• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Were Stalin's Policies Of Collectivisation And Industrialisation a success Stalin's problem was that the other advanced countries were fifty or a hundred years in front of them. He wanted to make a good distance in ten years because he believed that they would go under if they don't. To solve this problem Stalin introduced collectivization and industrialization. Collectivisation merged all the small privately owned farms under one central power that will control all production and all the finances of the farms. He also planned ambitious targets for industrial growth for every five years. On the plus side many ideological goals where fulfilled by the introduction of collectivisation, the collectivisation of agriculture is a good example of what the ideal of Communism is. In theory this should have worked brilliantly but it did not due to many different factors. ...read more.

Middle

Squads from the communist party were sent in to get more food. There was no more food in the countryside Soviet unions sold grain overseas instead of feeding those who were starving. Over seven million people died. People ate earthworms, mice ants and some even ate their own children to survive. Industrialisation targets for the first five years * Increase agriculture production by 55 per cent. * Increase industrial production by 180 per cent. * Increase investment by 228 per cent. * Increase sales of products by 70 per cent. It was an outstanding success: The results of the first five year plan Product (million tonnes) 1928 (original target) 1932 (revised target) 1932 (what was achieved) Coal 35 75 64 Oil 11.7 21.7 21.1 Iron ore 6.7 20.2 12.1 Pig iron 3.2 10 6.2 To get this achievement living conditions went down, it was impossible to build enough ...read more.

Conclusion

Prisoners in prison camps were made to do some work. Prisons then became labour camps. Were they a success? They were not an achievement; Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster. Millions of people died due to famine, which came from lack of food, which in turn came from collectivisation Industrialisation was an economic success but again was at human costs. People had to live in overcrowded rundown buildings with shared kitchens and toilets with people they did not even know. The people who worked in factories had life even worse as they had to work harder to reach industrial targets and if they were unable to complete those targets or absent for one day they would lose their jobs. Collectivisation and industrialization both were good in some ways but it lowered the standard of life completely and cost millions of people to die and suffer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. To What Extent was Collectivisation an Economic and Political Disaster

    This could well be seen as a political success from collectivisation. However Collectivisation was met with much opposition from the peasants and almost resulted in civil war. Stalin managed to shift the blame to corrupt officials who were "dizzy with success" and was therefore able to continue with his policy of collectivisation.

  2. What factors made rapid industrialisation possible in England 1750-1850?

    The problem with the use of organic raw materials (mainly wood) was the land used to grow the trees for wood, meant taking up precious land that could be used to grow food. Therefore, the uses of mineral fuels were investigated more thoroughly, although coal was being used before now, manufacturers found it difficult to use in industry.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    Collectivisation began in earnest by the forming of collectivised and state farms in 1929 and by March 1930 55% of the land had been collectivised and its resisting owners had either been shot or deported to Siberia yet still

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    to 1937 - the end of the second set of Plans when they had become 36.3 million tons and 17.7 million tons respectively. Through these series of campaigns, he was also getting workers to produce more grain to feed the growing members of industrial workers as well as selling it

  1. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    On the plus side many ideological goals where fulfilled by the introduction of collectivisation, the collectivisation of agriculture is a good example of what the ideal of Communism is. In theory this should have worked brilliantly but in essence it did not due to many different factors.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    The cartoon will show what the West thought the results of his policies were. The cartoon has a post card layout and translates to "Visit the USSR and see the pyramids!" In the cartoon Stalin is standing at the front, smiling as he is welcoming people to the pyramids in the USSR.

  1. Bay of Pigs

    At time permits] 2:30 a.m. and at 3:00 a.m. two battalions came ashore at Playa Gir�n and one battalion at Playa Larga beaches. The troops at Playa Gir�n had orders to move west, northwest, up the coast and meet with the troops at Playa Larga in the middle of the bay.

  2. Why and With What Success did Stalin Embark on an

    Collectivisation was not therefore Stalin's pre-conceived solution. Collectivisation emerged as the solution to the grain procurement, because certain commonly-held assumptions in the party pushed in that direction. Firstly, as a largely urban movement (in 1917 only 7.6% of party members had been peasants), the Communists believed in modernisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work