• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th cavalry?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Jonathan Teece To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th cavalry? In order to answer the question, to what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat of the 7th cavalry; two different viewpoints need to be taken into consideration. On one hand Custer was against a great leader, on the other hand, he could be accused of making somewhat suicidal charges. In this essay, I will take both of these viewpoints into consideration. Firstly, I will look at the reasons why Custer may not be to blame for the defeat of the 7th Cavalry in 1876. ...read more.

Middle

Insufficient information about this could also be to blame for the defeat. Thirdly, the other two army forces failed to get to the battle, Crook's forces had been defeated, and had retreated, while Gibbon was marching on foot. This shows that lack of resources could have been to blame for the defeat. I will now look at the possible reasons for Custer to be to blame for the defeat. Custer had orders to wait for Gibbon's force before attacking, but instead force-marched his men in order to attack on his own, because he wanted all of the glory. ...read more.

Conclusion

Custer did not scout the ground properly, and had to avoid some quicksand he had not known about. Custer split his men and failed to support Reno and Benteen when their first attack failed. This was because he had changed his plans (without telling them) to circle around the Indians. Overall, after taking all of the points into consideration, I think that Custer was to blame for the defeat of the 7th cavalry. I think this mainly because Custer failed to take the scouts reports into consideration and because he didn't wait for support from Gibbon's force. I believe that if Custer had waited for Gibbons force then the battle of Little Big Horn could have been a lot different. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was Custer to blame for the defeat at the battle of ...

    3 star(s)

    Custer had an interesting personality. He could kill without a single twinge, but was able to shed tears at a play in the theatre. After the civil war he became too confident. He was vain, respected by men and especially the women.

  2. To what extent wasBritain Romanised

    In other Roman provinces, such as Gaul (France) and Hispania (Spain), the Latin language was spread so well, that it eventually provided a direct basis for the grammar and vocabulary of the Romance group of languages, which include French, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese.

  1. Free essay

    Custers responsibilty for teh defeat at Little Bighorn

    Identify the strengths and weaknesses of General Sheridan's plan General Sheridan's plan was to have three columns starting at different points, and each meeting the Indian camp from all directions in order to surround them and take them out. The plans strength was that, I theory, if all three columns arrived at the camp at the same time.

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    that included killing many Indians, but only losing 6 of his own men. These victories had inflated Custer's ego even more and given him an obscene amount of confidence. This confidence was exactly what made Custer feel so sure that he would win at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.

  1. To what extent was Ho Chi Minh(TM)s leadership of North Vietnam the reason why ...

    This demonstrates how the lack of strength in South Vietnam, both politically and socially was a factor as to why US could not progress in South Vietnam and therefore contributed to the eventual withdrawal. Sanders highlight's how the corruption and miss- management of South Vietnams government naturally filtered through its

  2. Was Custer to blame for the defeat at the Battle of Little Bighorn

    This could have been their worst downfall. There was no scouting ahead from the superiors, nor a great deal from Crook who was overcome by Indians at Rosebud Creek (after not having liaised very much with the superiors in question).

  1. Who was the real Custer, and to what extent was he to blame for ...

    This quote is a negative aspect of Custer but he is trying to justify it by suggesting that he rubs against the hair but only because he can't do otherwise. So the wrong decisions in his life maybe explained by this long-term cause of not being able to find other

  2. The Battle of the Little Bighorn.

    exchanged and they were bot willing to give up the Birthplace of their people up easily. In December 1875 all Sioux were ordered to return to their disturbed reservation. The Indian numbers made this hard. There were reported to be 7000 Indians, amongst them Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work