• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Were Stalin's Policies Of Collectivisation And Industrialisation a success Stalin's problem was that the other advanced countries were fifty or a hundred years in front of them. He wanted to make a good distance in ten years because he believed that they would go under if they don't. To solve this problem Stalin introduced collectivization and industrialization. Collectivisation merged all the small privately owned farms under one central power that will control all production and all the finances of the farms. He also planned ambitious targets for industrial growth for every five years. On the plus side many ideological goals where fulfilled by the introduction of collectivisation, the collectivisation of agriculture is a good example of what the ideal of Communism is. In theory this should have worked brilliantly but it did not due to many different factors. ...read more.

Middle

Squads from the communist party were sent in to get more food. There was no more food in the countryside Soviet unions sold grain overseas instead of feeding those who were starving. Over seven million people died. People ate earthworms, mice ants and some even ate their own children to survive. Industrialisation targets for the first five years * Increase agriculture production by 55 per cent. * Increase industrial production by 180 per cent. * Increase investment by 228 per cent. * Increase sales of products by 70 per cent. It was an outstanding success: The results of the first five year plan Product (million tonnes) 1928 (original target) 1932 (revised target) 1932 (what was achieved) Coal 35 75 64 Oil 11.7 21.7 21.1 Iron ore 6.7 20.2 12.1 Pig iron 3.2 10 6.2 To get this achievement living conditions went down, it was impossible to build enough ...read more.

Conclusion

Prisoners in prison camps were made to do some work. Prisons then became labour camps. Were they a success? They were not an achievement; Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster. Millions of people died due to famine, which came from lack of food, which in turn came from collectivisation Industrialisation was an economic success but again was at human costs. People had to live in overcrowded rundown buildings with shared kitchens and toilets with people they did not even know. The people who worked in factories had life even worse as they had to work harder to reach industrial targets and if they were unable to complete those targets or absent for one day they would lose their jobs. Collectivisation and industrialization both were good in some ways but it lowered the standard of life completely and cost millions of people to die and suffer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The government didn't really care about the health of the people; instead, they just made them work all the time. One department where Stalin failed was customer industry. The customer industry didn't match the standards of heavy industry. Under the first Five Year Plan textile production declined, the main reason

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Both sources K and L give the same message but are presented differently. Source K is humorous whereas source L has a more serious approach. 6. "Stalin's policies and actions within the Soviet Union 1928 - 1953 were primarily designed to maintain his own power and authority."

  1. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    On the plus side many ideological goals where fulfilled by the introduction of collectivisation, the collectivisation of agriculture is a good example of what the ideal of Communism is. In theory this should have worked brilliantly but in essence it did not due to many different factors.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    A good example of this was in the Ukraine. Stalin collectivized about 75% of the Ukraine's farms by 1932 and later that year, Stalin ordered that the food being shipped out of the Ukraine, be increased substantially. Again in 1933, Stalin raised the quota for the Ukraine, and people started to starve to death.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In State Farms the land belonged to the government and the peasants would work on it for a wage paid by the government. The main problem for Stalin was what he gave the name 'kulaks'. These were the people who had prospered under the N.E.P.

  2. To What Extent was Collectivisation an Economic and Political Disaster

    This could well be seen as a political success from collectivisation. However Collectivisation was met with much opposition from the peasants and almost resulted in civil war. Stalin managed to shift the blame to corrupt officials who were "dizzy with success" and was therefore able to continue with his policy of collectivisation.

  1. In what sense did the policies of collectivization and industrialization constitute a second revolution ...

    The plan was then said to be fulfilled. , and it was. 3. The peasantry Following the NEP, agriculture in Russia was still relatively inefficient and backwards. The land was privately owned by peasants, who held small farms with little machinery.

  2. What factors made rapid industrialisation possible in England 1750-1850?

    It is the material energy of the country-the universal aid-the factor in everything we do. With coal almost any feat is possible or easy; without it we are thrown into the laborious poverty of early times'4. The use of the steam engine in manufacturing meant a higher demand for raw materials both organic and mineral.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work