• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources A and B To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B? Explain you answer. Source A is an account by Rudolf Diels written after the Second World War. Rudolf Diels was the head of the Prussian political police. Source B is a confession Van de Lubbe made at his trial in 1933. In Source B Van de Lubbe makes the statement "I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself". He is taking all the blame for setting fire to the Reichstag, he clearly states that contrary to what some believed, he acted alone, without help from any other people. ...read more.

Middle

Diels explains how easy it would have been for Van de Lubbe to set fire to the Reichstag. Diels believed Van de Lubbe could have "rushed through the big corridors with his burning shirt which he had used as a torch to start more fires", this explanation sounds very believable. Diels describes Van de Lubbe as a "madman"; a "madman" may quite happily set fire to the Reichstag. However there are also a lot of ways in which source A is not supported by Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Diels tells us that the night of the fire he interviewed Van de Lubbe and found several "communists pamphlets". This suggests he was a supporter of the communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hitler uses the word "criminals" which is the plural of "criminal" so according to Hitler there was more than one person behind this crime. In conclusion, to a certain extent the account of the police chief (Source A) does agree with Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Reasons why the sources agree include the fact that Van de Lubbe was exhausted and Van de Lubbe been described as a madman. However there are ways Source A is not supported by Source B. There is a lot of information in Source A that doesn't appear in Source B, such as details about exactly how Van de Lubbe may have committed the arson. Although Diels seems to believe Van de Lubbe, the quotes from Goering and Hitler suggest that the communists were responsible for the fire and that there was more than one person involved. History Reichstag Fire Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The account in Source A was written before the Nuremburg trials, and Diels was probably worried about being convicted of war crimes, so might have changed his account of the event to make him seem like more of a 'good guy', and to try and make others out as being

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    him: 'Even if I had started the fire, I would most certainly not have boasted about it'. Goering was likely to be punished if he confesses, so would most likely lie to avoid this. However, since the other sources don't back up G, we can't say for definite as we don't know; it can only be suggested.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Hitler could have blamed the communist for starting the fire. Then, he could get rid of them easily. The source states that Hindenburg is saying it, but the cartoonist is only using Hindenburg as a character to show what Hitler thinks.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    Source C quite clearly shows that Adolf Hitler and therefore the Nazi party are the group suspected of being in total control of the situation, whereas source D directly illustrates that it was the Communist party. This inference is all done by the people shown and their actions in the pictures.

  1. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    There is a divide of knowledge because different Germans have different access to government propaganda. Support and knowledge of the "Final Solution" is shown much more clearly in this source. The Source claims that everybody had some idea of what was going on.

  2. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    We later see how Hitler takes advantage of events when he re-militarises the Rhineland and this supports the view that Hitler is an opportunist. Source D is the cover of a book released by the Nazis entitled "Armed Uprising". It is written by a Nazi and published shortly after the Reichstag fire.

  1. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    They also had public meetings. On 27th February the Reichstag building had been set on fire. They had found a Dutch communist in the building the police raided, van der lubbe, was arrested and charged with the fire. Hitler then preceded to uses this as evidence that the communists were plotting against his government.

  2. Who was responsible for the Reichstag fire?

    This is agreed by source D which also blames Van der Lubbe, as he is setting fire to the building. Source C also shows Hitler with a Nazi stick and a tunic, as Hindenburg. This shows they were the leaders, like the ancient emperors, the ones that controlled Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work