• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1 Study Sources A and B To what extent is the account of the police chief in Source A supported by Van de Lubbes confession is Source B? Explain you answer. Source A is an account by Rudolf Diels written after the Second World War. Rudolf Diels was the head of the Prussian political police. Source B is a confession Van de Lubbe made at his trial in 1933. In Source B Van de Lubbe makes the statement "I set fire to the Reichstag all by myself". He is taking all the blame for setting fire to the Reichstag, he clearly states that contrary to what some believed, he acted alone, without help from any other people. ...read more.

Middle

Diels explains how easy it would have been for Van de Lubbe to set fire to the Reichstag. Diels believed Van de Lubbe could have "rushed through the big corridors with his burning shirt which he had used as a torch to start more fires", this explanation sounds very believable. Diels describes Van de Lubbe as a "madman"; a "madman" may quite happily set fire to the Reichstag. However there are also a lot of ways in which source A is not supported by Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Diels tells us that the night of the fire he interviewed Van de Lubbe and found several "communists pamphlets". This suggests he was a supporter of the communists. ...read more.

Conclusion

Hitler uses the word "criminals" which is the plural of "criminal" so according to Hitler there was more than one person behind this crime. In conclusion, to a certain extent the account of the police chief (Source A) does agree with Van de Lubbe's confession in Source B. Reasons why the sources agree include the fact that Van de Lubbe was exhausted and Van de Lubbe been described as a madman. However there are ways Source A is not supported by Source B. There is a lot of information in Source A that doesn't appear in Source B, such as details about exactly how Van de Lubbe may have committed the arson. Although Diels seems to believe Van de Lubbe, the quotes from Goering and Hitler suggest that the communists were responsible for the fire and that there was more than one person involved. History Reichstag Fire Coursework ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. GCSE History Coursework: Reichstag Fire 1) ...

    The account in Source A was written before the Nuremburg trials, and Diels was probably worried about being convicted of war crimes, so might have changed his account of the event to make him seem like more of a 'good guy', and to try and make others out as being

  2. The Reichstag Fire-Coursework B

    One is that Van der Lubbe was a madman and he set fire to the building all by himself and the Nazis really believed this was the start of a communist uprising. The sources that agree with this are A, B, D, F, and H.

  1. Studies of Sources from the Reichstag Fire - who was responsible?

    him: 'Even if I had started the fire, I would most certainly not have boasted about it'. Goering was likely to be punished if he confesses, so would most likely lie to avoid this. However, since the other sources don't back up G, we can't say for definite as we don't know; it can only be suggested.

  2. IGCSE History Coursework Assignment B - Source Analysis of the Reichstag Fire

    Clearly, Source A is not a very reliable source due to the circumstances Rudolf Diels was in. 3) Study Sources C and D. How far do Sources C and D agree about the events surrounding the Reichstag Fire? Explain your answer.

  1. Modern World History Coursework - Reichstag Sourcework

    The book that source D is extracted from is evidence that the Nazi party tried to take advantage of the situation in any way possible. As previously stated, this blatant propaganda was wrote to remove any existing blame from the Nazi party, and emplace it all on the Communists.

  2. Holocaust - Source related questions.

    Both of the sources, I and J, indicate the view that ordinary Germans knew about and supported the "Final Solution". Source I explains the numbers required to transport and maintain control of the Jews.

  1. History Coursework – the Reichstag Fire

    In my opinion this is an unreliable source as it is written by a Nazi and probably reflects one-sided views. The writer would have supported Hitler's ideas and disliked the communists, so the source has more than likely been written with a bias view.

  2. Reichstag fire coursework assignments

    There was the communist who Hitler viewed as enemies, there was the social democrats that were supported by working class people who may not have liked Hitler's attacks on trade unions. The middle class also supported the democrats and the people's party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work