• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Was The United Kingdom Successful in Negotiations at the Congress of Vienna

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Was The United Kingdom Successful in Negotiations at the Congress of Vienna Throughout the years of 1804 - 1815, Europe faced many problems; all of which were caused by an evil man, for some, but for others a legend, called Napoleon Bonaparte. When crowned emperor in 1804 he decided to make his dreams come true, make France the strongest country in Europe and in the world. For this, he created a gigantic army and began to conquer all Europe. With this happening, the other major countries of Europe saw the importance of getting together and deciding what to do with France and all the territory it had won with Napoleon campaigns. Austrian, Britain, Russian, French and Prussian ministers and representatives all decided to get together in Vienna and decide the new territorial arrangements of Europe, after napoleon had been defeated. In six months from November 1814 to May 1815, the famous treaty of Vienna was settled. ...read more.

Middle

By the British point of view, containment had to specially focus on France, so there would be no future threats by this nation. The other country to be observed was Russia. The British saw Russia as an emerging and very ambitious superpower and Tsar Alexander as a man of great ambitious plans. This issue in Vienna led to another discussion, which was about lasting peace that focused on making Europe return to how it was. People wanted Europe to be again a place of no different viewpoints and that all nations could be friendly to each other. The British thought that the balance of power in central Europe was crucial for this to happen, so Castlereagh fought thoroughly for territory to be given to Prussia and Austria. Another topic very discussed in the Vienna conference was compensation, which all nations even indirectly quested for. These were most obtained together with the territorial reshaping of Europe. ...read more.

Conclusion

This also led to what Britain imagined of how to protect lasting peace in Europe, which was what its population wanted and to improve commerce in the whole of Europe and this could very well favour the British economy. What didn't turn out well for the British was the fact that Tsar Alexander got what he wanted, he managed to increase the size of Russia with new territory he won with the treaty. This wasn't good at all for the British because they saw Alexander's Russia as a future threat and a country who had the ambition to be stronger and stronger at all time meaning this could culminate in the creation of another single power in Europe. This could create terrible effects for the continent and also for the lasting peace that the British population desired. Sources: Books: * The Great powers 1814 - 1914, Eric Wilmot. Websites: * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congress_of_Vienna ?? ?? ?? ?? Bernardo Teixeira -10 O History - Mr. Phillip Briggs ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Vienna Settlement

    Except for some overseas territories, she virtually kept all the territories she held in 1792. This was because the victorious powers did not want to weaken the new government of Louis XVIII. Nonetheless, the punitive actions taken in the Vienna Settlement on the whole should not be seen as moderate as the First treaty of Paris.

  2. "The Vienna Congress created more problems than it solved" - How far is the ...

    Metternich's comment on the alliance was "High-sounding nothing". Instead, the alliance bound Austria, Prussia and Russia together, as they were all countries that were conservative and against changes. This split the European Powers into two camps. One was the conservative Powers and the other was the liberal one, which consisted Britain and France.

  1. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    Another interesting factor which depended on the cooperation of the revolutionaries was that the movements were mainly middle-class affairs and popular interest was not encouraged by the revolutionary leaders. The division of the revolutionaries on domestic policies was also important because Liberals believed only in granting a constitution by the

  2. To what extent was the unification of Prussia due to weaknesses of Austria?

    The traditional view of Bismarck sets him to be the chief architect of the German Empire. It is thought that he had a long term strategy to make war on Austria and France in order to create a united Germany under Prussian control, as he later claimed in his memoirs.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    excuse to intervene Greece; therefore they wanted to put Greece under their guarantee. - In the Treaty of London in 1832, Greece gained independence and Prince Otto of Bavaria became the king of Greece. - Both Austria and Turkey accepted the treaty.

  2. The Congress of Vienna

    Compensation, reward and punishment It aimed at compensating those states that had lost land in the process of re-mapping Europe, at rewarding those who had helped the powers against Napoleon's supporters. * Austria was compensated with Venetia (a part of Italy)

  1. Congress of Vienna.

    During the congress he openly voiced his critical opinion of revolution and Popular sovereignty, explaining that "Union between the monarchs is the basis of the policy which must now be followed to save society from total ruin"1. His charismatic, determined and subtle nature ensured neither Russia or Prussia was bale

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    By 1910 Europe was in a perfect balance; the rival alliances produces a balance of fear which helped to defy war. How far do you think Bismarck's policies, internal and external, contributed to the debacle of 1914? After the unification of Germany in 1870, the domestic and foreign policies of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work