• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent in the period 1906-1914 did the Russian monarchy succeed in removing the primary causes of internal tension and creating a wider base of support?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent in the period 1906-1914 did the Russian monarchy succeed in removing the primary causes of internal tension and creating a wider base of support? Throughout the period 1906-1914, Russia went through many changes. The 1905 revolution, which had threatened autocracy, revealed its tensions in agriculture and industry. The Tsar implemented many changes, which resulted in progress for Russia to some extent, but it also caused peasant discontent amongst other national grievances such as the huge hunger and land problems as well as the policy of Russification. The government attempted to calm the rising tension and to secure Tsar's autocratic rule, but whether it was successful or not is a controversial issue. Could the Tsar's fall in 1917 be attributed to his failure during these years, to address these vital issues? The first example of internal tension in Russia was the shortage of fertile land for the peasants, this lack of 'black soil' led to food shortages, increasing peasant discontent. Russia's agriculture was very behind compared to the western countries, for example England and America, who had experienced their agricultural revolution hundreds of years before Russia. The peasants were angry about the redemption payments resulting from the emancipation of the serfs, these payments meant that the peasants had no money to set up their own farms and prevent their families from dying of starvation. ...read more.


The second factor that created internal tension in Russia was the lack of political and social reforms along with the threat of opposition groups. The Russian people (especially the middle classes-liberals) wanted a zemstva; they wanted more individual freedom and a way to express their grievances to the government. The Tsar had passed these requests off as 'senseless dreams'. But due to the riots and potential revolution in 1905, Tsar knew that if he didn't take some action now in order to reduce the discontent amongst the Russian people then there would be a successful revolution. In October 1905, almost immediately after the 1905 revolution, the Duma was set up with legislative powers, this major concession helped split the opposition and stem the tide of revolution. The Duma might have appeared a positive reform for the people, but it was really only a way to secure the Tsar's autocratic rule, he never had any intentions to increase the people's freedom or to improve their rights, he just wanted to prevent his government being overthrown. Because the first Dumas were radical and challenged Tsar's ruling, he felt threatened and in April 1906 during the calmer atmosphere, he issued the fundamental Principles that limited the powers of the new Duma. With these new principles, the Duma still had the right to question ministers, but it had no real control over them as they were responsible solely to the Tsar; producing a great gulf between the government and the Duma. ...read more.


The final factor that helped cause internal tension was the attempted Russification of the national minorities in Russia. The last years of tsarism saw a growth of aggressive nationalist feelings, both amongst large sections of the population and within government circles as well. The Tsar wanted to try and unite the Russian population in an attempted to improve the growing internal tension. However, Russification resulted in the Russians believing themselves to be superior to the national minorities. The Jews, Finns, Poles, Armenians, Baltic Germans and Georgians all became victims of Russian chauvinism. This aggressive national feeling helped the opposition to the Tsar because they gained support from the national minorities. Helping them become stronger in order to overthrow the Tsar in 1917. In conclusion, although the government did try to set up many reforms in order to stem the increasing internal tension, many of the reforms were not set up to help the people, but to strengthen Tsar's autocratic rule. This meant that the short-term effects were positive because the people believed the Tsar's promises of more freedom and a better way of life. But in the long term the Tsar was not creating a wider base of support for him but for the opposition; paving the way for them to overthrow the government in 1917. Instead of helping to improve internal tension, Tsar increased discontent within the people because he took away the promises he had made, making the people loose all faith in their ruler. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. to what extent was russia stable between 1906 and 1914?

    Economically, Russia was in a lot of danger. Thus they took out a loan from France. In one respect in indicated instability in that they now relied on another country which was risky. However simultaneously it depicted how Russia was trying to overcome the backwardness. Nevertheless; linking back to Stolypins social reforms, it as well had knock on affects on agricultural affairs.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    This situation could be compared with Great Britain, however they had introduced the Defense of the Realm Act which granted the government complete control over the economy and its planning through the Ministry of Munitions. This furthermore hammers down on the point that Tsarism was outdated.

  1. To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the ...

    The existence of a duma, however corrupt the system was at the time, was at least the foundation of democracy. It was the outbreak of World War I, which halted Russia's political, social and economical development. The Optimists believe that had Russia been given more time and a less dire

  2. Was life improving for the Russian people before 1914

    caused a lot of poorer peasants to become even poorer and sell their land, being forced to wander around looking for work. There was another good side in the cities where an industrial boom occurred between 1905 and 1914. The industrial production had increased by a total of 100 per cent.

  1. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Due to the lack of communication around Russia, it made industry backward. The communication was none existent, as there weren't many roads or railways. Factory development was very slow, compared to western countries like us. Agriculture was difficult then too, as the land was very weak and was virtually unproductive for farming.

  2. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Russian monarchy in 1894?

    There were many social and economical developments. Russia began to industrialise and although it remained a predominantly agricultural society, there where hundreds of workers make there way into the much larger cities. There was also growing pressure on the land from an expanding rural population, most subsistence farmers!

  1. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    poor farmer, whocould not afford to send him to colleges so Huey taught himself. Huey won a place at law school, gaining a degree after just 8 months. He was elected to the post of Louisiana Railroad Commissioner. Long saw himself as leader of the poor whites of the Deep South and spoke out against the power of big business.

  2. Russia 1914 To 1917: Coursework : Sources Question

    He talks of how they are being so easily defeated by the Germans, as they themselves do not even get a chance to fire. They had no ammunition and even a severe shortage of guns. "It is difficult to expect selflessness and enthusiasm from men sent into battle without weapons and ordered to take weapons from their dead colleagues."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work