• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the war of 1859 the turning point to Italian unification?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the war of 1859 the turning point to Italian unification? In 1852, when Cavour became Prime Minister of Piedmont, no one expected that within ten years Italian unification would be achieved. Partly because of the failures of the 1848-49 revolutions. The peninsula was still divided into ten separate states and expelling Austria's domination over Italy was Cavour's main focus, he only ever expressed at the beginning, a vague wish that Italy achieve total unity. The war of 1859 can indeed be considered the turning point to Italian unification, the revolts that began in Sicily in 1848 instilled important lessons in Cavour. Primarily the fact that if Italy was ever going to gain independence, they needed to oust Austria. Austria held the key to any possibility of Italian unity and there was no indication that they would surrender their control. Austria were better equipped and their army were vastly superior in numbers, Piedmont did not possess the military muscle to expel Austria. ...read more.


However, it should be acknowledged that both leaders, Cavour and Napoleon had very different motives at Plombieres and there were no intentions of working towards a unified Italy. It can not be denied that Napoleon III played a indispensable role in supporting Italy. Napoleon was keen to act as the champion of liberal causes as he believed that support for Italian Independence would be popular at home. This interest coincides also with his desire to see Austria's power diminish, therefore he provided 20,00 troops to fight in the war against Austria. Also, he wished for a federated Italy with an enlarged Piedmont in the north acting as a benevolent ally: a united Italy was rejected as it could act as a threat to France. Cavour's obvious aim was to eradicate Austrian possession, in conjunction he hoped to expand his state of Piedmont into the Papal States and Lombardy. An obvious indication that unification was not considered as a possible option at Plombieres was the fact that when he signed the treaty with Napoleon, he was prepared to sacrifice Savoy and Niece to the French. ...read more.


The Italian peninsula had once been surrounded by revolutionary turmoil, where aims were divided and popular support was lacking. Secret societies such as the Carbonari possessed neither competence nor the desire to work for an Italian state, as they never took extreme action against the Austrians or embarked on outside help. So to some extent it has been proved that the war of 1859 did contribute to the path of Italian Unification as it made it a real possibility for the first time. This is what spurred Garibaldi to capture Sicily and Naples after his expedition to recover Nice from France. In which he endeavoured to blow up the ballot boxes that were to be used by those voting on whether Nice should remain Italian or again become French. If it had not been for the work of Garibaldi, Sicily and Naples would never have been annexed to Piedmont until much later. Moreover it was Cavour's political diplomacy which guided Italy to unification. The war of 1859 is evidence of Cavour's ability to understand that to have any success in ousting Austria France was essential as an ally. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. How and why did Piedmont-Sardinia play an important part in Italian Unification

    In return, Cavour asked the French for their aid concerning the Austrian problem. The Austrians had also been asked to send in troops during the war, but they had failed to enter the war. This also improved Piedmont's position with the French.

  2. To what extent was Austria the main obstacle to the unification of Italy in ...

    The lack of a universally accepted leader and hence the different political ideas between the leaders was another obstacle to a united Italian state in the period 1815-1849. This is particularly important because the natural leaders were unwilling to work together and each had a different ideology and a different way of uniting Italy.

  1. Describe the Different Stages to Italian unification between 1856 - 1871.

    France's reward was to be the seizure of Savoy and Nice. For the rest of Italy, a Kingdom of Central Italy was envisaged, which together with Rome and Naples was to make up a federation of four states. Cavour, having gained the assurance of French support, then went to Prussia

  2. To what extent was Cavour a leader of the unification of Italy?

    His sharp diplomacy used to isolate Austria and receive help from France is paramount to the beginning of Italy's unification. Even though the war of 1859 was more expensive than first anticipated, resulting in Austria being able to recoup some of its losses, in particular the wealthy province of Venetia

  1. Unification Movements - Italian unification

    * Forbade to own properties without the approval of the government * Foreign policy: * Made friends with other countries (e.g. helped Britain and France in the Crimean War) * 3. Meeting of Napoleon III and Cavour--- the Pact of Plombieres * In 1858, after the Orsini plot of assassination,

  2. Questions on World War One.

    They did not plan a war, but not afraid of fighting one - they thought that there were something to gain from it. Germany - expected war to expand her empire and break the encirclement of the Allies. France - expected war to regain Alsace-Lorraine.

  1. To what extent does Cavour deserve his reputation as the architect of Italian Unification?

    If Cavour was a committed unionist it was important that he did not let these feelings show at Plombieres or in any correspondence with Napoleon. Cavour was a shrewd enough politician to realise that he could only get France to enter a war against Austria under very exacting conditions.


    He got caught but fortunately he managed to escape before he was sentenced to death. Mazzini also went into exile to London where he spent the next few years planning many uprisings and riots. In 1848 Mazzini's dreams seemed to be realized when news of the Revolutions throughout Europe reached him.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work