• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was Stalin personally responsible for the Purges of the USSR in the 1930's?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was Stalin personally responsible for the Purges of the USSR in the 1930's? The person responsible for the purges in Soviet Russia in 1930 was seen to be Stalin as his signature was on the documents which authorised the mass killings. Also historians do believe that the purges were Stalin's method to eradicate political threats from the party. Although other historians argue that Stalin did not know what was happening and it was actually the Kaganovitch, a Politburo Party Control Commission in Moscow, who administrated the second chistka, purges, in 1933. One of the most important pieces of evidence that suggests that Stalin was personally responsible was indeed the fact that his signatures were on the documents authorising the killings, which I have already mentioned, but also he was constantly kept informed of the developments within the USSR. ...read more.

Middle

In addition another, not as important, but certainly valid reason which indicates that Stalin was personally responsible is due to him being seen at the public 'show trails'. In particularly Bukharin's where he was hiding behind a certain, which indicates that he was trying to influence the verdict on Bukharin. Although revisionist historians claim that the 'show trails', arrests and chistki are unconnected events, therefore it is unfair to blame Stalin for the purges on the basis that he was present at 'show trails' and trying to influence there outcomes. Other key points that indicate that Stalin was not responsible for the purges are that Lenin actually initiated purges by using ruthless treatments against opponents in the 1920's, such as very drastic treatments of 'The Whites' in the civil war which included shooting the Romanov family, and setting up the first labour camps. ...read more.

Conclusion

As a result all three services (navel, air, and army) were severely undermanned and staffed by inexperienced or incompetent replacements. This was very dangerous action to undertake as the onset of war was looming. Therefore if the purges would lead to such drastic consequences why would he initiate it? In conclusion despite there being no conclusive evidence whether or not Stalin was personally responsible for the purges during the 1930's, and despite Stalin authorising the mass killings and benefiting directly due to all his opposition being executed or removed from within the party, which meant that Stalin was free to do what he desired, Lenin did actually instigate the purges which Stalin only continued on doing. Also it is now believed that Ezhov, who was the head of the NKVD between 1936-38, was responsible for the 'Great Purges' and historians have renamed this period the 'Ezhovchiria'. Therefore I believe that Stalin was not responsible for the purges. Rachael Hewitt ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why Did Stalin Use Terror and Purges in Such a Comprehensive Way during the ...

    By 1936 the central leadership of the Party was determined to destroy the power of these local Party secretaries. The inability of Stalin and his allies to control and govern the Party was a major weakness which encouraged radical solutions to remedy the problem of regional leaders who were ignoring its commands.

  2. "Stalin was personally responsible for the Purges in Russia in the 1930s". Agree or ...

    Moreover, the Five Year Plans were based on the same methods and were implemented in an identical brutal fashion to the purges, which led to the death of millions of labourers. This therefore brings me to a conclusion that Stalin had experience with this form of "cleansing" which enhances my

  1. How did Stalin transform the economy of the USSR in the 1930s?

    * It was important that the USSR had a strong industrial base to produce the goods its people needed. This would make it self-sufficient and more independent in the world. III. To Increase Grain Supplies: * Stalin wanted to end the dependence of the economy on a backward agricultural system.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    (Quoted by M. Liebman, Leninism under Lenin, p. 346.) "In July 1918, Lenin said: 'The people are like a man who has been thrashed within an inch of his life.' In January 1919: 'The hungry masses are exhausted, and [their} exhaustion is sometimes more than human strength can endure.'

  1. USSR in the 1930's.

    Source K states that Stalin needed to use terror to keep the people 'obedient' and more importantly to make them 'believe in him'. It seems that in the end the Source believes he was a 'ruthless politician' who was corrupted by power.

  2. To what extent were the sufferings of the Soviet people in the 1930s a ...

    All the grain produced was sold to the government at a fixed low price. Although there was a lot of propaganda to gain support for collectivisation, many of the 100 million peasants opposed to this plan, so Stalin realised that he had to deal with them.

  1. The Party and the Purges

    Ancient minor grievances amounted to crimes, like a distant relative having left Russia in 1918. Finally Stalin had sixteen former "left-oppositionists" including Zinoviev and Kamenev, tried for the murder of Kirov, and of conspiring to murder Stalin, in public, the famous "Show Trials".

  2. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    He is the focus of every poster, newspaper, picture, video, film etc. The evidence of the source calified as biased is the fact of being Stalin who wrote it. The purpose of it had been showing Russia what kind of good man he is and how much did he look after his comrades.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work