Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalin's policies of collectivisation and industrialisation a success.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To What Extent Were Stalin's Policies Of Collectivisation And Industrialisation a success Stalin's problem was that the other advanced countries were fifty or a hundred years in front of them. He wanted to make a good distance in ten years because he believed that they would go under if they don't. To solve this problem Stalin introduced collectivization and industrialization. Collectivisation merged all the small privately owned farms under one central power that will control all production and all the finances of the farms. He also planned ambitious targets for industrial growth for every five years. On the plus side many ideological goals where fulfilled by the introduction of collectivisation, the collectivisation of agriculture is a good example of what the ideal of Communism is. In theory this should have worked brilliantly but it did not due to many different factors. ...read more.

Middle

Squads from the communist party were sent in to get more food. There was no more food in the countryside Soviet unions sold grain overseas instead of feeding those who were starving. Over seven million people died. People ate earthworms, mice ants and some even ate their own children to survive. Industrialisation targets for the first five years * Increase agriculture production by 55 per cent. * Increase industrial production by 180 per cent. * Increase investment by 228 per cent. * Increase sales of products by 70 per cent. It was an outstanding success: The results of the first five year plan Product (million tonnes) 1928 (original target) 1932 (revised target) 1932 (what was achieved) Coal 35 75 64 Oil 11.7 21.7 21.1 Iron ore 6.7 20.2 12.1 Pig iron 3.2 10 6.2 To get this achievement living conditions went down, it was impossible to build enough ...read more.

Conclusion

Prisoners in prison camps were made to do some work. Prisons then became labour camps. Were they a success? They were not an achievement; Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster. Millions of people died due to famine, which came from lack of food, which in turn came from collectivisation Industrialisation was an economic success but again was at human costs. People had to live in overcrowded rundown buildings with shared kitchens and toilets with people they did not even know. The people who worked in factories had life even worse as they had to work harder to reach industrial targets and if they were unable to complete those targets or absent for one day they would lose their jobs. Collectivisation and industrialization both were good in some ways but it lowered the standard of life completely and cost millions of people to die and suffer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    the USSR an encouragement of socialism and industrialisation to other countries like Cuba and China who saw the USSR transform dramatically. However, if you compare Russia after the five-year plans to the rest of the world, they were still quite far behind.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    and it was fueled by fear, not the desire for the well-being of Russia. The way that Stalin went about enforcing his new policies also did not go over well. Unlike Lenin, he did not think about the wishes of the people, and this was one of his biggest flaws.

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    How far do these sources show this to be true? In the Soviet Union, during 1928 - 1953, Stalin had absolute control over everything. He was a talented politician who eventually reached and maintained his position of "Supreme Ruler". He was the most powerful dictators in the 20th Century.

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    The idea of introducing mandatory Kolkhoz's, or collective farms, was very communist because it meant peasants all worked together for the good of the country, without making a profit for themselves. An important part of collectivisation was dekulakisation, which aimed to 'equalise' Russian peasants by eliminating the Kulaks, or rich peasants, usually ones who owned animals or farm machinery.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    They could little point in sharing their resources with others to increase production for feeding the hungry town workers when they had enough to eat. Even though Stalin tried to entice them into accepting collectivisation by offering free seed and perks to sow, the farmers were still concerned over the

  2. Bay of Pigs

    Off the coast was the command and control ship and another vessel carrying supplies for the invading forces. The Cuban air force made quick work of the supply ships, sinking the command vessel the Marsopa and the supply ship the Houston, blasting them to pieces with five- inch rockets.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    In State Farms the land belonged to the government and the peasants would work on it for a wage paid by the government. The main problem for Stalin was what he gave the name 'kulaks'. These were the people who had prospered under the N.E.P.

  2. To What Extent was Collectivisation an Economic and Political Disaster

    This could well be seen as a political success from collectivisation. However Collectivisation was met with much opposition from the peasants and almost resulted in civil war. Stalin managed to shift the blame to corrupt officials who were "dizzy with success" and was therefore able to continue with his policy of collectivisation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work