• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent was the League of Nations Weakened at Birth

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Angus Walker To What Extend was the League of Nations Weakened at Birth? The League of Nations was set up following the First World War, as part of the Treaty of Versailles. The aims of the League were to encourage the separate nations to talk instead of going to war. The notion of the League was part of Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, and so in my opinion idealistic, and several factors meant that the strength of the League was severely compromised at its birth. The first and in my opinion largest blow to the League was the absence of the USA from it. Congress had voted twice to withhold the USA from the League in 1919 and then again in 1920 49 votes to 35. The reasons that the USA did not join the League were that they were now, following the war, isolationist; they did not want to get involved with and struggles that did not involve them. ...read more.

Middle

Russia also had a huge industry, and with this extra money the League would be able to function much better. The third and I believe fatal flaw in the League of Nations was that the defeated powers were not invited to join the League. The League was set up as a place to talk about issues instead of taking action, but if the other side to these arguments were not there how could the trouble be talked about? Germany was also resentful at not being included, they felt that they had been punished enough and the countries should not sit down and talk. Due to the absence of America and Russia, Britain and France had to act as leaders. They were not up to the job both financially and militarily. Both of the countries had suffered immensely from the war; Britain was now broke and some of France was now completely destroyed, with the toll for rebuilding the shattered areas in the billions. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another flaw with the League's punishments was that if a country sitting on the permanent council liked the country in question, they could veto this move, effectively tying the League's hands behind its back. The League only met once a year, so theoretically decisions could only be made then and so it would take a long time for the League to take any action, such as the Manchurian Crisis. Angus Walker In conclusion I shall say that the League of Nations was hugely crippled at birth, lacking leadership and impetus from America, and money and influence from Russia. Without the defeated countries present the could not discuss the most important problems, and with Britain and France in charge, both severely weakened by the First World War, the League lacked the unbiased outlook that the USA would have provided. I believe that even if everything had worked out perfectly for the League it still would not operate well, but with these huge added flaws I think that the League was unable to function at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    Firstly, the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923 showed a weakness within the principles of the League because it appeared somewhat hypocritical. The Treaty of Versailles had outlined that Germany was to pay reparations for damages caused by the War.

  2. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    Failed to block off the Suez Canal. Secret dealing between Britain, France and Italy to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia if he called of the attack. [The Laval-Hoare Pact] Details leaked to press - disaster - sacked. America disgusted by league and stepped up oil exports to Italy.

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    However, in the Abyssinian crisis they didn't condemn Italy in fact they came to an agreement with them that basically gave them what they wanted. So they were seen to be giving into the demands of the aggressor. Not only did they give into Italy but the two main powers

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    Thucydides tells us that 'in the end Carystus surrended on terms [of the league]'. This case shows a much more appreciative side of Athens as she was looking out for the best interests and safety of the league by preventing a potential danger.

  1. The League of Nations

    The Senate supported much of the treaty, however, they did not support the League of Nations as it would make the US too involved in foreign affairs. Despite Wilson's efforts to sway public opinion, support of the League in America weakened and the result of his hard work was a formation of the League without the US as a member.

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    It is obvious that other European Powers - particularly Britain, France and Russia - came to see Germany's policies as "unfriendly and provocative". You should attempt to separate German motives and intentions from the impression her policies created, and assess the extent to which this impression was justified.

  1. The Congress of Vienna

    - Nationalism had developed from Liberalism. - In the 19th century, due to the development of communication, transportation and the growth of population, people demanded for: * A. Asked for national unification in order to strengthen themselves. * B. Unified themselves to compete with other countries.

  2. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    However, in the Abyssinian crisis they didn't condemn Italy in fact they came to an agreement with them that basically gave them what they wanted. So they were seen to be giving into the demands of the aggressor. Not only did they give into Italy but the two main powers

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work