• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was the League of Nations a success? The League of Nations faced many problems, but was it a success? In my opinion the League was equally successful as it was a failure but because the failures were a lot more famous the successes were not as well noticed. I am going to show the successes and the failures of the league to try and show that my point is correct. The league's main successes came not from fighting but from helping to resolve the problems caused by the violence of the First World War. After the First World War many people were left homeless and the League helped to solve the large refugee problem. In the Treaty of Versailles, German and Turkish colonies were put under temporary control of Britain and France and were kept a close eye on by the mandates Commission until it was felt that these countries were able to govern themselves. Another success of the league was the International labour organisation, which was founded in 1919 and was linked to the work of the League of Nations. However non-league countries could also join. It helped to encourage the formation of trade unions and to improve working conditions, pensions and minimum wage schemes across the world. ...read more.

Middle

and also economic sanctions would be useless without the cooperation of the USA who was Japan's main trading partner. Another thing that could have been done would be to impose military sanctions but neither France nor Britain were willing to risk their armies and navies and even if they did it would require of army of the size of the USSR or the USA and neither of these was a member of the league. The only thing left the league could do would be to try and persuade the countries to reach a compromise. Lord Lytton of Britain was sent to investigate and a year later he produced a report to try and satisfy both sides. It suggested that the Japanese would leave Manchuria but that it would carry on being a semi-independent state free from Chinese rule. In response the Japanese resigned from the league and continued to occupy the Chinese providence known as Jehol. The Manchurian crisis had knock on affects for the league, because now even it's strongest supporters seemed doubtful about whether or not it could maintain world peace. The next big failure for the league came in 1935 in the Abyssinia crisis. In the 1930's almost all of Africa was part of some European empire and only two states remained independent, one of these states was Abyssinia. ...read more.

Conclusion

In December 1932 an agreement for equality was agreed and in January Germany announced that they were coming back. In February Hitler became chancellor and immediately began secretly re-arming. In May Hitler promised not to disarm if in 5 years all other nations destroyed their arms. In June, Britain produced a disarmament plan and in October Germany withdrew from the disarmament conference and later from the league altogether. Disarmament had failed. Many felt that is was because Britain and France were divided on the issue, because in 1935 Britain much to the French dismay signed a treaty with Germany which allowed it to rebuild it's navy as long as it stayed below 35% of Britain's. In conclusion, I still agree with my original statement that the League of Nations was as much a success as it was a failure because although the failures of the League were more public and infamous the successes of the League were equally important if less prominent. In particular I consider that the fact that the League maintained its commitment to peaceful solutions to problems in the face of adversity was its strongest legacy, even though these solutions were not always successful. I believe that the main factor that caused the failure of the League was the Great Depression as this caused the main Powers of the League to become selfish and uncooperative. If the Great Depression had not happened I believe that the League would have been more successful. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    The figure was set at around 100,000,000,000 marks. With all the loses Germany had suffered people began to ask the question if Germany could afford. The people would be unhappy through high taxes. Germany had lost a lot of their industrial provinces and there was high unemployment.

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    Firstly, the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923 showed a weakness within the principles of the League because it appeared somewhat hypocritical. The Treaty of Versailles had outlined that Germany was to pay reparations for damages caused by the War.

  1. How successful was Bismarckas Chancellor in his foreign policies between 1871-1890?

    Germany the power to arbitrate whom she should support in the event of a war. In addition, the Reinsurance Treaty made a French attack improbably, as she was isolated and therefore had no conditions to challenge Germany. Up to now I have been explaining Bismarck's foreign policies concerning European affairs.

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    This seems ironic, as on a number of occasions Athens went against the beliefs of freedom and independence herself, such as the cases of Carystus and Naxos. The harsh treatment of her allies made Athens unpopular among the members of the league - 'For the Athenians insisted on obligations being

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    Another reason why the Abyssinian crisis was a death blow to the league and the Manchurian crisis was not is because France and Britain could have at least done something to stop the Abyssinian crisis by closing the Suez Canal, they couldn't have done much to stop the Manchurian crisis

  2. The failure of the League of Nations

    They agreed to divide up Abyssinia giving two thirds to Mussolini leaving the remaining third for Haile Selassie. Details of the plan were found out and Hoare and Laval were both sacked. By this time it was two late anyway as Mussolini had already taken over large parts of Italy.

  1. The Success Of Blitzkrieg II.

    to decide the next plan of action, Germany definitely had the upper hand. On the other side France had their commander-in-chief, general Maurice Gamelan, who was one of the reasons why the French lost the battle, because he was 68 years old and so he had lived through the last

  2. The League of Nations: Its achievements and its failures

    Plans were made for a disarmament conference were made but it only got together in 1933. But even so, in the late 1920s, the League?s failure over disarmament did not seem to serious because of the following treaties?Two important treaties in the later half of the 1920s helped preserve peace

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work