• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has the truth about the Spanish Inquisition been distorted?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent has the truth about the Spanish Inquisition been distorted? The truth about the Spanish Inquisition has been distorted to a varying degree. It was first established in 1478 in Castile under Queen Isabella I and suppressed in 1834 by Queen Isabella II. It has left a mark on the whole of Spanish history and is traditionally been regarded as a barbarous, repressive instrument of racial and religious intolerance that regularly employed torture and the death penalty as punishments and was responsible for severely restricting Spain's development for generations. However, with the aid of sophisticated new technologies, modern historians have begun to analyse the records of the Inquisition and claim that the above explanation is not the full truth. There is evidence to suggest that the Inquisition was used as an exterminator of Protestants and Jews. At the first auto de fe - held in Seville on the 6th of February 1481 - six Juidaisers were burnt at the stake and numerous others sentenced to various punishments. Between 1481 - 1488 (according to Bernaldez, a contempory advisor) 'the Inquisitors burnt over seven hundred persons and reconciled over five thousand and threw many into perpetual prison'. ...read more.


Therefore, the truth of the Inquisition's primary function as the exterminator of Jews has been distorted but if the problem had not been dealt with and there were still many 'Major heretics' in Spain, this primary function may have continued. The Inquisition has become notorious for its use of torture. This can be seen in engravings created by artists of the time. However, as Henry Kamen claims, 'most of the excruciating types of torture to be seen in engravings exist only in the artist's imagination'. This is backed up by the fact that out of 2354 people arrested by the Inquisition in Valencia between 1478 and 1530, only twelve are known to have been tortured. Overall, torture was used by the Inquisition but not as much as it has been claimed. The truth has therefore been distorted to a degree. The Spanish Inquisition has been seen as the 'most cruel and bloodthirsty tribunal of all time. This can be seen in the events of the first auto de fe as explained before. Also, in the terrible holocaust of the 1480's it was common to burn at the stake as many as one third of those arrested. ...read more.


Another thing that people are confused about in terms of the Inquisition is that it was not set up nor controlled by the Pope, and after the early 16th century the Papacy ceased to have any active link with it. Nothing like it existed anywhere anywhere in the Catholic Church, and to a extent it was more of a Spanish than a Catholic tribunal. Within Spain it was so allied to, and dependent on, the Crown that later historians often considered it a secular rather than an eccliastical body. However, this is more of a misunderstanding that people have than truth being distorted. Overall, on balance, the Inquisition did bring terror to many communities. In 1487 hundreds of conversos fled from Barcelona rather than face the vigours of the Inquisition's enquiries. However, as many of revisionist historians have made clear, the terror of the Inquisition has been exaggerated by Protestant myth. Torture was used less than in ordinary courts and acquittals or mild penalties were far more common than floogings and burnings. Therefore, the truth of the Spanish Inquisition has not been distorted. What has been rumoured to occur mainly happened at the beginning of the Inquisition's long history. However, it has not been fully distorted as these things did happen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent did Henry V11 enjoy limited success in his domestic policy?"

    fortunes of an effective bankrupt exchequer by introducing efficiently ruthless mechanisms of taxation. Henry looked after money very personally up to 90 per cent of money collected by Henry went to household dept chamber in which he went daily to check the records.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    New species of animals also came to Britain, especially cattle, and pigs. The Edict of Prices by Diocletian refers to the birrus Britannicus, a cloak made from goat's hair, and the tapete Britannicum - a woollen blanket. As these products are referred to as Britannicus (British), this source indicates that

  1. To what extent did the Vikings deserve this bad press? How would you characterise ...

    religion in favour of Christianity, rather than forcing the inhabitants to convert to their lifestyle and religion (P.H.

  2. For and Against The Death Penalty

    By just killing the killer, they learn absolutely nothing. There's no arguing about that. "But what gave the murderer the right to take someone's life?" Can you not reverse that saying and say what gives us the right to execute the murderer? What about the executioner. That poor man or woman has to live with the fact that they

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work