• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources A and B To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B? Explain you answer. Source A is an account by Rudolf Diels written after the Second World War. Rudolf Diels was the head of the Prussian political police. Source B is a confession Van de Lubbe made at his trial in 1933. In Source B Van de Lubbe makes the statement "I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself". He is taking all the blame for setting fire to the Reichstag, he clearly states that contrary to what some believed, he acted alone, without help from any other people. ...read more.

Middle

Diels explains how easy it would have been for Van de Lubbe to set fire to the Reichstag. Diels believed Van de Lubbe could have "rushed through the big corridors with his burning shirt which he had used as a torch to start more fires", this explanation sounds very believable. Diels describes Van de Lubbe as a "madman"; a "madman" may quite happily set fire to the Reichstag. However there are also a lot of ways in which source A is not supported by Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Diels tells us that the night of the fire he interviewed Van de Lubbe and found several "communists pamphlets". This suggests he was a supporter of the communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hitler uses the word "criminals" which is the plural of "criminal" so according to Hitler there was more than one person behind this crime. In conclusion, to a certain extent the account of the police chief (Source A) does agree with Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Reasons why the sources agree include the fact that Van de Lubbe was exhausted and Van de Lubbe been described as a madman. However there are ways Source A is not supported by Source B. There is a lot of information in Source A that doesn't appear in Source B, such as details about exactly how Van de Lubbe may have committed the arson. Although Diels seems to believe Van de Lubbe, the quotes from Goering and Hitler suggest that the communists were responsible for the fire and that there was more than one person involved. History Reichstag Fire Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source I says it must have been the Nazis because Van der Lubbe couldn't have done all that damage as he was handicapped and it wasn't possible for one man to do it all by himself. Source J backs this up, as it is a picture of the damage caused to the building.

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    Propaganda was I believe, Hitler's lethal weapon. Propaganda attempts to force a doctrine on the whole people.

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    Hitler also believed in using fear to influence people's views - men with guns are shown on the front of the book and are positioned in a threatening way to Van der Lubbe which suggests that anyone who goes against the Nazi's will be dealt with.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    This probably means the communist uprising is a threat to the Nazi party and they are the ones who started the fire. The man beside Hitler (Hindenburg) is saying to Hitler that this is the perfect moment for him to become dictator.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    The title of the book; 'Bewaffneter Aufstand' translates into English as 'Armed Uprising', which immediately shows the amount of bias that this book must show in favour of the Nazi party. This title would have been used in order to make the communist party seem more of a threat in the eyes of the German people.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Also, Diels was Head of the Prussian Political Police, and so although he was one of the first people on the scene of the fire, he may have been biased in writing this account to not make it seem as though they had made a wrong decision in convicting Van der Lubbe.

  1. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    The source shows Hindenburg saying to Hitler that "This is a heaven sent opportunity...If you can't be a dictator now, you never will be" which shows that Communists were to blame for the fire and that the Nazis didn't had an idea that it was going to happen.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    How useful are Sources F, G and H in explaining the reactions of Germans to the 'Final Solution' ? (5) Study Sources I and J. In what ways do these sources contradict or support the view that ordinary Germans knew about and supported the "Final Solution"?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work