• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state? Goebbels once said "the aim of the Nationalist Socialist Revolution must be a totalitarian state, which will permeate all aspects of public life" In reality to put this into practise was a lot more difficult. From the outside, people assume that the Nazis had brainwashed every German citizen during their reign. By booking more closely, through Germanys archives we can see a better picture of what Germany was really like. Totalitarian states must have a number of things, primarily being one main leader, government control of all aspects of life and create committed members of state. In 'Weimar and Nazi Germany' by John Hite and Chris Hinton, they give us the essential features of a totalitarian regime. In order to see how well the Nazis achieved this, it is better to go through the key points one by one. " A one party state, led by one powerful leader, the centre of a personality cult" Hitler achieved a one party state in July 1933 by banning other opposition parties. However these opposition parties had underground parties: the SDP had the Berlin Red Patrol and the KDP had the red orchestra, so Hitler didn't completely get rid of his opposition. A major area of debate about the 3rd Reich concerns the role played by Hitler. There are two schools of thought. ...read more.


" A government monopoly of the media and culture used for propaganda." Undoubtedly, propaganda was vitally important to the Nazis and the German people were constantly subjected to it, whether it was during Hitler's rise to the top or when he was trying to indoctrinate the people of Germany. The propaganda was very organised, spreading the Nazis views and policies, and creating the 'ideal' that was the Volksgemeinschaft. However, looking back at that time, it is hard to establish whether or not the propaganda was entirely successful. This is because Hitler wanted propaganda to be everywhere, and he took away the basic rights that the people had, so there are no opinion polls available, and no neutral newspapers. Historians cannot fully justify that the mass of propaganda produced at that time actually worked. Indeed many people seemed to support the Nazi regime (or perhaps had no other alternative) but how many were actually serious hard-core Nazis? The role of the propaganda in Hitler's view was that it must be the link between the government and the people, thus, it was touching on ideals and beliefs that were already popular with them. So, it concentrated on the media, arts and social propaganda such as the radio, buildings for the thousand years Reich, and the banning of degenerate art. There was a limited impact of propaganda. It was hugely successful when it was touching on hugely popular beliefs such as the undoing of the Treaty of Versailles, or the Foreign policy. ...read more.


From 1936 the eagle and swastika had to worn on judges' robes. So the existing law was debased, and authorities outside the law took arbitrary actions. " Government control of the economy" The state intervened in the economy to end unemployment and basic economic issues. It didn't get rid of the government department and so created a sideline department. The control that the Nazi party had led to popular policies and successes such as the drop in unemployment. There was disagreement in who was in control of the economy between Schacht the founder of 'the new plan' and Goering's 'four year plan' which shows that the control was not centralised in one department. By looking at these points we can see that the Nazi party were successful in controlling certain areas but were not successful in everything as Historian Stephen Lee says: " In theory the Nazi state was totalitarian in that it eradicated institutions allowing of the formal expression of dissent and opposition and then proceeded to use the SS and Gestapo to pick off individual acts of anti Nazi behaviour. By and large this combined process was successful. Yet, the fact that oppositions did develop in such a variety of forms indicates that totalitarianism was only party successful" I believe this statement is true, as the evidence clearly shows. Hitler was not the tyrant that everyone believed him to be, especially when there is opposition to his party and their ideals. It shows that even with all the propaganda, and control of institutions, people cannot easily be dictated. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Was Hitler a Totalitarian Dictator?

    3 star(s)

    It is clear evidence that Hitler was prepared to be absolutely ruthless in his drive to set up a total dictatorship. Hitler had many ways of dealing with the opposition one of these ways was the concentration camps. Concentration camps were prisons set up for enemies of Hitler.

  2. To What Extent Was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian State 1933-1939?

    Hitler's rise and consolidation of power was due mainly to four reasons. They were, the economic problems to the downfall of the German democracy, the failure of the Weimar republic, the rise of the nazi party and the lack of opposition. Each aspect equally led to Hitler's rise to power.

  1. How did Hitler turn Germany into a totalitarian state?

    One of Hitler's main activities of persuasion was his youth movement and the changes he made to the education. German schools were aimed towards educating every child to be a good Nazi.

  2. The Nazi Police State

    Alongside this, eugenics was taught in Nazi schools and universities, and scientists were ordered to promote 'racial studies' in all sciences. Anyone who protested against it in the belief that it hindered scientific investigation was forced to stop practicing. The purpose of all this was to brain-wash the youth of

  1. To what extent was Hitler a totalitarian dictator?

    The Riechstag became a rubber stamp parliament; meaning laws could still be passed with opposition. This brought Hitler into totalitarian status by destroying the democratic government; all other parties either dissolved or were destroyed. This all was induced from the Enabling Act.

  2. To what extent did the Nazis achieve an economic miracle in Germany between 1933-1939?

    -The downturn of the weak domestic economy between 1929 and 1931 is more important than 1933. Textbooks have stated that at the height of the depression the number of registered unemployed reached six million, but recent research has shown the figure to be much closer to eight and a half million.

  1. Did Nazi rule in Germany result in a social revolution.

    The Nazis played upon the German peoples already dislike of Gypsies. They managed to murder 16,000 out of 20,000 gypsies in Germany, the majority. (Richard Overy, p92). After 'The Night of the Long Knifes' the death penalty was now justified for homosexuals and government-sponsored murder became an acceptable practice for eradicating homosexuality (Landman, 1990s).

  2. Daily Life in Nazi Germany:

    Although legal reforms put an end to discrimination on religious grounds, hostility, based on racism, grew. Racist theories that had been formulated during the preceding decades provided the basis for a new grouping of anti-Semitic political parties after the Franco-Prussian War and the economic crash of 1873.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work