• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin personally responsible for the Purges of the USSR in the 1930's?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was Stalin personally responsible for the Purges of the USSR in the 1930's? The person responsible for the purges in Soviet Russia in 1930 was seen to be Stalin as his signature was on the documents which authorised the mass killings. Also historians do believe that the purges were Stalin's method to eradicate political threats from the party. Although other historians argue that Stalin did not know what was happening and it was actually the Kaganovitch, a Politburo Party Control Commission in Moscow, who administrated the second chistka, purges, in 1933. One of the most important pieces of evidence that suggests that Stalin was personally responsible was indeed the fact that his signatures were on the documents authorising the killings, which I have already mentioned, but also he was constantly kept informed of the developments within the USSR. ...read more.


In addition another, not as important, but certainly valid reason which indicates that Stalin was personally responsible is due to him being seen at the public 'show trails'. In particularly Bukharin's where he was hiding behind a certain, which indicates that he was trying to influence the verdict on Bukharin. Although revisionist historians claim that the 'show trails', arrests and chistki are unconnected events, therefore it is unfair to blame Stalin for the purges on the basis that he was present at 'show trails' and trying to influence there outcomes. Other key points that indicate that Stalin was not responsible for the purges are that Lenin actually initiated purges by using ruthless treatments against opponents in the 1920's, such as very drastic treatments of 'The Whites' in the civil war which included shooting the Romanov family, and setting up the first labour camps. ...read more.


As a result all three services (navel, air, and army) were severely undermanned and staffed by inexperienced or incompetent replacements. This was very dangerous action to undertake as the onset of war was looming. Therefore if the purges would lead to such drastic consequences why would he initiate it? In conclusion despite there being no conclusive evidence whether or not Stalin was personally responsible for the purges during the 1930's, and despite Stalin authorising the mass killings and benefiting directly due to all his opposition being executed or removed from within the party, which meant that Stalin was free to do what he desired, Lenin did actually instigate the purges which Stalin only continued on doing. Also it is now believed that Ezhov, who was the head of the NKVD between 1936-38, was responsible for the 'Great Purges' and historians have renamed this period the 'Ezhovchiria'. Therefore I believe that Stalin was not responsible for the purges. Rachael Hewitt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    By 1936 the central leadership of the Party was determined to destroy the power of these local Party secretaries. The inability of Stalin and his allies to control and govern the Party was a major weakness which encouraged radical solutions to remedy the problem of regional leaders who were ignoring its commands.

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    Moreover, the Five Year Plans were based on the same methods and were implemented in an identical brutal fashion to the purges, which led to the death of millions of labourers. This therefore brings me to a conclusion that Stalin had experience with this form of "cleansing" which enhances my

  1. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930s a ...

    Many framers destroyed their crops, tools and farm buildings, and killed their animals rather than hand over their grain and animals. Stalin still sent armed squads to collect grain from the peasants. This meant that too much food was being exported; which was a punishment for not cooperating.

  2. USSR in the 1930's.

    was necessary for the defence of.. the interests of the victory of socialism and communism...In this lies the whole tragedy'. This quote shows how Khrushchev believes that the use of terror and executions was a tragedy and not necessarily needed for the survival of the USSR but that Stalin believed it was the only way.

  1. The Party and the Purges

    Ancient minor grievances amounted to crimes, like a distant relative having left Russia in 1918. Finally Stalin had sixteen former "left-oppositionists" including Zinoviev and Kamenev, tried for the murder of Kirov, and of conspiring to murder Stalin, in public, the famous "Show Trials".

  2. To What Extent can Individuals be Credited with being Responsible for Revolutions?

    Peasants demanded land reforms but these demands fell on deaf ears. Agricultural techniques were primitive compared to western methods, this meant that food production was not at its optimum level. Other factors like poor weather conditions in winter months brought food production to a virtual stand still.

  1. Stalin and Purges

    He was than imprisoned during the First World War and was only able to return to Petrograd from Serbia in February 1917. By then he was one of the leaders of the party and he was well-known in organising the Bolsheviks during 1917.

  2. What Happened To The Romanov Family?

    On the other hand, Medvedev could have been tortured by the Whites, because they wanted to know what happened when they were shot. This means that the source could be unreliable. It could also be unreliable because it does not agree to what his wife says in source E.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work