• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources A and B To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B? Explain you answer. Source A is an account by Rudolf Diels written after the Second World War. Rudolf Diels was the head of the Prussian political police. Source B is a confession Van de Lubbe made at his trial in 1933. In Source B Van de Lubbe makes the statement "I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself". He is taking all the blame for setting fire to the Reichstag, he clearly states that contrary to what some believed, he acted alone, without help from any other people. ...read more.

Middle

Diels explains how easy it would have been for Van de Lubbe to set fire to the Reichstag. Diels believed Van de Lubbe could have "rushed through the big corridors with his burning shirt which he had used as a torch to start more fires", this explanation sounds very believable. Diels describes Van de Lubbe as a "madman"; a "madman" may quite happily set fire to the Reichstag. However there are also a lot of ways in which source A is not supported by Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Diels tells us that the night of the fire he interviewed Van de Lubbe and found several "communists pamphlets". This suggests he was a supporter of the communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hitler uses the word "criminals" which is the plural of "criminal" so according to Hitler there was more than one person behind this crime. In conclusion, to a certain extent the account of the police chief (Source A) does agree with Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Reasons why the sources agree include the fact that Van de Lubbe was exhausted and Van de Lubbe been described as a madman. However there are ways Source A is not supported by Source B. There is a lot of information in Source A that doesn't appear in Source B, such as details about exactly how Van de Lubbe may have committed the arson. Although Diels seems to believe Van de Lubbe, the quotes from Goering and Hitler suggest that the communists were responsible for the fire and that there was more than one person involved. History Reichstag Fire Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    Source I says it must have been the Nazis because Van der Lubbe couldn't have done all that damage as he was handicapped and it wasn't possible for one man to do it all by himself. Source J backs this up, as it is a picture of the damage caused to the building.

  2. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    Another point to remember is that this account was written after the Second World War, at least 12 years after the Reichstag fire, so his memory of the event might have blurred a bit, although he was the Head of Police and it is quite likely that he might have taken notes.

  1. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    This probably means the communist uprising is a threat to the Nazi party and they are the ones who started the fire. The man beside Hitler (Hindenburg) is saying to Hitler that this is the perfect moment for him to become dictator.

  2. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    This would mean that the German people would be less likely to join the communist party, and may seek to join another radical, extremist party. In effect, the Nazi party is using this book as a piece of planned propaganda; to gain the trust, support and votes of the German people in the forthcoming election.

  1. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    was furhrer, so, I believe if it wasn't for the Reichstag fire, Hitler and the Nazis would not have mange to get a majority vote, would not have been able to use the enabling act and Hitler wouldn't of been able to dictate over such a long period of time.

  2. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    This is linked to how in 1936, when the book was published, Britain had freedom of speech so Delmer would most likely be telling the truth therefore making this Source more reliable. However, Source D could also be unreliable. In 1936, many people in Britain thought Hitler and the Nazi

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    On the other hand, the first account could be more reliable as it was written after the trial and the writer had time to reflect on the events, whereas sources written at the time would be written as the events were still happening and may not have included all the facts.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    This strong support is implemented by the figures. "There were 900,000 of them in the SS alone, plus another 1,200,000 involved in the railways". There is over two million people in the SS and railways alone who would have known exactly what was happening in the Death/Concentration Camps.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work