help industry to grow. By February 1930, party members claimed that a half of all peasant households had been collectivised. In reality this was at the very least a terrible exaggeration. The agricultural 'achievements' of collectivisation were nothing short of disastrous. Peasants resisted ferociously. One riot lasted almost a week and armoured cars had to be brought in order to control the peasants. The peasants slaughtered their animals and ate them and burnt tools, crops and houses rather than give them over to the kolkhoz. The number of cattle in particular was cut in half from 1928-1933. This in turn led to a mass shortage of meat and milk in many areas of the USSR. In order to calm the situation down, Stalin blamed his officials in an article in Pravada calling them 'dizzy with success'. He then halted collectivisation much to the shock of many peasants as well as party officials. ...read more.


This shows that the government could now extend its reach wherever required. Secret police were rife and reported any areas of concern. The peasants who had just began to strengthen their positions, were ultimately crushed socially and emotionally. Village commune was banned and the influence of traditional social roles removed. This included priests, teachers and anyone else who may have caused trouble for Stalin and the communist government. As well as strengthening his position within his own party, Stalin had shown his willingness to sacrifice lives in order to achieve his goals and this was not something the peasants would ever forget. Under no circumstances had collectivisation met even nearly all the aims it had set out to do. For the peasants it was a social and agricultural disaster, which involved mass suffering and death. But the Communist government chose to brush aside the clearly disastrous effects of collectivisation. Instead they continued to export grain in huge amounts regardless of the condition of the USSR's own people. The government very selectively focused on the political and industrial successes brought about by collectivisation whilst choosing not to acknowledge mistakes and an obvious lack of planning and organisation with the campaign. In conclusion, it can certainly be argued that despite all the failures particularly economically, collectivisation succeeded in it's main purpose which was to provide the necessary resources for industrialisation no matter what the cost. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    * The push for industrialisation was on. However, at the end of the 1920s it seemed that the NEP had run out of 'push'. By 1926, the excess capacity in industry had been used up. This meant that all the factories, machinery and equipment that had existed pre-1914 had all

  2. To What Extent was Collectivisation an Economic and Political Disaster

    The "twenty-five thousand" were the party members sent from the towns into the country to attempt to restore food production levels. They had no idea of farming techniques and only added to the disruption and chaos. The little grain that was being produced was being exported as "surplus" to gain external capital that was essential to the industrialisation process.

  1. Between 1928 and 1941 Stalin had a huge effect on Russia.

    The Tsar survived and crushed the revolution by firstly arresting and then exiling revolutionist leaders, so revolutionists had far fewer leaders to march them, and secondly by using the army to fight street fighters (as it was loyal to the Tsar)

  2. Stalin Coursework - sources explaining collectivisation and its effects.

    Furthermore, the correspondent states how he "walked alone though villages and twelve collective farms". The fact that he walked through only 12 collective farms when there were at least 50 State farms, meaning that the correspondent didn't see the whole picture and perhaps he purposefully visited the 12 worse State

  1. what were the aims of collevtivisation, and to what extent were they achieved?

    which was a problem for the Bolsheviks as they were majoritively from an urban background and did not understand the complexities of peasant lifestyles. Stalin enforced collectivization with brute force, showing his desire to make sure that his commands would be obeyed.

  2. How far by 1941, had the Soviet economy benefited from changes in agricultural policy ...

    He did not think it was because collective farms were not working he just immediately put the blame on the Kulaks and ordered them to be exterminated. On the other hand source A can be seen as good source of information to tell us how far the economy benefited from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work