• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the Nazi state a propaganda state?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the Nazi state a propaganda state? In studying Hitler's rise to power previously, we were able to establish that propaganda was one of the key factors that helped to get him into power. However, once power had been obtained, I do not think that it was possible for the Nazi state to be a total propaganda state due to the necessity to keep people happy by delivering on promises and to make progress as a unified Germany. Nevertheless, propaganda would continue to play a significant role in the state following Hitler's 'takeover,' particularly in maintaining the 'Hitler myth' itself, and would in certain areas, determine policy. On the whole, prior to Hitler's arrival, Germany was not overtly anti-Semitic, and such racial sentiment principally existed in minority groups. However, Hitler and his propaganda machine led by Goebbels, were able to stir anti-Semitic feeling to a huge extent. ...read more.


An area that was equally flooded with propaganda, but which perhaps reaped greater rewards for Hitler was economic policy. In his rise to power, Hitler had made many promises to particular social groups like farmers and the Mittelstand, particularly regarding employment. Although employment increased, promises made to farmers, who in particular had voted for Hitler in great number, were quickly forgotten, as Hitler was more concerned with larger more efficient estates which would aid Germany's fight to achieve autarky. Evidence suggests a consequential reduction in rural employment from 21% to 19%. However, despite evident economic difficulties, such action had no major repercussions on the stability of the state, due to the usage of propaganda in this area. People were made to believe that their quality of life was better. The autobahns are a striking example, which despite only creating limited employment at a time when the people didn't really have access to their so-called 'people's car,' still made the people feel more united and free. ...read more.


Also, the propagandist 'Hitler myth' that saw his personal popularity swell, was able to cover up inconsistencies and failures in the party, blaming subordinate authorities rather than the 'great leader.' Although it is apparent that the uses and effectiveness of propaganda varied greatly, Hitler was clearly unable to maintain a strong and secure regime on propaganda alone, and it only worked in certain circumstances. D. Geary in Hitler and Nazism, states that 'In general, Nazi propaganda ... was most successful where it could play upon the traditional prejudices and values of German middle-class society ... but where the regime opposed traditional loyalties, it was far less successful...,' notably in attempts to oppose the traditional church. It would appear that factors such as the creation of a totalitarian state and the associated fear played a greater part in determining the nature of the regime, making the job of propaganda easier, because even if people were unhappy at being deceived by propaganda, they were to afraid to do anything about it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. To What Extent Was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian State 1933-1939?

    The general impression of resistance towards the nazi party was little. Many Germans supported nazi regime out Hitler's personal popularity. On the other hand you could argue that the reason for the lack of opposition was through fear of consequences.

  2. To what extent was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state?

    This strategy was not successful at Nazifying the churches, and during the war more people went to the churches. This meant that there were alternative viewpoints in Germany as well as the Nazi ideals. Other Aryan opposition included the youth (the Swing pirates)

  1. Did Hitler succeed in creating a Volksgemeinschaft?

    "The churches were the only institutions which both had an alternative 'ideology' to that of the regime and were permitted to retain their own organisational autonomy. This made them a major obstacle to the Nazi attempt to establish total control over German life."

  2. The Nazi Police State

    did encourage it and had made it into a political policy, and part of his totalitarian regime. These policies were to a great extent Hitler's own; never before had any leader introduced anti-Semitic-themed laws. Hitler picked up on anti-Semitism in German society and made what he did out of it, so it was not entirely his doing, but largely.

  1. Was Nazi Germany a totalitarian state?

    Their main methods however were propaganda, fear, success and destroying all opposition to the Nazis political power. 3) What kind of resistance was there to Nazi control? Although very few people stood up to Nazi Germany and Hitler, there was a small, but very important minority who did.

  2. How successful was Nazi propaganda?

    The Nazis even got international protests to subside. They aired movies exemplifying the pleasant conditions in the concentration camps. For example, the Nazis broadcasted scenes of a masquerade presented at the Theresienstadt camp. In recognition of the significant role propaganda was playing in the Nazi's battle, the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda (Reichsministerium f�r Volksaufklrung und Propaganda)

  1. To what extent was the severity of Nazi repression an indication of the strength ...

    They then elected Nazi state as their new "Reich Bishop" and expelled all "non-Aryan" Pastors. Although some Protestants went along with this new church, some hated it, such as Reverend Martin Niemoller who established the "Confessing Church", in September 1933.

  2. Thr opposition of the Church.

    COMMUNIST AND SOCIAL DEMOCRAT OPPOSITION It is estimated that over 30,000 Communist and/or Leftist sympathizers lost their lives during the Nazi Regime's hold on power, many of these individuals suffered not just for their political association with the Nazi's political nemesis but because they actively participated in resistance to the regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work