• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the Revolution of February/march, in Russia 1917, due to the nature of Tsarism and the policies of Nicholas

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the Revolution of February/March, in Russia 1917, due to the nature of Tsarism and the policies of Nicholas II? At the turn of the 20th century Russia was a vast, however, backward empire with an undemocratic political system. The Romanov dynasty had ruled for several centuries as an absolute monarchy, with the Tsar being the supreme autocrat ruler. His power was unquestionable, as it was alleged that God had given him the divine right to rule as desired. The Tsar exercised his power through a great bureaucracy, an army sworn to loyalty to the tsar and oppressive political policies. The tsarist regime repressed freedom of speech and press, freedom to form political parties, and generally most human rights. Its policies consisted of subordination of many ethnic minority groups and persecuting or exiling political opponents to Siberia. By the time Tsar Nicholas II came to power in 1894, Russian society had never been more divided, nor had any ruler been so estranged from his people as Nicholas the II. Having never shown particular interest or ability to rule, Nicholas II was much more of a family man, however the sudden death of his father, Alexander III, resulted in the responsibility forced upon him. Nicholas II was a hesitant, reactionary and incompetent ruler, and was unable to provide the strong leadership his backward nation needed desperately. ...read more.


Stolypin did, on the other hand, manage to improve the agrarian situation somewhat, with new incentives and policies in favour of the peasants, particularly the kulaks. The Tsar lost his most able minister when Stolypin was assassinated in 1911. The Tsar's son, Alexis, was weak as he suffered from hemophilia. This had always reflected negatively on the future of Tsarism, however a monk named Rasputin, who was new at court, appeared to have the ability to stop Alexis's bleeding. Over time, Rasputin gained political influence at court as he was very popular with the Tsarina, and rumors spread about an affair between the two. Rasputin was also very notorious for his sexual escapades, which caused a scandal at court and further deteriorated the Tsar's image. "The Tsar's opponents seized on Rasputin as a sign of the Tsar's weakness and unfitness to rule Russia," states Walsh, page 83. As World War I broke out in 1914, Russia faced an invasion from Germany. This initially created a wave of popular patriotism, which swept throughout the country and united the people behind the Tsar, and anti-government protests were abandoned. However, this reprieve was short-lived. The war quickly turned out to be a disaster for both the tsar's government as well as the people. The 15 million men sent into the war were poorly equipped and armed, factories were inadequately productive and transportation and communication insufficient. ...read more.


In conclusion, it appears that by the beginning of the 20th century, Russia was a country 'ripe for revolution'. As the Tsar became progressively more estranged from his own people, he was concurrently disabling the authority of his own rule. Simultaneously, Russia was becoming increasingly exposed to other European cultures and events, and many people found the various democratic movements inspiring. As modernization began to occur, and people were becoming more educated and literate, they also became more aware of the flaws in their country's politics and began to entertain ideas of democracy and equality. The government responded to problems with violence and oppression on the rising number of opposition, as the Tsar was utterly intolerant and unwilling to compromise, which only increased resentment. A series of scandals and military defeats further deteriorated the image of Tsarism. There had never before in the history of Russia existed so many political organizations and opposition, and as they were gaining more and more support from the proletariat and peasants, which made up the bulk of the people and the army, it was simply a matter of time before an outbreak of revolution would come. It was not the First World War, which caused the revolution of 1917 - it was rather a catalyst. Thus by 1917, it appeared as though revolution was becoming inevitable, due to the nature of Tsarism and policies of Nicholas II. Written by Christina Sophonpanich IB1 16/11/05 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Although Source A is inaccurate the there are threads of truth. It tells us how the workers had gone on strike and that others had encouraged more workers to demonstrate. This information is also shown in Source C with the figures of the workers on strike dramatically increasing during the period of the revolution.

  2. What were the causes of the Russian Revolution in March 1917?

    Prices rose in the cities, as the war cause shortages of food. Lack of industrial materials cause factories to close, also causing the unemployment of workers at the same time. What was even worse for the Tsar was that the Japanese inflicted defeat after defeat on the Russians.

  1. How did living conditions change in towns as a result of the Industrial Revolution ...

    Towns Association.This was later regarded as the General Board of Health . Smith was the first to gain in in-depth insight into medical matters and to analyse infectious diseases , such as cholera and yellow fever , to begin with .

  2. How and why was Nicholas able to survive the 1905 revolution?

    Nicholas was able to survive because no group of people had the will, knowledge or courage to take on the Tsar at this time. It was not a politically based 'revolution' but a 'revolution' caused by the sheer number of economic and social problems in Russia at the time, not

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    date because he did not understand what civil liberties were expected in a modern state. The first allowance made to the nation granted people basic civil rights such as freedom of conscience, speech, assembly and association. This is a good example that Russia was beginning to modernize.

  2. Why was there a successful revolution in February 1917 in Russia?

    But when Russia had lost their first battle, the morale of the army and also the population of the country were low.

  1. Why was Nicholas II able to survive the 1905 revolution but was forced to ...

    On August 1st 1914, Russia went to war with Austria-Hungry and Germany. France and Great Britain joined in on Russia's side, being just ten years after the disaster with Japan this was a great risk to her. Russia was traditionally the defender of the Serbs and Austria-Hungry had declared war on Serbia.

  2. To what extent was the February 1917 Russian revolution inevitable after the 1905 revolution?

    This event was the trigger for the 1905 Revolution and can be interpreted as the trigger for the fall of the Tsardom. The 1905 Revolution gave birth to many of the ideas of the February 1917 revolution, for the first time the people had genuinely challenged the autocracy and had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work