• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

TO WHAT EXTENT WAS NICHOLAS II THE CASUE OF THE 1905 REVOLUTION

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

TO WHAT EXTENT WAS NICHOLAS II THE CAUSE OF THE 1905 REVOLUTION? Nicholas II faced many problems at the beginning of his reign which were magnified because of his incomplete training in becoming tsar. The main problems facing him were that the zemstvas wanted more power and a growth in opposition. He rejected the first "problem" and as such, a number of political parties, both moderate and violent came into being. The 1905 revolution had two catalysts which were Bloody Sunday and the fact that Nicholas II only offered the liberals a consultative assembly when they wanted a legislative assembly as well. ...read more.

Middle

Nicholas' ultraconservative nationalism led him to oppose all progressive reform and to impose 'Russification' on ethnic minorities, instilling powerful discontent throughout the Empire. His disastrous war with Japan in 1904-1905 weakened the regime's authority, and during 1905 Russia was overrun with immense waves of unrest. Unable to control the growing chaos, Nicholas was finally forced to issue the October Manifesto, creating a legislative Duma and even then it took a policy of brutal repression to slowly restore order and gradually Nicholas II and his government regained control of the situation. Despite this, the majority of problems resulted from the actions of previous tsars. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 1905 revolution can be defined by the October General Strike. This can be proved to be the labour of the workers and once again points to the fact that Alexander III created a cause of the 1905 revolution (industrialisation). The main cause of the revolution was the Russo-Japanese war. Nicholas II saw the possibility of a successful war to divert the discontent of the Russians from his rule. The Russo-Japanese War was a disaster and as such the government was totally discredited in the eyes of the Russian people. The war started the flurry of discontent and as such, it can be argued that Nicholas II was the main cause of the 1905 revolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    The soldiers are holding banners, which are said to read 'Down with the Tsar. Long live the Republic'. Both these views support the second interpretation that revolution was inevitable in Russia by 1917. Source G is a summary of a memorandum written in February 1914 by P.N Durnovo, who was an extreme right-wing member of Nicholas II's State Council.

  2. What Were The Causes Of The 1905 Russian Revolution? How Successful Was This Revolution?

    Some of the people in this class took pity on the lower classes and thought the conditions were disgraceful. However they were unhappy, as they had no political power i.e. couldn't vote. The richest and most powerful Russians in 1900 were the people of the upper class (they took up 2% of the population).

  1. The blance sheet for russia.

    In June 1921 he said: 'No country has been so devastated as ours'." (Ibid., p. 214, emphasis in original.) War, hunger and disease wiped out millions. In 1920 cases of cannibalism were reported. Overall, the small working class was reduced to 43 per cent of its former size.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    It is enough to say that the Constitution does not provide for it. We are of the opinion that such an attempt to fix the hours and wages of workers was not a lawful use of government power." Franklin D.

  1. Tsar Nicholas II

    This made Russia very difficult to govern since the different groups wanted different things from their leader. The peasants simply wanted more land and money, the urban workers wanted better working conditions and hours of work to make their lives more bearable and Nobility simply wanted more of everything.

  2. To what extent were economic problems the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

    I think this was very significant as the public had all the right to be very angry and it gave them all a common argument against the tsar as it was a national crisis. The Russio-Japenese war broke out in 1904.

  1. "Alexander III bequeathed Nicholas II a revolution" (Trotsky) Discuss

    the realization of this ideal by forcing the Russian language and Russian schools on his German, Polish and other non-Russian subjects by fostering Eastern Orthodoxy at the expense of other confessions, by persecuting the Jews and by destroying the trace of German, Polish and Swedish institutions.

  2. What Were The Biggest Challenges Facing Nicholas II On His Accession To The Throne, ...

    greater prosperity and also to less civil unrest if more peasants have money and jobs. Only 4 months of the Russian year could be farmed on and the weather was usually extreme, very hot or very cold. This meant that farming suffered, as only a small period of the year

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work