• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources A and B To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B? Explain you answer. Source A is an account by Rudolf Diels written after the Second World War. Rudolf Diels was the head of the Prussian political police. Source B is a confession Van de Lubbe made at his trial in 1933. In Source B Van de Lubbe makes the statement "I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself". He is taking all the blame for setting fire to the Reichstag, he clearly states that contrary to what some believed, he acted alone, without help from any other people. ...read more.

Middle

Diels explains how easy it would have been for Van de Lubbe to set fire to the Reichstag. Diels believed Van de Lubbe could have "rushed through the big corridors with his burning shirt which he had used as a torch to start more fires", this explanation sounds very believable. Diels describes Van de Lubbe as a "madman"; a "madman" may quite happily set fire to the Reichstag. However there are also a lot of ways in which source A is not supported by Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Diels tells us that the night of the fire he interviewed Van de Lubbe and found several "communists pamphlets". This suggests he was a supporter of the communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hitler uses the word "criminals" which is the plural of "criminal" so according to Hitler there was more than one person behind this crime. In conclusion, to a certain extent the account of the police chief (Source A) does agree with Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Reasons why the sources agree include the fact that Van de Lubbe was exhausted and Van de Lubbe been described as a madman. However there are ways Source A is not supported by Source B. There is a lot of information in Source A that doesn't appear in Source B, such as details about exactly how Van de Lubbe may have committed the arson. Although Diels seems to believe Van de Lubbe, the quotes from Goering and Hitler suggest that the communists were responsible for the fire and that there was more than one person involved. History Reichstag Fire Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source I says it must have been the Nazis because Van der Lubbe couldn't have done all that damage as he was handicapped and it wasn't possible for one man to do it all by himself. Source J backs this up, as it is a picture of the damage caused to the building.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Another point to remember is that this account was written after the Second World War, at least 12 years after the Reichstag fire, so his memory of the event might have blurred a bit, although he was the Head of Police and it is quite likely that he might have taken notes.

  1. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    he could create a one party state with nobody left to protest, also Hitler used terror and intimidation to stop anyone from protesting, those who proceed to protest: least that would have happened is they would get arrested, or in extreme cases sent to concentration camps, tortured, beaten, punished, or

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    For some people, the two men with guns give a sense of security suggesting the protection of those in support of Hitler against the Communists.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Therefore, the person that controlled the Reichstag would in effect control Germany. The German people would see the person or group that was responsible for the desecration of the Reichstag as enemies of Germany, therefore showing less respect and possibly refusing to join the party.

  2. Source based work about Van der Lubbe's involvement in the Reichstag fire of February ...

    How far do Sources C and D agree about the events surrounding the Reichstag Fire? Explain your answer. Source C is a British cartoon while Source D is a book written by a Nazi. They both relate to the aftermath of the Reichstag Fire.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    This is one of the reasons why his account might be altered, making it unreliable, in order to keep himself alive. Another reason the judges could use to get him into jail is that he was one of the top Nazis to be prosecuted.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    In conclusion, the evidence shows that source A can't be seen as a reliable source: it was written a lot of years after the event actually happened and is totally one-sided view favoring the Nazis. Source A shows the one-sided view that the Communists where the ones that set on the Reichstag fire.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work