• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was Balkan Nationalism Responsible for the Outbreak of the First World War?

Extracts from this document...


Pal Shah 07/09/2003 11 C History HL To What Extent Was Balkan Nationalism Responsible for the Outbreak of the First World War? The First World War was a long and tragic war that kidnapped Europe into four years of war with each other. The war left behind it an appalling saga of a raped Europe - ten million dead, millions of widows and orphans, unredeemable destruction to countries and cities, and emotionally tortured millions of minds. The question though, is who caused this atrocious circumstance in Europe? And what pulled in so many countries in a one war? One victim of the blame is Balkan Nationalism - but the real question is: To what extent is this nationalism responsible towards the inauguration of the First World War? In 1914 Europe was a melting pot of tension. The reason for this was the fact that the "Super Powers" of Europe were at the epitome of a power struggle. There were the "Entente" powers of one side, with the United Kingdom (U.K), France, and Russia on one side, and the "Central" powers - Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, on the other side. ...read more.


This would be as the Balkans was a hotspot of European conflict, and actions like these, that could create havoc in a "Super Power" (Austria-Hungary), would be absolutely unacceptable. It is reasonable on the side of the Austria-Hungarians' to be concerned by such terrorist groups, that want to fuel nationalism in a empire that has so many ethnic minorities being ruled over by a one Emperor. This - the "Black Hand" and their gang - were one of the prime reasons of why Balkan nationalism was responsible for the outbreak of World War I. Another reason why Serbian Nationalism was responsible for the outbreak of World War I, would be due to the fact that not only are groups like the "Black Hand" promoting nationalism (and Serbian at that), but by doing so, they are encouraging the Serbs in Austria Hungary to revolt. The aim of this would be that by revolting against Austria-Hungary, the Serbians would join Serbia, to form a "Greater" Serbia - which was the aim of the "Black Hand." ...read more.


Likewise, there is also the reality that Serbia could have accepted the terms of the Ultimatum, and avoided conflict with a "Super Power," which was bound to get all of Europe into war. Serbia in all likelihood knew that them rejecting the Ultimatum would lead to a major war in Europe - but decided to put their nationalism before logic. Serbia decided that it should show its people how patriotic the Government can be, and therefore did not give into to a power like Austria-Hungary. Thereby, due to all the reasons mentioned above, one can see that Austria-Hungary saw Serbia as a growing threat to their dominancy in the Balkans, as Serbia too was a growing and an influential power in that region. This tension is one of the chief reasons for the outbreak for war. This could have been avoided if Serbia would have simply understood that their ambitious expansion plans at the cost of other nations would simply not work, and that an influence-in-the-region race would not work with a "Super Power" such as Austria-Hungary. One can conclude, therefore, that Serbian Nationalism was to blame for the outbreak of the First World War. 1 Source: http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWblackhand.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was Germany responsible for causing the First World War?

    (Matel, 1984:72-76). However, it could be argued that the tension was no more than in previous years.

  2. To What Extent Were Germany To Blame For The Outbreak Of World War One?

    The final example of German foreign policy was that created by General Schlieffen. All of the other factors leading to the outbreak of war so far have been in creating the conditions for war whereas the Schlieffen plan shows German's want of war.

  1. To what extent was the Alliance System responsible for the outbreak of the First ...

    Besides, German civilians and military leaders wanted to expand their territory that would them allow them to compete successfully with Britain and the United States. In addition, there was also nationalism in Russia, France and Britain. Russia's main ambition was for territory, she wanted to expand eastwards and westwards.

  2. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    Also, the provisional governments failed to take effective action, lacked resources and experience meaning that none of the states which gained independence- Sicily, Lombardy and Venetia were able to retain it. This was similar to what had happened in the French Revolution at the end of the eighteenth century where many of the rulers had expected to be defeated.

  1. Who Was Responsible for The Tragedy at Gallipoli in 1915?

    He failed. Further blame can be placed on Winston Churchill. He had a brilliant scheme, which was to capture Constantinople. This idea was possible, and desirable to Churchill, and as a result, he leapt to the conclusion that successful accomplishment must follow.


    army through the Papal States and defeated the Papal army on its way. Plebiscites ( voting by people on an important issue) were held and the wish for a united Italy was great. Garibaldi then finally handed over all his conquests to Victor Emmanuel.

  1. "The outbreak of the First World War in 1914 grew out of a short ...

    calls of democracy and socialism by uniting them in a single cause. All it accomplished in the end though, was to further alarm the other European powers, and again created a heightened sense of tension between them. Thus another long-standing that lead to war was the Kaiser's policy for Weltpolitik.

  2. To what extent was Europe, 1890, an area of growing tension sowing the seeds ...

    However, Russia did not retreat. Being a 'landlocked' state, she wanted to acquire warm water ports in the Balkans (e.g. Constantinople). Moreover, as most of the Balkan peoples were of the Slav race, Russia could claim to be the protector of her brother races in her expansion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work