• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent was the League of Nations Weakened at Birth

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Angus Walker To What Extend was the League of Nations Weakened at Birth? The League of Nations was set up following the First World War, as part of the Treaty of Versailles. The aims of the League were to encourage the separate nations to talk instead of going to war. The notion of the League was part of Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, and so in my opinion idealistic, and several factors meant that the strength of the League was severely compromised at its birth. The first and in my opinion largest blow to the League was the absence of the USA from it. Congress had voted twice to withhold the USA from the League in 1919 and then again in 1920 49 votes to 35. The reasons that the USA did not join the League were that they were now, following the war, isolationist; they did not want to get involved with and struggles that did not involve them. ...read more.

Middle

Russia also had a huge industry, and with this extra money the League would be able to function much better. The third and I believe fatal flaw in the League of Nations was that the defeated powers were not invited to join the League. The League was set up as a place to talk about issues instead of taking action, but if the other side to these arguments were not there how could the trouble be talked about? Germany was also resentful at not being included, they felt that they had been punished enough and the countries should not sit down and talk. Due to the absence of America and Russia, Britain and France had to act as leaders. They were not up to the job both financially and militarily. Both of the countries had suffered immensely from the war; Britain was now broke and some of France was now completely destroyed, with the toll for rebuilding the shattered areas in the billions. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another flaw with the League's punishments was that if a country sitting on the permanent council liked the country in question, they could veto this move, effectively tying the League's hands behind its back. The League only met once a year, so theoretically decisions could only be made then and so it would take a long time for the League to take any action, such as the Manchurian Crisis. Angus Walker In conclusion I shall say that the League of Nations was hugely crippled at birth, lacking leadership and impetus from America, and money and influence from Russia. Without the defeated countries present the could not discuss the most important problems, and with Britain and France in charge, both severely weakened by the First World War, the League lacked the unbiased outlook that the USA would have provided. I believe that even if everything had worked out perfectly for the League it still would not operate well, but with these huge added flaws I think that the League was unable to function at all. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. To what extent was the League of Nations a success?

    now agree on how to do it as no-one seemed to want to destroy the planes capable of bombing Civilians and even the proposal to ban the manufacture of chemical weapons was defeated. But the biggest problem was Germany. By now most countries felt that Germany had been unfairly treated

  2. What Were the Main Criticisms of the League of Nations and To What Extent ...

    In 1922, when Germany failed to pay an instalment of the reparations, France and Belgium decided they would take action. Germany stated that they did not have the capacity to pay the instalment, however in 1923 the French and Belgium's invaded one of Germany's most important industrial zones known as the Ruhr.

  1. Why America didn't join the league of nations.

    Failed to block off the Suez Canal. Secret dealing between Britain, France and Italy to give Italy 2/3 of Abyssinia if he called of the attack. [The Laval-Hoare Pact] Details leaked to press - disaster - sacked. America disgusted by league and stepped up oil exports to Italy.

  2. ATHENS & THE DELIAN LEAGUE

    Most were reluctant to provide military service and instead paid money to the league. According to Thucydides, 'the Athenian navy grew strong at their expense, and when they revolted, they always found themselves inadequately armed and inexperienced in war'. By this time in the progress of the Delian League, Athens'

  1. Why was the Abyssinian crisis a death blow to the league when the Manchurian ...

    as they were all the way around the other side of the world. The Chinese and Japanese were also at least in the same stage of technology where as the Italians were very much more advanced than the Abyssinians. The Abyssinians basically had spears and bows against the Italians planes and machine guns.

  2. The League of Nations

    It took a further 5 years to even agree on a draft convention for the conference and in 1933 it was rejected by a Nazi Germany who were secretly re-arming anyway. The Treaty of Versailles that the League had to uphold was seen as unfair by a lot of people; this was another of the League's failings.

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    -Just enough to prevent France making friend with Austria and Russia. Other alliances (Dual, Triple and later the Reinsurance Treaty) - too keep Russia and Austria apart from France; the terms included were mostly for mutual protection especially when one ally being attacked by a rival power.

  2. The Congress of Vienna

    * B. Unified themselves to compete with other countries. * C. Asked the government to protect their interests especially the merchants (middle class). - However, later nationalism developed to be militarism. - Usually, people needed to use force/war to succeed unification. - Therefore gradually they believed that problems should be solved by using force/war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work