• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Hitler to blame for WW2?

Extracts from this document...


TO WHAT EXTENT WAS HITLER TO BLAME FOR WORLD WAR II? In my opinion, Hitler was ultimately to blame for the outbreak of World War II because he was committed to conquering Europe and his aggression would only be permitted to go so far by other nations. Nevertheless, Hitler's actions were motivated and facilitated by the decisions of other nations and organisations in accordance with a number of themes which underpinned international relations from 1919 to 1939. Economics was the fundamental force driving the foreign policy of European nations from 1919 because they wanted their economies to recover from the First World War so that they could pay off loans which they had taken from America to fund their war efforts. I know that France in particular was heavily indebted and had been obliterated in the war, so it could not afford to pay off its loans or repair the damage. This predicament, along with strong anti-German public sentiment in France after the war, propelled France to demand 132 billion German Marks in war reparations from Germany in the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. This amount was unreasonably high, but France was self-interested so it cared nothing for the prosperity of Germany. However, the Treaty of Versailles was one of the initial causes of World War II because it sparked outrage among ordinary Germans which fed bitterness ...read more.


However, I know that Chamberlain was fully aware of Hitler's unrelenting ambition and his real aim was to buy time so that Britain could rearm in preparation for war with Hitler. Imperialism was another major theme in the lead up to World War II. In 1930, Britain and France both controlled large empires and were preoccupied with protecting and maintaining them, so other countries were unopposed when they began forming their own empires. For instance, in 1931, Japan invaded the Chinese province of Manchuria. The motivations for this expansionism were actually economic; Japan sought to gain control of Manchuria's resources (such as coal, iron and timber) in order to increase the competitiveness of its economy so that it could afford to export goods to America despite the tariffs that the USA had put in place to protect domestic industry during the Great Depression. The League of Nations condemned Japan's imperialism, but neither Britain nor France were prepared to risk their navies in a war on the other side of the world that would leave their colonies exposed and Japan was too important to Britain as a trading partner, so the League could not force Japan to withdraw. Similarly, in 1935, Italy invaded Abyssinia and the League was once again prevented from discouraging aggression by Britain and France because they were self-interested and wanted Italy as an ally against Hitler who was becoming increasingly powerful. ...read more.


However, this was a biased alliance because it was much less important to Hitler than Stalin, so when it was no longer beneficial to Hitler he broke it, invading the USSR in 1941. The alliance between Britain and France is also interesting because although it was created to counter any threat posed by Germany through collective security, it was undermined by Britain's policy of appeasement. France was less sympathetic towards Germany than Britain and it did not condone Hitler's demands for more territory. However, it was unwilling to use force without the support of Britain which it lacked because of appeasement and it was also unwilling to go to war in 1936 to prevent Hitler remilitarising the Rhineland as there were upcoming elections in France. This encouraged Hitler to invade Czechoslovakia and Poland because he knew that France would not intervene. In conclusion, economics and militarism had the greatest influence on Hitler's capabilities as he would not have come to power without the desperation caused by the Great Depression, nor would he have been unable to conquer any of Europe without powerful armed forces. But in the end, Hitler was overall to blame because he had no limit to his ambition - the themes of economics and militarism were only the most important because they determined the extent to which Hitler was able to fulfil his ambition. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Was Hitler the cause of WW2? A.J.P Taylor wrote the controversial The origins ...

    There was far too many who don't feel the necessity for stopping "war lords" who want to take over their neighbours. The USA has been a force for good around the world, stopping the aggressive attacks of people who want to take over their neighbours.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    In which Woodrow proposed that there might be a United Nations where problems within the countries could be sorted without resorting to war. In the fourteen points it said nothing about punishing Germany for starting the war or loosing it.

  1. To what extent was appeasement the correct policy during the 1930s?

    Britain and France eventually took, in hindsight, what is believed to be the easy way out and appeased Hitler with his decision after signing the Munich Agreement in September 1938.

  2. Japanese Invade Manchuria

    The other Treaty was The Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928. Its terms were: * The parties... condemn war as a means of solving international disputes and reject it as an instrument of policy. * The settlement or solution of all disputes...

  1. Great Depression

    In Japan the economy was in collapse and this led to take control of Manchuria as the leaders wanted to try to distract their people�s attention away from eceonomic problems at home. All this consewuences, made the Leagues position to weaken considerably.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    With "Weltpolitik", Germany advanced ambitions for recognition as a world power, with colonies and a large navy. 2. The "New Course" in German diplomacy reflected the growth in the power of a nation that had consolidated its position on the continent and was seeking new outlets for its nationalist and

  1. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    Germany itself had a small empire, with land in Russia and therefore held some influence in that area until the end of World War one, when the Treaty of Versailles demanded that the land be returned to Russia, diminishing to a great extent Germany's empire, and greatly reducing her power.

  2. History Revision notes - International Relations: Why did WW2 break out? 1929-1939

    The Manchurian Crisis (1931) Effects of Great Depression on Japan - Japan suffered more than most countries in the Great Depression. It was a small country with no raw materials, except silk, and its economic well-being depended upon exporting silk abroad, to pay for imports of essential resources such as coal, rubber and iron for its industries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work