• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TO WHAT EXTENT WAS NICHOLAS II THE CASUE OF THE 1905 REVOLUTION

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TO WHAT EXTENT WAS NICHOLAS II THE CAUSE OF THE 1905 REVOLUTION? Nicholas II faced many problems at the beginning of his reign which were magnified because of his incomplete training in becoming tsar. The main problems facing him were that the zemstvas wanted more power and a growth in opposition. He rejected the first "problem" and as such, a number of political parties, both moderate and violent came into being. The 1905 revolution had two catalysts which were Bloody Sunday and the fact that Nicholas II only offered the liberals a consultative assembly when they wanted a legislative assembly as well. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas' ultraconservative nationalism led him to oppose all progressive reform and to impose 'Russification' on ethnic minorities, instilling powerful discontent throughout the Empire. His disastrous war with Japan in 1904-1905 weakened the regime's authority, and during 1905 Russia was overrun with immense waves of unrest. Unable to control the growing chaos, Nicholas was finally forced to issue the October Manifesto, creating a legislative Duma and even then it took a policy of brutal repression to slowly restore order and gradually Nicholas II and his government regained control of the situation. Despite this, the majority of problems resulted from the actions of previous tsars. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 1905 revolution can be defined by the October General Strike. This can be proved to be the labour of the workers and once again points to the fact that Alexander III created a cause of the 1905 revolution (industrialisation). The main cause of the revolution was the Russo-Japanese war. Nicholas II saw the possibility of a successful war to divert the discontent of the Russians from his rule. The Russo-Japanese War was a disaster and as such the government was totally discredited in the eyes of the Russian people. The war started the flurry of discontent and as such, it can be argued that Nicholas II was the main cause of the 1905 revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Nicholas chose to ignore this in his reaction. 'That fat fellow Rodzianko has again written me all kinds of nonsense which I shan't even bother to answer.' This ignorance led to the revolution finally taking place. If Tsar Nicholas had taken notice of Rodzianko and had taken appropriate measures to

  2. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Some of the people in this class took pity on the lower classes and thought the conditions were disgraceful. However they were unhappy, as they had no political power i.e. couldn't vote. The richest and most powerful Russians in 1900 were the people of the upper class (they took up 2% of the population).

  1. To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

    News of this massacre spread within Russia and the public were shocked. This gave the public a common programme and Russia held its first ever general strike. A week later a full scale revolution was in place. This is a very important factor as it sparks the revolution and gives the people a reason to revolt against the government.

  2. Tsar Nicholas II

    This was very unfair on the peasants but since the tsar could not help everybody since they all wanted different things the leadership failed and it wasn't the size that affected this matter. Since there were many different qualities of life of the people in Russia, not everybody had the

  1. "Alexander III bequeathed Nicholas II a revolution" (Trotsky) Discuss

    the realization of this ideal by forcing the Russian language and Russian schools on his German, Polish and other non-Russian subjects by fostering Eastern Orthodoxy at the expense of other confessions, by persecuting the Jews and by destroying the trace of German, Polish and Swedish institutions.

  2. What Were The Biggest Challenges Facing Nicholas II On His Accession To The Throne, ...

    could be farmed on during the summer as in the winter the weather was too extreme. Also communication and transportation was difficult, as Russia had not met an industrial revolution yet, this affects farming because transportation of goods, exports and imports would be difficult, and cost more money to travel them.

  1. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    Therefore I think that these sources could be used by a historian to study Bloody Sunday and provide them with some very useful pieces of information. f) How far do these sources support the view that 'Bloody Sunday' was caused by poor living and working conditions in St.Petersburg?

  2. To what extent is the title “Tsar Liberator” a true description of Alex II?

    It was believed that serfdom prevented the growth of Russian industry, interfering with the free flow of labour and restricting enterprise. It also prevented bringing in modern methods or agriculture, which left Russia un-wealthy and not developing like the rest of Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work